posted on Nov, 21 2004 @ 02:33 PM
I agree with you..... kinda.....
A better way to say it might be "The UN is not SUPPOSED to be", or "was not DESIGNED to be", or "has no business TRYING to be". Whatever the
original intent was, that doen't change what a large number of the delegates are trying to make the UN into.
Anytime members of the UN spout off about a member nation not having "UN APPROVAL" for an action, (right or wrong doesn't matter here. That's a
separate issue) they are implying that the UN somehow has the power or authority over a country's political actions. This leads me to think that the
UN BELIEVES it has some type of control over individual member states, which is one defenition of 'world government'.
[edit on 11/21/2004 by Montana]