It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: blupblup
Cool beans - will give me something to read as I struggle with my 4th night shift on the bounce
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: crazyewok
Is the British equivalent run by the private sector like the NSA? are they also into data mining for profits?
The NSA is mostly run by private interest, they also are for profits and as corrupted as it can be.
originally posted by: crazyewok
If I remember rightly blair tried his own patriot act and failed too.
originally posted by: bastion
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
What is dave playing at??
Keeping the manifesto pledges to scrap human rights, introducing the snooping charter and banning protests against the savage upcoming cuts. Same stuff they tried to pass through Parliament last time but couldn't secure a majority vote, now it's a dead cert.
The package of powers, first proposed in March, would allow courts to force a person to send their tweets and Facebook posts to the police for approval.
Ofcom will have new powers to pressurise broadcasters which show content deemed “extreme” while the Charity Commission would be mandated to scrutinise charities who “misappropriate funds”.
Mr. Cameron’s office said the proposals included a new system under which the police would be able to apply for “disruption orders” allowing them to restrict the activities of those thought to be radicalizing people. The orders would be overseen by the courts.
Details have yet to be made public, but according to British news reports, the orders could include a requirement that anyone subject to the restrictions submit in advance any material to be published in print, digitally, or on social media.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: blupblup
I never said they caused this one, but they didn't exactly do much to stave it off or mitigate it either. I was telling my parents in 2002 (when I was just 20) that the house price bubble would be trouble, but no one wanted to know and that was the attitude at the top.
As for the 3 out of the last 4 comment - slight misrepresentation... There was a surplus every year between 1947 and 1974, when there were alternating Tory and Labour Governments and it was a Labour Government that tanked the economy and killed the surplus beforew Maggie swept in. Labour also inherited a surplus in 1997 from the Tories too.
And I didn't vote Tory either...