Presenting Interstallar spaceships and twenty miles long UFO on the moon

Well there you go, some of the most mind blowing footage of all time, captured by astronomer Jose Escamilla with high tech equipment.

Lets start with the interstellar ships that are flying around between the stars.
interstellar a film by Jose Escamilla. Full recognition goes out to John Lenard Walson for discovering these entities, for developing the means to capture them and for having the integrity to get this important information out to the people




collection of stills from some of the interstellar ships in the movie










And now ... I want to include the footage of the twenty miles long unknown object on the surface of the moon


This is the clearest in focus footage of a space ship twenty miles long that was filmed by Apollo 17 on December 1972. Since then it has not appeared on photos before and after this one was taken. Who or what was piloting this ship must have been enormous...OR maybe small...???

So ATS what are those ? Surely its not swamp gas mirrors all of it.. or is it

Spacespider

I dunno, I'm a 'Want to believe' kinda person but when I watch this video it reminds me of 'Eye Floaters' which tells me that maybe it's not out in space but some sort of defect/dust/something on or near the lens that gives the illusion of something out there.

Couple of pennies.

Still want to believe though.

hasn't johns stuff already been through the grinder?

funBox

reply to post by SLAYER69


Looks like the sulaco or maybe a nebulon b assault frigate.

Adama and the Colonies have finally arrived

Seriously, if there were ships in orbit, why havent amateur astronomers found em yet??

There is no way any one in here could tell what it is, some HD footage would have been helpfull, but that ain't going to happen.

We can only say WOW and speculate, not knowing if it's fake or what.

The 20 mile spaceship Nah, i don't think so.

Jose Escamilla is a known hoaxer....

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I like Jose Escamilla's work, it's easy on the eye and he chooses the right music for his videos.
The one in the OP has got be now over 6 years old? Which makes me ask a question:
If he filmed these 6 years ago or even earlier, then why no new material?
Cameras and telescopes have advanced even further since then, he could of been onto a winner but chose to ignore it since the release of "Interstellar".

Mianeye
There is no way any one in here could tell what it is, some HD footage would have been helpfull, but that ain't going to happen.

We can only say WOW and speculate, not knowing if it's fake or what.

The 20 mile spaceship

Nah, i don't think so.

edit on 20-1-2014 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)

Well.. you get what you get, if we knew what it was it would not be UFO´s anymore..
just thought I would share, ohh and why do you disbelieve the object shown on the moon.. is it to "fantastic" for you to believe ?

skyblueworld
I like Jose Escamilla's work, it's easy on the eye and he chooses the right music for his videos.
The one in the OP has got be now over 6 years old? Which makes me ask a question:
If he filmed these 6 years ago or even earlier, then why no new material?
Cameras and telescopes have advanced even further since then, he could of been onto a winner but chose to ignore it since the release of "Interstellar".

He say he uses a special technique, perhaps the technique require certain equipment and / or there have not been any new sightings since then ? who knows

Vasa Croe
Jose Escamilla is a known hoaxer....

www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 1/20/14 by Vasa Croe because: (no reason given)

The only thing the thread you link to is about is a ats member saying he is a hoax because he don´t agree with Steven Greer

Cant see how this is relevant to anything, since Steven Greer is indeed a "proven" hoaxer

reply to post by Spacespider

Well.. you get what you get, if we knew what it was it would not be UFO´s anymore..

True

just thought I would share, ohh and why do you disbelieve the object shown on the moon.. is it to "fantastic" for you to believe ?

Yes, kind of, but i have studied a lot of claimed buildings and other stuff on the moon, and there is nothing that has me convinced yet, and that one is one of those that just look like tricks of light and shadows in lo def.

Hey, i am just a skeptic believer

I don’t think Jose Escamilla is an astronomer.
To me, pictures look like out of focus ISS

looks like rock/crater to me. not a 20 mile spaceship.

reply to post by Pauligirl


well the space satalites were filmed/hoaxed by

jlw youtube channel

could have swore this has been debated, what conclusions were drawn I do not know

funBox

I remember watching this doco or one like it several years ago. At the time I recall thinking it was some of the most amazing footage I've ever seen. There are even some clips of the objects transforming and changing shape within a matter of seconds. Some of the objects captured certainly do look like some type of craft, and the range of different objects in the doco makes it unlikely they were filming out of focus satellites around the Earth imo.

But I'm certainly not convinced of the veracity of the doco and the footage shown in it. In this wide world of hoaxes one must always remain skeptical. But that also means one must remain skeptical of any claims that this is a hoax without any good proof that it is a hoax. I haven't really looked very deep into this footage so I will be following this thread to see if there are any interesting sources of information about it being a hoax.

I've seen these before.

I think these have been debunked as out-of-focus pics/footage, and the 'changing shapes' are due to the photographer changing the focus whilst filming.

reply to post by Spacespider


I am not even going to go into how often these images may have been debated over before, what conclusions were drawn about the motivations behind their creation, or any of that. What I want to know is this...

What distance, are these objects supposed to have been from the planet Earth, at the time that each was recorded by the equipment used?

You see, calling them interstellar ships, if they were not found to be any further away than say, the edge of our solar system, is basically making a massive assumption. Interstellar space begins when the edge of our solar system has been left behind, and one travels in raw space. That is, the space between our solar system, and other star systems, hence the name, interstellar.

If these objects were recorded in our solar system, then by definition, they should be called interplanetary, and even calling them spaceships might be a leap. For all the person who allegedly recorded these things can possibly know, they could be sentient, organic things, ejected from the impossible atmosphere of Jupiter like spores from a mushroom.

Basically, the assumptions that Escamillia is jumping to about his discoveries, call into question the entire claim that he is making, and I for one find that distinctly fishy.

reply to post by Spacespider


I remember seeing this discussed before.


www.abovetopsecret.com...