NSA surveillance is constitutional and legal. I know, I'm so unpopular right now, page 3

posted on Feb, 16 2014 @ 11:17 AM

link

And another

www.theguardian.com...

looks like nsa broke client privilege.

posted on Feb, 16 2014 @ 12:19 PM

link

Let's start with the legal system and the Foreign Intelligence Survillance Act (FISA) and its courts.The FISA court only serve to authorize warrants, not collection methods. This court has nothing to do with determining what's legal, just what justifies warrants.

Well that's interesting...Forget the law, forget the Constitution, just determine if (a) justifies (b)...

bonecrusher321

posted on Aug, 8 2014 @ 12:34 PM

link

The NSA is an intelligence agency. They don't have clients.a reply to: grey580

bonecrusher321

posted on Aug, 8 2014 @ 12:36 PM

link

Um no, they don't forget anything. Probable cause must be shown to obtain a warrant. Constitution, law etc comes into play if and when there is an arrest, investigation, trial etc. that's how all warrants work everywhere no matter who asks for it.a reply to: Iscool

bonecrusher321

posted on Aug, 8 2014 @ 12:38 PM

link

Good thing for me I haven't shared my opinions nor am I defending. Just sharing law as it exists to your "poorly informed."a reply to: Wrabbit2000

bonecrusher321

posted on Aug, 8 2014 @ 12:40 PM

link

I guess it's what you think supersede is. Your words not mine. I hope you don't mean something silly like not being in the constitution. Then we'd have to let all the drug dealers, rapists etc. out since those laws are not in the constitution. a reply to: captaintyinknots