It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What is "exactly why"? You start out saying "this" but never say what "this" is. You never make a point. You do ask a sort of rhetorical question, though. The answer is that they weren't being "good", that is why they got criticized. If everything was fine already, then it wouldn't have been necessary for Jesus to come in the first place, everyone could just follow the law. The problem is that the law can not make a person better on the inside.
You are paraphrasing. Paul says that we have all fallen short, past tense. And the "how hard we try" that Paul was talking about was following the old written Mosaic Law. His point was that the Jews and the gentiles are on a level playing field.
Paul is quoting from the Old Testament as an illustration for his point that even with the Law, the Jews are not really closer to being perfect. Just following the Law doesn't make you completely righteous. Paul said elsewhere that he was, by the law, blameless, but he reckoned it all as so much dung in comparison to the righteousness that is possible through Jesus.
OK, you just made that up. That was not the point that Paul was making. The Jews thought that they were better than the gentiles because they had the Law. Paul points out that even with the Law, they were still not there yet.
Think about Jesus and Nicodemus, how he had to tell him that he needed to be born again, even though he was a righteous person by the Law as interpreted by the Pharisees.
Apparently this is something you copied from a forum post. I don't think the person knows what they are talking about. If you want to make a point, then you should look it up yourself in a Jewish translation that wouldn't be influenced by the King James version.
All things "in heaven and earth", so it is not saying that he is the creator of the universe. All these things that are attributed to him are constructs of human psychology, the ideas of government and rulership.
Who? I just quoted the verse in Hebrews in my earlier post on this thread that says it was God.
Be good.
I quoted a sentence of yours right before that statement, " "The overwhelming message of the Bible is to be good to people living righteously." What exactly is righteous living to you? The point I was trying to make can be seen by reading Matthew 23. The Pharisees live by the Law better than most, which means the live by keeping God's commandments in attempt to be "perfect as the heavenly father is perfect." If this is the overwhelming message of the Bible why does Jesus dog the people who uphold the Law better than everyone else?
I would suggest that you try reading Romans to see what Paul is actually saying, rather than just hunting for things that you can twist to prove your little theories.
23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
He uses the past tense meaning all have sinned in there past not that sinning was a thing they ceased to do. Now, I will say in God's eyes believers no longer sin, but rather it is the sin that lives within them.
The point you seemed to be making was that it is not possible to be righteous.
The Law doesn't make you righteous at all...That is my point.
Yes.
I made it up? Shall we look at Romans 3 verse 10?
Become a Christian.
Yes one must be born again, and how is one to do that in your opinion ?
What source?
. . . just make this look like a red herring.
It wasn't even really about the subject that I was discussing.
. . . you attack the source.
No.
So Jesus created Heaven and Earth but not the universe is that what your saying?
Speaking of "intellectual", could you rephrase this as a sentence?
Lol you are removing John 3 from context and placing it with Hebrews. That is intellectually dishonest.
As opposed to another part of the human anatomy that the Jews thought was so crucial to salvation.
Romans 10:9-10, and 13
If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is by believing in your heart that you are made right with God, and it is by confessing with your mouth that you are saved ... For “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”
"Belonging" here is not a trivial matter and it means following the law of faith.
Romans 8:1
So now there is no condemnation for those who belong to Christ Jesus.
Paul is talking about those who have been "conformed to the image of his Son".
Romans 8:38-39
And I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from God’s love. Neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither our fears for today nor our worries about tomorrow—not even the powers of hell can separate us from God’s love. No power in the sky above or in the earth below—indeed, nothing in all creation will ever be able to separate us from the love of God that is revealed in Christ Jesus our Lord.
This is presenting a scene where Peter is telling "Israel" that if they repented from rejecting their Messiah, then that crime would be forgiven.
I believe you have misinterpreted the Greek text yourself here friend lets look at Acts.
Acts 3:19 says: "Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.
Literally, it means "repent".
The word most frequently translated "repent" in the Greek text throughout the NT is "mentanoeo", which literally means, “to change your mind; reconsider; or, to think differently.”
When does the devil lie that people have to be good? If you look at all the instances on the Bible of people being deceived, it is always that it is OK to be bad.
So when God tells us to repent and be saved he means to CHANGE YOUR MIND about how it is you are to be saved. It is not by works but by grace, and many will be deceived by the lie of the devil that you may work your way into heaven for Jesus will tell you he never knew you.
So, then you think that you can believe in Jesus and think that you can go and sin and feel good about it?
John 6
28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
To say Jesus's message was to live righteously, would mean Jesus lied here.
What source? The is a citation in your quote but it is from the Talmud
It wasn't even really about the subject that I was discussing. I already told you what to do about it. Unless you can refute it, my point stands, that the "Eternal Father" clause is not Old Testament, but medieval commentary that got grandfathered in.
No. It says that he created these things in heaven and earth, where you have to take it to mean that heaven and earth were already there, and Jesus created certain things in it.
Speaking of "intellectual", could you rephrase this as a sentence?
Faith is accepting the invitation. "Saved" has taken on a connotation that means something other than what it originally meant in the Bible. Pop-culture religion says that being saved is a guaranteed free ride to heaven. Ephesians goes on to say that we were saved to a life of good works, and that happens in the here and now, not in heaven.
This is presenting a scene where Peter is telling "Israel" that if they repented from rejecting their Messiah, then that crime would be forgiven.
So, then you think that you can believe in Jesus and think that you can go and sin and feel good about it?
That sounds pretty pessimistic.
. . . if I have one sin left on me when I get to Heaven that I deserve to be tossed to eternal punishment.
