Newtown shooter may have called radio show year before attack, newspaper says

matafuchs
This was an old school in an area where the last thing they were expecting was this. Chicago needs cameras everywhere but a small elementary school in Connecticut? I don't see a need. Maybe in the parking lot and there was one. To add some security it seems they had a two way otosee who was there at the entry. My question is where is the footage of the camera on the roof?FOIA should provide that now that the case is closedand the FBI was involved.

Ya that's the camera i was referencing as well. As it would have seen what happened at the start of everything seemingly very clearly. And i just find it weird that they would have it in that great vantage point with no capability to record since it is choke point of who comes in/out of the school...

reply to post by matafuchs


Point it, they had recently got a new camera system, and didn't bother to have it record. Makes no sense. Even my cheap ass BOCES school had cameras that recorded the entrances. And that was back in 1999-2001.

matafuchs
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman

 

Actually, there are videos of the school as well as Lanzas home post shooting. They are out there...

No photos of him in the van and him arming himself.

None.

No photos of his mom buying the weapons either.

matafuchs

Sremmos80
reply to post by matafuchs

 

I never said of him shooting, please quote me if i did. I said videos of him pre (before) shooting. Like him walking in or getting out of the car with the arsenal that he had on him. My school had cameras EVERYWHERE and that was 10 years ago, columbine had videos of the people walking around the school....
Lives were lost and everyone deserves to know everything that happened, not redacted official stories that once everyone gets a chance to examine is left with more questions then answers

edit on thMon, 20 Jan 2014 17:29:48 -0600America/Chicago120144880 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)

I was asking a question. Chill out man.

He is real. As real as can be. He killed those kids. Case Closed. It is hard to swallow but there is evil such as him out there.

The most odd thing found in the investigation was this tidbit...

At age 10, according to the report, Lanza helped write a book that includes characters who kill children, carry bags full of guns and say they enjoy hurting people, “especially children.” The “Big Book of Granny” was apparently written as part of a fifth-grade class assignment.

There is no hard proof of him killing anyone.

Just opinion.

No video of him killing anyone and no video of him in the van arming himself. None.
No video of him or his mom buying the firearms. No photos. Nothing.

Prove that he was there with hard physical proof or admit your wrong and you do not know if he killed anyone.

matafuchs
reply to post by Sremmos80

 

Videos of the shooting? Him shooting? Good luck...

There's no evidence whatsoever that anything happened there. Just a Dog and Pony show from the Lamestream Media.

I honestly think Sandy Hook was a False Flag along with another seemingly bogus event the Boston Bombing!

Remember this fact! Obama and Co want to disarm the US population!

So how will the do it? By force? That would depend on the US Military. Would they be willing to shoot their own countrymen? Some will! There are some psychos in the Military alright! And others won't. Is that why there are reports of high ranking officers being sh*t canned from the forces?

So again how will they do it? They need to change the gun laws. Create enough bogus attacks especially on children and some people will gladly give up their guns. Especially those lovely AR-15's. The big guns they want gotten rid of. The small ones they can handle but the bigger ones they can't!

How many of these attacks are done by small weapons? Not a lot I shouldn't think! The Washington Harbor farce was another False Flag one. Especially because the conducted an exact same drill a week before. Hold on a sec. Weren't they doing a Sandy Hook drill too? Hmmm I'm sure I heard that somewhere!

And they all seem to happen in States that are Gun Controlled!

Was this latest one in Maryland done in a Gun Controlled State?

I'm from the UK so I don't know!

reply to post by Sremmos80

And those at the school can be easily told the didn't or did see something in that high stress time. Those agencies have great tricks to get you to say what they want while making you believe what you are telling them. Not mind control or anything like that. I'm talking conman tactics.

Wouldn't that be quite risky for the agency, if they could get caught? That kind of tactic might work just fine, when only one individual is tricked at a time, but its use might still be restricted to messing with the iconic memory (fast-decaying store of visual information). Besides, at schools there might be a savant or two, who could be able to remember "everything". Or maybe some of pupils/students has (certain type of) aphasia and thus he might be very sensitive to the tone of voice, vocal color and body language of the one, who is trying to fake his memories. After feeling that there was something really strange and wrong about the man, who tried to talk to him, he goes straight to his teacher or tutor.

smarko
reply to post by Sremmos80

 

And those at the school can be easily told the didn't or did see something in that high stress time. Those agencies have great tricks to get you to say what they want while making you believe what you are telling them. Not mind control or anything like that. I'm talking conman tactics.

Wouldn't that be quite risky for the agency, if they could get caught? That kind of tactic might work just fine, when only one individual is tricked at a time, but its use might still be restricted to messing with the iconic memory (fast-decaying store of visual information). Besides, at schools there might be a savant or two, who could be able to remember "everything". Or maybe some of pupils/students has (certain type of) aphasia and thus he might be very sensitive to the tone of voice, vocal color and body language of the one, who is trying to fake his memories. After feeling that there was something really strange and wrong about the man, who tried to talk to him, he goes straight to his teacher or tutor.

Risky? Hardly... Encouraged, most definitely. They do it to get confessions out of people or to get people to tell them what they want to hear. It is no secret, that is you have the right to remain silent because anything and everything you say will be used against you.
Again the tricks they use aren't faking memories or anything like that, rather coaching and using leading questions. You the things a lawyer would not allow in a court of law. So the smart kids wouldn't need to read the body language or the eyes or anything like that. And even if they did go to a teach or tutor, what are they going to do? Write a formal complaint to the fbi/cia? Or get told, " welcome to life, that is what LEO and Fed LEO do" they lie and trick you to get you to say what they want.

