It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Umbrax
Lately I have noticed a lot of members here that are skeptic of the Global warming scare. Skepticism is a very good thing, but what is it that sets off our alarm? Is it conflicting points of view? Contradictions with what we have already learned? My skeptic alarm goes off when I think "who benefits".
When it comes to reading reports on global warming you have to think, who benefits from this report? Do I benefit? Does the author benefit? Does the person or organization funding the author benefit.
Who benefits and what is the benefit we should be all asking.
When it comes to reading reports on global warming you have to think, who benefits from this report
Originally posted by enaught
you immediately start talking about your conceited self and you tell us how we have to think when we read reports on global warming:
I was not born yesterday, I know what you are doing and why.
you immediately start talking about your conceited self and you tell us how we have to think when we read reports on global warming:
I was not born yesterday, I know what you are doing and why.
Originally posted by WheelsRCool
The science against global warming is often funded by industry and oil corporations....
The fact is, no one knows if global warming is happening or not.
FACT: CO2 levels in the atmosphere are increasing.
GUESS: Rising CO2 levels are creating a "global" warming affect.
You have so many variables to consider. Look at the sciene to ocean levels. You might think measuring ocean levels is fairly easy. It isn't. That act in itself is so complex....
If climate change is measured in a city, a city is hotter than the surrounding countryside....
Furthermore, why is it that certain cities will measure as having lost heat while others claim an increase in temperature, when both cities are in the same state oftentimes.
Since there are lots of cities and these cities give off heat, could they be heating the atmosphere somewhat?
Where is the evidence that global warming causes flooding and increased rain, when the amount of storms on this Earth has not increased any?
Is "global warming" is happening, then why is the Antarctic continent growing colder?
Furthermore, why is everyone afraid of the polar ice caps melting when Antarctica contains 90% of the world's ice, and is growing colder?
HOW are many of these "predictions" made by scientists? Many of them through computer models, which are highly-inaccurate.
How can we claim that we're "messing up the enviroment," when the environment has no set state in the first place?
Originally posted by etothex
Dismissing someone's work based on who they recieve funds from is a decision made out of poor character.
THE DENIAL MACHINE
In the past few years, a hurricane has engulfed the debate about global warming. This scientific issue has become a rhetorical firestorm with science pitted against spin and inflammatory words on both sides.
How could scientific fact, which many believe could determine the very future of the planet, become a political battleground, pitting left versus right, environmentalist versus climate change sceptic?
Originally posted by Nygdan
You have a conservative think tank and an industry lobbyiest.
But these guys are not doing the actual climate research. Some researchers find evidence for, others find evidence against, global warming. They don't need to be shills for 'bad industry types' anymore than others need to be 'useful idiots for obessive environmentalists'.
Originally posted by StellarX
So any comments on the 'global warming' we see happening on all the planets excluding ,apparently, this one?