It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
....it is now being speculated that after Hamas broke through the gates that Jihad came afterwards and it was Jihad that may have committed those atrocities.
The two released woman hostages spoke well of the treatment by Hamas, so are they not to be believed after their release?
Hamas is not Jihad.....
.... they practice Sunni Islam religion.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: quintessentone
....it is now being speculated that after Hamas broke through the gates that Jihad came afterwards and it was Jihad that may have committed those atrocities.
Clutch at any straw in a desperate attempt to blame anyone or anything other than Hamas.
Shameful.
The two released woman hostages spoke well of the treatment by Hamas, so are they not to be believed after their release?
I'm sure the hostages that were found dead would speak equally as well of the treatment they received from Hamas.
As will those that were raped and beaten.
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
This is not an argument about annexation, this is about whos land it is.
Historically, Israel owned the land. Not hard to figure that one out.
If the UN came in and said "we are annexing away 90% of your countries land to give to "X"", how would that go over with the people where you live? Not very good I bet.
Surprised you had enough time to even figure that one out bud, good for you. I feel just fine about myself all day every day, not ignorant like some in this thread that claim Palestine "owns/owned" land.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: quintessentone
....it is now being speculated that after Hamas broke through the gates that Jihad came afterwards and it was Jihad that may have committed those atrocities.
Clutch at any straw in a desperate attempt to blame anyone or anything other than Hamas.
Shameful.
The two released woman hostages spoke well of the treatment by Hamas, so are they not to be believed after their release?
I'm sure the hostages that were found dead would speak equally as well of the treatment they received from Hamas.
As will those that were raped and beaten.
Palestinian children in Israeli prisons were also beaten and some sexually abused. Any comment on that?
If you see older maps of the region you will see that Palestinian land went from the river to the sea.
They just want their land back that was taken or annexed by Isreal.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone
"From the river to the sea or from the land to the sea was researched as originating from an Israeli chant, so get your facts straight first of all."
Are you seriously suggesting that when Hamas and their supporters chant that, they are being pro Israeli?!!!!
If you see older maps of the region you will see that Palestinian land went from the river to the sea. They just want their land back that was taken or annexed by Isreal.
originally posted by: quintessentone
I'm sure the Palestinian dead, mostly children, would not speak well of Israel either. See how that works?
Palestinian children in Israeli prisons were also beaten and some sexually abused. Any comment on that?
Arrested for such offences as attempted stabbings, stone throwings at Israeli soldiers or having contacts with hostile organisations, many were held under administrative detention, meaning Israel held them without trial.
In contrast to previous prisoner swaps, notably the deal under which Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit was released by Hamas in 2011, none has been convicted of murdering Israelis.
In that deal, Israel released more than 1,000 prisoners, some convicted of murder, including Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader in the Gaza Strip and one of those held responsible by Israel for a deadly Oct. 7 Hamas assault on Israel.
Article Eleven:
The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up. Neither a single Arab country nor all Arab countries, neither any king or president, nor all the kings and presidents, neither any organization nor all of them, be they Palestinian or Arab, possess the right to do that. Palestine is an Islamic Waqf land consecrated for Moslem generations until Judgement Day. This being so, who could claim to have the right to represent Moslem generations till Judgement Day?
This is the law governing the land of Palestine in the Islamic Sharia (law) and the same goes for any land the Moslems have conquered by force, because during the times of (Islamic) conquests, the Moslems consecrated these lands to Moslem generations till the Day of Judgement.
It happened like this: When the leaders of the Islamic armies conquered Syria and Iraq, they sent to the Caliph of the Moslems, Umar bin-el-Khatab, asking for his advice concerning the conquered land - whether they should divide it among the soldiers, or leave it for its owners, or what? After consultations and discussions between the Caliph of the Moslems, Omar bin-el-Khatab and companions of the Prophet, Allah bless him and grant him salvation, it was decided that the land should be left with its owners who could benefit by its fruit. As for the real ownership of the land and the land itself, it should be consecrated for Moslem generations till Judgement Day. Those who are on the land, are there only to benefit from its fruit. This Waqf remains as long as earth and heaven remain. Any procedure in contradiction to Islamic Sharia, where Palestine is concerned, is null and void.
"Verily, this is a certain truth. Wherefore praise the name of thy Lord, the great Allah." (The Inevitable - verse 95).
originally posted by: PorkChop96
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: quintessentone
....it is now being speculated that after Hamas broke through the gates that Jihad came afterwards and it was Jihad that may have committed those atrocities.
Clutch at any straw in a desperate attempt to blame anyone or anything other than Hamas.
Shameful.
The two released woman hostages spoke well of the treatment by Hamas, so are they not to be believed after their release?
I'm sure the hostages that were found dead would speak equally as well of the treatment they received from Hamas.
As will those that were raped and beaten.
Palestinian children in Israeli prisons were also beaten and some sexually abused. Any comment on that?
Proof?
Pretty sure there have been others to ask for sources/proof of this. Yet here you are still making the claim with no proof to back up your outlandish claims.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Degradation33
I will say, I have seen some videos of people claiming to be of Islamic faith explaining the historical facts that israel has the oldest claim to the area by ALOT.
thats all I have to say.