It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Washington (CNN) -- A senior Iranian naval official says Iran is sending warships toward U.S. maritime borders to send a message, a move a U.S. defense official characterized as an announcement, not a deployment.
"Iran's military fleet is approaching the United States' maritime borders, and this move has a message," Adm. Afshin Rezayee Haddad said, the semiofficial Fars news agency reported Saturday.
The plan, according to Fars, is a response to the United States beefing up its naval presence in the Persian Gulf. The U.S. 5th Fleet is based in Bahrain.
Haddad said the Iranian fleet was under way and approaching the Atlantic Ocean "via the waters near South Africa," a claim that has not been confirmed.
It's not the first time Iran has made such a threat, said the U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
"It's important to understand that, at this point, we have an announcement not a deployment. They've stated this aspiration before," said the defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.
In 2011, Iran twice announced plans to send ships toward the U.S. maritime borders.
"Freedom of the seas doesn't just apply to fish. It applies to all maritime nations, all navies, everywhere -- so long as they understand the responsibilities which come with that freedom," the defense official said.
"So if they chose to send their ships to the Atlantic, I'm sure they won't be surprised to find many, many others already there."
The Iranian navy is the smallest of its military forces, according to GlobalSecurity.org, which tracks defense and intelligence issues.
Montana
I guess my response would be "And?"
There isn't a blessed thing they could do there. Without nuclear warheads (or biological or chemical) the type of ships the Iranian Navy has are absolutely no threat to the US. This move would very much fall under the law that says " It is foolish to play to your adversary's strength".
Wrabbit2000
They could at least make a statement worthy of the effort ...but they even took the trip around the Cape of Good Hope to get back up here. Umm.. Okay.. Taking the scenic route just for the heck of it? Their crew will be tired and on the wrong end of their cruise, at the wrong time to be there as they cross at the close point.
Rosinitiate
Wrabbit2000
They could at least make a statement worthy of the effort ...but they even took the trip around the Cape of Good Hope to get back up here. Umm.. Okay.. Taking the scenic route just for the heck of it? Their crew will be tired and on the wrong end of their cruise, at the wrong time to be there as they cross at the close point.
Or maybe their travels have nothing to do with the US and the nonstory is engineered propaganda......
jhn7537
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Well, isn't Russia always the wild card when discussing Iran and Syria??
Montana
reply to post by jhn7537
The average Iranian is no dummy. They are more than capable of figuring out the size and capabilities of the respective naval forces. The internet works there, too. Unfortunately, the people this will impress are the repressives that live in caves and think anything invented after the death of Muhammad is satanic. They are also the ones with guns and explosive tuxedos.
jhn7537
Rosinitiate
Wrabbit2000
They could at least make a statement worthy of the effort ...but they even took the trip around the Cape of Good Hope to get back up here. Umm.. Okay.. Taking the scenic route just for the heck of it? Their crew will be tired and on the wrong end of their cruise, at the wrong time to be there as they cross at the close point.
Or maybe their travels have nothing to do with the US and the nonstory is engineered propaganda......
Well, that's where the whole false flag thing comes in... The US media begins to show that Iran is becoming more aggressive, strategically placing ships, military, etc. and then some US target gets hit, all blame goes on Iran, because they find a Iranian passport that survived a jet fuel fire, and then we go to war...
Snarl
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
One has to ask themselves: "Why is this even in the news?" Is there a policy message here?