It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The US Supreme Court Appears to Side With the January 6th 2021 Capitol Protestors.

page: 2
27
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 01:11 AM
link   
a reply to: ElitePlebeian2

You're right. My apologies, I guess I haven't had the warmest of welcomes. I'll do better.



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 01:21 AM
link   
Hmm I wonder why the SCOTUS might start to hit the doj? It's not like the DOJ ignored threats to some of them or anything. SCOTUS knows full well how partisan the doj has become! This is a self-inflicted wound, if the doj was not being partisan they would of had nothing to worry about! Wouldn't it be juicier if some of the left leaning judges agreed and sided with the conservatives on this? It's happened more than once in recent memory.
edit on 17-4-2024 by hangedman13 because: Additional thought added



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 02:32 AM
link   
a reply to: WeMustCare

And here i was thinking we're all cool with runing over and killing protestors...

Good thing some have some common sense left...



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 07:50 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 


(post by ImagoDei removed for a manners violation)

posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 08:44 AM
link   
While the more Conservative justices indicated they may want to narrow the law, they also seemed hesitant in narrowing it so much as to affect the J6 cases.



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 08:59 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 


(post by SomeStupidName removed for a manners violation)

posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 09:56 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 


(post by ImagoDei removed for a manners violation)
(post by YourFaceAgain removed for a manners violation)

posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 10:38 AM
link   

edit on 4/17/2024 by yeahright because: Mod edit for Spam



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 10:54 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 11:11 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 11:40 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 11:44 AM
link   
a reply to: WeMustCare

I wouldn't say SCOTUS is endorsing or condoning the protestors so much as disagreeing with how severely they should be punished and the ethical ramifications of future prosecutions that center on obstruction. They want to nail down a more precise and intellectual summary of the offense to accurately punish the accused, and by they I mean the lawyer, to which the court is stymied how to catalogue the matter. But of course oversimplification is a key ingredient in rage bait.


(post by YourFaceAgain removed for a manners violation)

posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 12:43 PM
link   
a reply to: WeMustCare

The biggest question is what will happen to all who were involved in keeping these people locked away for so long? When inmates are locked away wrongly like this, they get compensated. I think all those locked up right now for January 6th peaceful protest should be compensated directly from the pockets of those politicians and judges involved in locking them up.



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 01:18 PM
link   
Yes. Somewhere between half and two thirds of everything they have.

a reply to: LSU2018



posted on Apr, 17 2024 @ 01:30 PM
link   



You Will Be Post Banned !!!!



new topics

top topics



 
27
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join