It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: The GUT
originally posted by: 1ofthe9
Did you catch that he was the one who pointed Emenegger at the Holloman stuff?
Wow. No, i didn't. That's pretty huge in my thinking.
How do you rate the source?
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
After all, integrity isn't top priority for the fool on his journey to dusty death. I sometimes think integrity is an oxymoron. Why is it that those who live by the code and profess integrity and honor are the same that drop bombs and tomahawk cruise missiles? I'd probably piss on integrity if I ever saw it for my simple cynical mind may mistake it for ego.
I was a very minor missionary, actually a heretic, but I toiled wholeheartedly in the vinyards because it was fun, fun, fun. Where else could a red-blooded American boy lie, kill, cheat, steal, rape, and pillage with the sanction and blessing of the All-Highest?
"This morning we left the Queen Mary, driving to Bob and Margaret Emenegger fine house in Hollywood for lunch. Bob confirmed that his involvement with the Pentagon started when Jack Verona, who told him how to set up the program, wrote the first letter and give him access to Holloman."
originally posted by: 1ofthe9
Well I've just finished Stratagem. Suffice to say that readers of this thread will enjoy it - Vallee basically explains interactions with a control system via scifi narrative. It is definitely tinged with his experiences in Silicon Valley and Brazil. Cheerier ending then Fastwalker.
He also makes use of Redfern's Unit 731/Roswell theory. Thought that was pretty cool.
originally posted by: tetra50
But I'd like to point this little trick out, within Wiener's analogy, recognizing, of course, that it's only an analogy…
However, regardless of that fact, this fact still remains: Cement is the antithesis of forward movement.
originally posted by: Willtell
You know what that means?
Communication is central to identifying the nature of problems, additionally one sided view points, cherry picking of data are revealed via discussion. Assuming sufficient enquiring minds, who verify information for themselves and check sources by hitting the books rather than just Google. By drawing on printed resources, in our own homes, from libraries, rather than those already available on the internet, as most threads do, we have a much better chance of getting the right mixture and balance of information required to counter any form of disinformation or misdirection. And, more importantly, we have a much better chance of finding a workable solution to what the future holds in store for us and of turning that into affirmative action.
originally posted by: tetra50
My analogy about concrete, perhaps, was not meant to be taken so literally, but applied in a wider sense as to stagnation. If you have your own POV, it can quickly become bias, and so you will seek, naturally,to confirm it, and disregard all that doesn't fit its particular set. This is the danger of the concrete analogy. Though I am sure you are more than bright enough to have understood I meant this.
originally posted by: tetra50
Good luck to you in all you endeavor. Perhaps you will be the mind that sets us free.
originally posted by: RedCairo
originally posted by: Willtell
You know what that means?
I'm not sure. Since the public is allegedly at least 40 years behind black ops, does their writing about this stuff imply that they're all way ahead of it by now and there is little worry in sharing this much?
Maybe there is nothing more to say, or maybe they have, despite their public enthusiasm, hit about the same private wall nearly everybody else has. There is a point where information just basically peters out, not because it doesn't exist but because it just isn't available.