It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the point where it first turned to disgust for me was when the USA raised the "allowable amount" of radiation exposure deemed safe for humans literally, days after the disaster happened.
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which monitors food safety, says it is aware of the numbers but says the amounts of cesium detected are small.
"Approximately 60 per cent of fish have shown to have detectable levels of radionuclides," it said in an emailed statement.
According to the Global Research Report, recent tests in California have unearthed contaminated blue-fin tuna in nearby coastal waters. It is believed that the contaminated water has finally reached the western coastline due to the growth of radioactive iodine levels which are now 200 times what they were two years ago. In addition, the caesium-137 level has also gone up along the California, Oregon and Washington coasts, discovered in local mushrooms and berries. Residents have also noted that the number of bird deaths has risen. In Alaska, the sockeye salmon population has declined apparently due to radionuclides as well.
Why is that a shame? Do you want there to be unsafe levels of radiation?
It's a shame I'm not able to show you any further MSM media sources but they all state that the radiation levels will be safe.
It's talking about fish imported from Japan.
Since a tsunami and earthquake destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant last March, radioactive cesium has consistently been found in 60 to 80 per cent of Japanese fishing catches each month, as tested by Japan's Fisheries Agency.
No. It isn't. www.abovetopsecret.com...
The west coast of the United States is being absolutely fried by radiation from the Fukushima nuclear disaster
Mamatus
reply to post by Phage
Kinda fun watching what seems to be a mini flag war. A bit disappointing (but expected) to see the one with the misleading title doing so well. Not that it is about winning, as it is not, It is about where this sites proverbial "head" is at lately.
Amusing regardless, as simple logic defies so many. Fun to see you playing for a minute though.
I don't. But do I feel strongly about separating fact from fabrication.
Why do you feel so strongly about disproving this?
I have no idea. What do you think people gain by claiming that December 21, 2012 was some big deal? What do you think people gain by claiming that a comet is going to destroy us and "they" are hiding it from us?
What do you think people gain by saying there is more to this story than the MSM is telling us?
flammadraco
reply to post by Phage
Is it your belief that the radiation from Fukushima will have no ill effect on the world despite still spewing radiation into the oceans each day?
I have no reason at this time to think it will cause worldwide problems (or even problems on the west coast of North America).
Is it your belief that the radiation from Fukushima will have no ill effect on the world despite still spewing radiation into the oceans each day?
I'm not spreading rumours.
flammadraco
Bazart
reply to post by flammadraco
I wish there could be one Fukashima thread on this ... ' IDIOT PSYCHOPATHIC NUKE-HEADS DO IT AGAIN ! '
News at 11 ( or whenever there is any ). On Fantasy Island , a midget screams , ' THE PLUME , THE PLUME ! ' ... but , the damn thing never seems to get there .
Not sure how to take your post. If your saying there is no evidence to this OP, then read the links. The evidence has been available since 2012 that radiation from Japan has already arrived on US shores either via the atmosphere or oceans.