It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: interupt42
Wow, By the cops demeanour it doesn't look like it was his first time doing something like this. I hope they go back an re investigate other cases that he was involved with.
Now hopefully the race baiter’s, MSM,Jesse Jack$on, Al $harpton and simple minded folks don't make this into another case of racism of the bat, as that would take attention away from the real issue: police training , qualifications, control issues, and compensation.
If there is evidence in the shooter's past of racism, then let them have at him. But as it is, there are at least two bad cops involved, the shooter and the guy on scene that watched him plant the taser next to the body and did nothing about it. They need to make the original police reports public to see how many bad cops are involved in the case.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: alienjuggalo
Thankfully there was a concerned citizen who was able to film this.
That greaseball thought he'd get away with it too. Too bad for him, hope the scumbag gets life
Police will likley harras the guy now for exposing them.
originally posted by: Badgered1
Eight shots (and he was still running until that last one) at close-ish range, and he still has to cuff him? What on earth was he shooting at? Was he trying for a wound, or to kill?
Victim didn't appear to be armed, so the officer obviously was afraid of....possibly the way he ran away from him?
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: alienjuggalo
Thankfully there was a concerned citizen who was able to film this.
That greaseball thought he'd get away with it too. Too bad for him, hope the scumbag gets life
Police will likley harras the guy now for exposing them.
I think this is likely. I also think it is likely that in the end, this cop won't see the death penalty and, quite possibly, only a little of the inside of a prison cell. The police (and those higher up the food chain) won't stand for that precedent being set. The boys in blue appear to be throwing him under the bus now but that may be to placate the public because there is such graphic and clear evidence showing this officers actions. I think they'll spin it in the end and the guy who shot the video better watch his rear. They'll come for him.
Another poster said it (and I think he is something of an apologist for the police), that if the officer thought the man was a threat to the public he is still within the law to shoot him. This guy tried to run twice (what is he guilty of?). Who tazed who is not that clear in the beginning so they'll just bank on that fuzziness and say the suspect tazed him, or they may go the other way and say the cop tazed him and it didn't take him down so he was obviously affected by some narcotic. The officer put 7 shots in him before he went down. The cop says he thought the guy was "on something" and "behaving erratically" and that it took that much to take him down is additional circumstantial evidence and there ya go, the officer behaved in accordance with the law. He thought the man was a threat to the public. Done. All of this is revealed after they release whatever they can dig up on this guy to and release it to the media to facilitate a character assassination of the victim.
I hope I'm wrong. I really, really do. I would like to see some sort of check on the power of the police over the citizenry because this kind of cold-blooded murder goes down all the time.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: alienjuggalo
Thankfully there was a concerned citizen who was able to film this.
That greaseball thought he'd get away with it too. Too bad for him, hope the scumbag gets life
Police will likley harras the guy now for exposing them.
I think this is likely. I also think it is likely that in the end, this cop won't see the death penalty and, quite possibly, only a little of the inside of a prison cell. The police (and those higher up the food chain) won't stand for that precedent being set. The boys in blue appear to be throwing him under the bus now but that may be to placate the public because there is such graphic and clear evidence showing this officers actions. I think they'll spin it in the end and the guy who shot the video better watch his rear. They'll come for him.
Another poster said it (and I think he is something of an apologist for the police), that if the officer thought the man was a threat to the public he is still within the law to shoot him. This guy tried to run twice (what is he guilty of?). Who tazed who is not that clear in the beginning so they'll just bank on that fuzziness and say the suspect tazed him, or they may go the other way and say the cop tazed him and it didn't take him down so he was obviously affected by some narcotic. The officer put 7 shots in him before he went down. The cop says he thought the guy was "on something" and "behaving erratically" and that it took that much to take him down is additional circumstantial evidence and there ya go, the officer behaved in accordance with the law. He thought the man was a threat to the public. Done. All of this is revealed after they release whatever they can dig up on this guy to and release it to the media to facilitate a character assassination of the victim.
I hope I'm wrong. I really, really do. I would like to see some sort of check on the power of the police over the citizenry because this kind of cold-blooded murder goes down all the time.
The law does state that if the suspect is a threat to the public (say fleeing with a gun in his hand) then deadly force is authorized, so the poster in question has a point. From the video, however, I don't see how one could say that this is the case here.
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: alienjuggalo
Thankfully there was a concerned citizen who was able to film this.
That greaseball thought he'd get away with it too. Too bad for him, hope the scumbag gets life
Police will likley harras the guy now for exposing them.
I think this is likely. I also think it is likely that in the end, this cop won't see the death penalty and, quite possibly, only a little of the inside of a prison cell. The police (and those higher up the food chain) won't stand for that precedent being set. The boys in blue appear to be throwing him under the bus now but that may be to placate the public because there is such graphic and clear evidence showing this officers actions. I think they'll spin it in the end and the guy who shot the video better watch his rear. They'll come for him.
Another poster said it (and I think he is something of an apologist for the police), that if the officer thought the man was a threat to the public he is still within the law to shoot him. This guy tried to run twice (what is he guilty of?). Who tazed who is not that clear in the beginning so they'll just bank on that fuzziness and say the suspect tazed him, or they may go the other way and say the cop tazed him and it didn't take him down so he was obviously affected by some narcotic. The officer put 7 shots in him before he went down. The cop says he thought the guy was "on something" and "behaving erratically" and that it took that much to take him down is additional circumstantial evidence and there ya go, the officer behaved in accordance with the law. He thought the man was a threat to the public. Done. All of this is revealed after they release whatever they can dig up on this guy to and release it to the media to facilitate a character assassination of the victim.
I hope I'm wrong. I really, really do. I would like to see some sort of check on the power of the police over the citizenry because this kind of cold-blooded murder goes down all the time.
The law does state that if the suspect is a threat to the public (say fleeing with a gun in his hand) then deadly force is authorized, so the poster in question has a point. From the video, however, I don't see how one could say that this is the case here.
If they say the cop thought the victim was on some sort of narcotic that made him erratic and violent they might be able to pull it off. It's a stretch, but they have stretched pretty far to maintain this status quo where the police can use deadly force with ever growing impunity.
For the record, I hope that you are right and I am wrong.
originally posted by: jefwane
Just did my morning round of news sites. Huffpost, WND, TheBlaze, CNN, Fox, pretty much every new site is reporting the same. What is unique is the unanimity of comments on both left and right wing sites. Pretty much everyone, regardless of their feelings about police, or political persuasion is saying it looks like murder. Even the cop apologists they had on CNN last night was unable to mount any defense of the officer.
Another poster said it (and I think he is something of an apologist for the police), that if the officer thought the man was a threat to the public he is still within the law to shoot him.
originally posted by: jefwane
a reply to: Entreri06
Top story on Foxnews.com when I go there. Has the video as well, sure you just don't hate Fox? That's alright, but they don't seem to be trying to ignore this to me. I can barely stomach fox on TV most of the time myself, but I don't see them ignoring it.