It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Redback
originally posted by: bigtrousers
originally posted by: bigyin
a reply to: Redback
The law is changing so if you use iPlayer you need a license.
The point is though just having a tv in your house will likely make you need a license whether you switch it on or not.
So does that mean having iplayer app installed, which sometimes comes as standard on some devices means you will need a license. I don't know. Just asking.
if we re a country run by the people then this extortion racket shouldnt even exist, bbc is pish compared to pretty much every other channel.
even ch5 has better stuff on it and thats always been free.
Fully agree BT apart from the ch5 bit, i know nothing about ch5.lol The BBC should be in a court of law explaining what goes on there and then should be closed forever.
originally posted by: bigyin
iPlayer 'loophole' to close on 1 September
Reading this I wonder how it applies to smart phones. Does this mean having a smart phone you will have to have a tv license ?
TV license only covers 3 devices, so in a typical house you might have 2 or 3 tv's and maybe another 4 smart phones plus other devices capable of watching catch up tv on iplayer. So 1 license won't cover that lot, who in the house will be responsible for buying multiple licenses.
It's just a crazy idea. High time tv license was done away with imo
originally posted by: SaturnFX
If you watch anything streaming on your computer, console, tablet, or phone, you need a seperate license for each device also...this includes youtube streaming, or any other streaming live service (twitch for example, periscope).
So, if you have in home, 2 televisions, a computer, a laptop, a tablet, and a xbox..that could be costing you £900 a year extra..because they said so.
originally posted by: Sparky63
Wow...State sponsored mind manipulation and they make you pay for it whether you like it or not....
...
I cancelled my cable subscription 8 years ago and only use my TV to watch dvd's.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: bigtrousers
its not a legal requirement to have a t.v licence, perhaps it is you that should be looking into the law.
It is a legal requirement
...
you are breaking the law if you watch streaming television in the uk without paying for it. clearcut and simple.
originally posted by: bigtrousers
its not criminal, its civil.
363 Licence required for use of TV receiver
...
(3) A person with a television receiver in his possession or under his control who—
(a) intends to install or use it in contravention of subsection (1), or
(b) knows, or has reasonable grounds for believing, that another person intends to install or use it in contravention of that subsection,
is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.
originally posted by: EvillerBob
originally posted by: bigtrousers
its not criminal, its civil.
It's a summary criminal offence for which you can be convicted and fined, though not imprisoned.
It might be enforced by a civil agency, but it is a criminal offence.
Part 4: Communications Act 2003
363 Licence required for use of TV receiver
...
(3) A person with a television receiver in his possession or under his control who—
(a) intends to install or use it in contravention of subsection (1), or
(b) knows, or has reasonable grounds for believing, that another person intends to install or use it in contravention of that subsection,
is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.
originally posted by: Redback
originally posted by: bigyin
Do you have a smart phone ?
If so then you should have a tv license
I think i am missing something here...!!!!
Yes i have a smartphone, an ipad, a tablet and a laptop but i dont watch live tv which is what the license is for is it not?
originally posted by: bigtrousers
a " tv receiver" could literally be a piece of metal.
Meaning of “television receiver”
9.—(1) In Part 4 of the Act (licensing of TV reception), “television receiver” means any apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose.
(2) In this regulation, any reference to receiving a television programme service includes a reference to receiving by any means any programme included in that service, where that programme is received at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public by virtue of its being broadcast or distributed as part of that service.
originally posted by: EvillerBob
originally posted by: bigtrousers
a " tv receiver" could literally be a piece of metal.
Saying random things doesn't make them true. The legal meaning of "TV receiver" took less time to find than it took to read your post.
The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004
Meaning of “television receiver”
9.—(1) In Part 4 of the Act (licensing of TV reception), “television receiver” means any apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose.
(2) In this regulation, any reference to receiving a television programme service includes a reference to receiving by any means any programme included in that service, where that programme is received at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is received by members of the public by virtue of its being broadcast or distributed as part of that service.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
YOU just scared the CRAP out of me.
NOBODY 'S GETTING IN THE DAMN HOUSE!
originally posted by: Gin
a reply to: reldra
Those guys were as annoying as Jehovah's witnesses. Brother of mine often threatened to offer them a cup of coffee steeled with laxative so they would stop bothering his family and their next victims.
originally posted by: TDawg61
originally posted by: Gin
a reply to: reldra
Those guys were as annoying as Jehovah's witnesses. Brother of mine often threatened to offer them a cup of coffee steeled with laxative so they would stop bothering his family and their next victims.
Would have been hilarious and deserved but I fear may open your brother up to arrest.