It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: smurfy
Poor ol' Op is getting a bad time, perhaps Scot Waring's treatment of the picture is mostly the blame.
He decribes the image as if it is done and dusted that it is some kind of building, and goes on to say how it's been eroded over millions of years as if.
originally posted by: Thisbseth
a reply to: skyblueworld
Astronaut Gene Cernan already said he went to the mars though. So its not tat baffling anymore. And it was no mistake
Starts at 2:59
originally posted by: JustMike
a reply to: skyblueworld
(...)
Re the image: as we now know that the resolution is 6.08 metres/pixel and we know the image size is 537px × 2,017px, someone with the time and patience to do the measuring can tell us the rough size of that (apparent) rectangular shape. At a very rough guess I'd put it at around 1 km on its long axis but that's just by eye, without accurate measuring.
originally posted by: JustMike
a reply to: skyblueworld
It's well worth reviving the discussion.
It's a fascinating subject and this image is certainly one of the more interesting ones I've seen.
originally posted by: skyblueworld
originally posted by: Thisbseth
a reply to: skyblueworld
Astronaut Gene Cernan already said he went to the mars though. So its not tat baffling anymore. And it was no mistake
Starts at 2:59
That deserves a thread of it's own!
Has NASA retracted his allegations?
Mind boggling!
originally posted by: alphabot
There's no structures of any size. Even the pyramids are small. There was water everywhere before Mars was burnt up.
originally posted by: LeFaiseur
originally posted by: JustMike
a reply to: skyblueworld
(...)
Re the image: as we now know that the resolution is 6.08 metres/pixel and we know the image size is 537px × 2,017px, someone with the time and patience to do the measuring can tell us the rough size of that (apparent) rectangular shape. At a very rough guess I'd put it at around 1 km on its long axis but that's just by eye, without accurate measuring.
Counting the pixels in photoshop (through cropping and rotating), I got roughly 306*366, which gives 1860.48 x 2225.28 metres (with 1 pixel = 6,08 metres).
so, again roughly :
1.27 x 1.67 mi / 1.86 x 2.22 km