It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Zaphod58
reply to post by freakjive
Go look at the pictures again. You have a person close enough to reach out and touch the "diver", facing a direction he would be hard pressed to miss seeing anything, with his entire face visible. That means the life jacket wasn't obscuring his vision. Then there was the person with the camera...
hounddoghowlie
reply to post by conspiracy nut
why is that, barracks reported father is black. is there some kind of rule or something that says a black muslim man has to marry a black muslim woman.
and here i found this picture. seems others think the same and there is a facial match.
ETA: forgot to post the link, don't care much for but that is where the pic comes from.
universalfreepress.com... as-real-father-loretta-fuddy-and-the-secret-religion-he-founded/
edit on 26-2-2014 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)
Stormdancer777
Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo
founder of the cult
en.wikipedia.org...
Bilk22
I think the whole birth certificate thing points to it along with his use of more than a dozen social security numbers.
What would you expect? He's the POTUS now and he controls the justice system. This stuff wasn't out before he was elected. I think the sources for the SS numbers are verifiable.
hellobruce
Bilk22
I think the whole birth certificate thing points to it along with his use of more than a dozen social security numbers.
His birth certificates show he was born in Hawaii, and there is no record of him having more than a dozen SSN's, that claim is just a stupid birther made up story....
Remember, every single birther court case has failed (over 200 of them so far) as birthers have no evidence for any of their claims, including the SSN's....edit on 26-2-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)
Bilk22
I think the sources for the SS numbers are verifiable.
hellobruce
Bilk22
I think the sources for the SS numbers are verifiable.
No, it is just another birther silly claim, not based on any real evidence. Which is why every single birther court case has failed!
Oh I agree with that. If he were brought here illegally then they used that statute to get a birth certificate in Hawaii.
xuenchen
reply to post by Bilk22
Another possibility;
Obama could easily be an adopted orphan.
The records are sealed and a "Legal" birth certificate is issued when a legal adoption is certified in court.
Fuddy would have known.
That is the big secret.
Obama may not have been born on U.S. soil.
The laws in Hawaii allowed this until the late 60's I think.
This was applicable in 1961
Take notice of the "Repealed" statutes;
AdmRules1/8 8A B VR Admin Rules.pdf
Mikeultra
The scuba diver was just fitting her with cement shoes.
Bilk22
Here's the link to the SS numbers. Go ahead and prove them wrong.
Finally, what does Neil Sankey think of his own list? The Guardian asked him: Most recently, he carried out an exhaustive search of databases that he claims threw up 140 different identification numbers and addresses for “Barack Obama”. He admits the findings prove nothing — there is nothing to link the entries to the president… Let’s sum up: an error-riddled search with repeated false genders, multiple false names, dozens of false street addresses, and a few false states for something as easily located as the White House, generated from databases that at times contain more inaccurate information than accurate information, somehow generates multiple social security numbers for Barack Obama. Meanwhile, the search is rejected as proving nothing by the very person who carried it out. There are two conclusions you can draw from this: 1. This sure is one screwed up list. 2. Clearly, Stanley Ann Dunham was a man and Barack Obama does not actually exist. I go with Option 1.
hellobruce
Bilk22
Here's the link to the SS numbers. Go ahead and prove them wrong.
You are the one making the claim, it is up to YOU to prove Obama used them, not for others to disprove it.... that is the way it works in the real world, I do not know how it works in birther bizarro world!
However, what does the person who made that list think of it?
Finally, what does Neil Sankey think of his own list? The Guardian asked him: Most recently, he carried out an exhaustive search of databases that he claims threw up 140 different identification numbers and addresses for “Barack Obama”. He admits the findings prove nothing — there is nothing to link the entries to the president… Let’s sum up: an error-riddled search with repeated false genders, multiple false names, dozens of false street addresses, and a few false states for something as easily located as the White House, generated from databases that at times contain more inaccurate information than accurate information, somehow generates multiple social security numbers for Barack Obama. Meanwhile, the search is rejected as proving nothing by the very person who carried it out. There are two conclusions you can draw from this: 1. This sure is one screwed up list. 2. Clearly, Stanley Ann Dunham was a man and Barack Obama does not actually exist. I go with Option 1.
irregulartimes.com...
He also believes his training in Scotland Yard is now reaping benefits for the Birthers. The same techniques he used to analyse the IRA's associations he is now applying to Obama. Most recently, he carried out an exhaustive search of databases that he claims threw up 140 different identification numbers and addresses for "Barack Obama". He admits the findings prove nothing — there is nothing to link the entries to the president — but he believes it raises further doubts that need investigating.
You can look at "Barack Hussein Obama, II" and see the forgery. Look at the "I" in Hussein then look at the "II". They're clearly different type. Typewriters didn't have different fonts. But hey, we're all idiots for believing such a thing.
Mikeultra
Why does Barry "what's his name", who was born on August 04, 1961 have a birth certificate number 61 10641?
This other person was born on August 23, 1961. Nineteen days later than Barry. But somehow has a birth certificate with a lower number 61 09945. It should have a higher number than Barry.
These numbered birth certificates are issued in sequential order. That's a spread of 696 souls. Is 696 a demonic number? How is this explained away? Now take a look at Mr. Kawasaki. He crashed into the sea and failed to issue a single mayday call. Suspicious looking character.
Next take a look at Ferdinand Puentas, he's not wearing a hat in this photo.
But here he is wearing a U.S. Marshals cap. A gift from the assassins for taking part in the hit?
My theory is that Loretta Fuddy was not even on that airplane. She was killed earlier on land and this production was put together to hide the hit. That explains why all these freaks were so calm when their plane "crashed".
Mikeultra
Why does Barry "what's his name", who was born on August 04, 1961 have a birth certificate number 61 10641?
Certificate numbers are known for a few births around the time of Obama’s and we find that the certificate numbers do not run in the same order as the registration dates.
Child Registrar General Date Certificate Number
Ah’nee, Johanna August 24 09945
Nordyke, Susan August 11 10637
Nordyke,Gretchen August 11 10638
Obama, Barack August 8 10641
Waidelich, Stig August 8 10920
Glancing at the list, it looks more like the completed certificates were sorted alphabetically by last name and numbered in a batch at the end of the month.
These numbered birth certificates are issued in sequential order.