It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nygdan
You have a conservative think tank and an industry lobbyiest.
But these guys are not doing the actual climate research. Some researchers find evidence for, others find evidence against, global warming. They don't need to be shills for 'bad industry types' anymore than others need to be 'useful idiots for obessive environmentalists'.
Yeah... from those ones with big money/oil industry financing studies.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
About The Kyoto Protocol I have yet to a single scientist claim it will have more then a 10th of a degree change off projected temps in 2050. I have seen projections much lower though.
Originally posted by E_T
Yeah... from those ones with big money/oil industry financing studies.
Human memory is extremely short, isn't it?
Arctic Climate Impact Assessment
Originally posted by Majic
But as you follow the money, pro or con, involved in Global Warming, you will find that, like everything else, it's all about money and power.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
Looking up the names signed on the petition shows that many of the scientists are not even close to being in the field of atmospheric chemistry. Not only that but you can find some funny names like Perry Mason, Michael J. Fox, John C. Grisham, Geri Halliwel (ginger spice),Drs. Frank Burns, Honeycutt, and Pierce from M*A*S*H*.
"The mailing is clearly designed to be deceptive by giving people the impression that the article, which is full of half-truths, is a reprint and has passed peer review," complained Raymond Pierrehumbert, an atmospheric chemist at the University of Chicago. NAS foreign secretary F. Sherwood Rowland, an atmospheric chemist,