Back to your earlier external quote from a web site, in it a Dr. Price is saying that he has a Jewish translation, and quotes it as saying in part, "and his name shall be called "Wonderful counsellor of the mighty God, of the everlasting Father, of the Prince of peace".
The source I posted as a reference to where I pulled that information. It presents information that can be checked out. If you have a problem with it argue with the information not tell me that he doesn't know what he is talking about because he makes a reference to owning a Talmud.....
It looks like the direct reference to the son stops at the word, shoulder. From there, it is God who is the subject, the Wondrous Adviser (and so on), who calls the son, "Prince of Peace".
For a child has been born to us, a son given to us, and the authority is upon his shoulder, and the wondrous adviser, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, called his name, "the prince of peace."
www.chabad.org...
In this Jewish translation, the "father" attribute is given to God.
. . . there is still a name for the Father there. John one attributes all of creation to the Word(which John 1 later tells us is Christ).
There is a disconnect here based on apparently some reading comprehension problems.
That is exactly what I am saying it does not say.....? I said Jesus is the CREATOR of ALL things, that would include Heaven and Earth? So quit putting words in my mouth.
That is very uninformative, so I can't hardly respond to it.
You(subject) are removing(verb) John 3 from context and placing it with Hebrews.
That is your personal theory completely detached from any Bible teaching.
Faith is believing that Jesus sacrifice was sufficient enough to cleanse all of mankind's sins.
"NO ONE IS RIGHTEOUS" is an Old Testament quote Paul gave as an example of a situation which existed when there was just the old written Mosaic Law.
If one must first have faith, and then live a life of good works(which I have already quoted passages that say NO ONE IS RIGHTEOUS-and that our righteous acts are as filthy rags) then you are saying that Jesus only made it possible for me to work my sin off; not that he saved me from my sin.
That isn't what was being described in Acts.
Doesn't it make sense that Peter would tell Israel that if the act of repentance is changing your mind about needing a savior?
No, I don't.
You are the one who seems to think that Jesus requires a "working off" of sin not me...
jmdewey60
reply to post by ServantOfTheLamb
No, I don't.
You are the one who seems to think that Jesus requires a "working off" of sin not me...
You are the one who thinks that sin is a debt that has to be paid.
You just think someone else pays it.
My point is that is a theory that comes from Augustine, and not the Bible, so you are actually promoting Catholic doctrine, without even realizing it.
The Bible says we are saved to good works, if you think otherwise, then you are putting human philosophy above the word of God.
Salvation was the giving of the spirit and commission to the disciples after he had risen and ascended to the Father and returned to give that authority to found the church.
How exactly do you believe one achieves salvation friend?
Everything above verse 19 in your quote was Paul using Old Testament passages that show that the old written Mosaic Law doesn't make people righteous.
19 Now we know that whatever the Law says, it speaks to those who are under the Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all the world may become accountable to God; 20 because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight; for through the Law comes the knowledge of sin.
All men were sinners according to the Old Testament which Paul was calling the Law, meaning the old written Mosaic Law.
Remember the point I am trying to make is that all men are sinners. The bold part above says the for those who believe in the atonement of Christ there is no distinction between any man on earth, because "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." I do not know how else to interpret this other than all men are sinners, . . .
Romans 3:21
. . . and then verse 24 will tell us that those who believe are justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus.
Romans 3:31
Paul then goes on to explain how God has not abolished the Law, but established the Law.
No, you have that wrong. Have you ever even looked a book, ever, about the New Testament or Paul's writings in particular, or Romans specifically?
He then goes on to explain how people under the Old Law were saved by faith as well. He uses Abraham as an example in Romans 4. Another example of OT people being saved by faith is Noah. In reality it is not Noah's building of the Ark that saves Him, but rather his FAITH in God to listen and build the boat that saves him. The work was a result of FAITH not the other way around.
In your post, you quote Romans 6:20-23. I will go ahead and quote the same but starting with verse 19, in the 2011 NIV just because I think this is like the recognized standard version, even if it doesn't have the word "standard" in its title.
I also believe that sin has a punishment and this is why salvation is needed.
Those are metaphors, in reference to the comparison between a natural birth that gets you into the "saved" tribe, and the unnatural "birth" that gets you into the saved congregation, the church.
The Bible speaks of two births and two deaths. The first birth and death are of our physical bodies, and the second birth and death are spiritual.
What are you using as the definition of "salvation"?
Salvation is meant only to save us from the second death.
"Salvation" as defined in the Bible, as opposed to how it is frequently used in modern pop-culture religion, is inclusion in a group blessed by God, where in the Old Testament it would be being an Israelite, and in the New Testament it would be being a member of the church, or what we would call today, a Christian.
How is salvation achieved(which is the question I asked you)?
colbe
There are many verses in the OT and NT that state the fact, it is faith AND works with the help God's grace that justifies you. Here is one.
Matthew 7:21
Not every one that saith to me, Lord, Lord (faith), shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: but he that DOTH (works) the will of my Father who is in heaven, he shall enter into the kingdom of heaven.
There is a group of Christians (Protestants) following Martin Luther's heresy of Sola Fide that came from Luther's head not God
The Bible was compiled by the Church, the "one faith" of Eph 4:5 -Roman Catholicism- established by Christ. Protestantism accepts Pope Damasus' choices for the NT Canon. They've made a Catholic book their authority. Too bad, 1 Timothy 3:15 says the pillar and foundation of Truth is the Church not the Bible.
1 Timothy 3:15
King James Version (KJV)
15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the CHURCH of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.