Here's a news story I've just seen and heard that paints another questionable picture about Sandy Hook.

School Safety Expert Threatened for Questioning Sandy Hook

‘Wolfgang W. Halbig doesn’t believe anyone was killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012, and he’s looking for some answers. So many answers, in fact, that he was paid a visit by some police investigators telling him to back off.

Mr. Halbig isn’t your average “conspiracy theorist.” He’s worked in public education as a teacher, dean, assistant principal, principal of an alternative school and as the Director for School Safety and Security for the Seminole County Public Schools, a school district of approximately 65,000 students.’

See this kind of thing raises more eyebrows. You don't go around threatening experts that have questions about the Official Story! If he has any viable questions then you look to find the answers. Threatening someone only strengthens the case of a False Flag Conspiracy!

Here's the Podcast for this story:

americanfreepress.net...

reply to post by stevcolx


Man this is a great podcast, this guy is getting threatened with a felony for trying to get info through the FOIA!? Its funny how LEO is all about the "if you have nothing to hide then you have no problem showing me" until it is on them lol

reply to post by Sremmos80


Well you know what it's like. If it is true then the authorities do their best to cover it up!

Look at all the witnesses who died through the usual CIA assisted suicides after 9/11. Dr David Kelly in Britain after exposing the Iraq Invasion Lies another assisted suicide! Or the threats Keith Allen received from MI5/MI6 during and after the Diana Murder documentary 'Unlawful Killing'. Or Bill Cooper who was shot by police outside his home in November 2001 after he predicted 9/11.

If people are being threatened and or killed then it's a good bet the Conspiracy is true!

reply to post by stevcolx


I absolutely loved hearing that podcast. Thank you for posting that.

I don't understand how the silly believers just ignore the obvious
questions. I myself have looked for the name of the company that
cleaned up Sandy Hook. There isn't one. Common public knowledge
that is completely unattainable.

reply to post by randyvs


Well here's more on the story of Wolfgang Habig:

Former Florida state trooper Woolfgang Halbig does not believe that ANYONE was killed at the Sandy Hook gun confiscation hoax and has done the research to prove it. Not only does he believe that no one was killed there but he has ALSO been threatened for exposing this horribly played out hoax. KateSlate11 gives us her take on this new bombshell information in the first video below while the second video contains the entire interview with this wise man, an interview that must go viral for Americans to finally take back our country from the criminals who have stolen it away. Sandy Hook WAS an attempt to TAKE Americans guns and forever enslave us; this interview goes a long way towards proving that fact.

San dy Hook Lies Come Crashing Down

Hope he doesn't become another Bill Cooper and get's himself assassinated!

reply to post by stevcolx


One thing about the older guys, they become more and more that way
because they lived already. I feel it myself, I would do the same thing
in the hopes of preserving a way of life for the youngers come in up.

I'd like to follow him around and try to watch his back. That might be fun.

Well this thread has died a death just like the official story. Nobody else got something to offer?

Corruption Exposed
reply to post by jaffo

 

"Newtown shooter may have called radio show year before attack, newspaper says"

The word "may" is not very decisive, especially when it is a newspaper sensationalizing a story for headlines.

The Bible "may" be real.

Aliens "may" exist"

Pink unicorns "may" give me rides to work every day, we just never know...

Do yo catch my drift yet?

Sorry OP this isn't going to silence anyone.

i also like how they said point blank in the video that they couldn't independently verify that it was actually him...at least they're being honest about it..

one discrepancy that popped right out at me is that they said that 2 of his friends said it was him...what's off about that is that when it's convenient, the media reports he had no friends, and that he was a lone nut, and then again, when it's convenient, and it suits their purposes, he magically has friends, that can confirm things for them...

jaffo
Clearly you have made up your mind and will not let facts stand on the way. Nor will you entertain any possibility that you might be wrong.

and you've clearly done the same.

there are so many holes in the official story, so many discrepancies, so much guess work....i must know, have you even taken the time to go over any of the material released by the CTSP?

haven123
If anyone wants to read and find out quite convincingly that it is indeed Adam lanza here is the original source of these claims
sandyhooklighthouse.wordpress.com...

if the nsa would come up with the records that they have it might help

TKDRL
reply to post by haven123

 

And, finally, some random insights into the shooter’s warped psyche:

Is his psyche really that "warped"? Hell, I think about a lot of that kind of stuff all the time.... Does that make me a potential mass murderer?

edit on Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:52:22 -0600 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)

of course it does....because being smart, articulate, and thinking for yourself, OUTSIDE the box, makes you dangerous as hell..

wouldn't want you to make any waves, or possibly shake people's convictions...

Maxmars
At the risk of falling on deaf ears, we must not fear to scrutinize the denial of the event.

My predecessors, my contemporaries, and those who work with me generally, are exceedingly protective of the hurt that the Sandy Hook massacre inflicted. There is a valid and rational reason for that; I would hardly imagine it needs much elaboration.

Unlike many; my assignment of blame over the inconsistencies of the tragedy falls squarely on the 'professional' media class.

It was they who threw journalism out the window and began a mad media feeding frenzy, where people just listen to them babble, show the same clips of poorly informed bystanders over and over, and repeated the same blathering irrelevancies via their 'experts,' who knew no more about the event than any other reasonably-informed citizen. They "crafted" presentations used 'stock' photos which were unsuitable for comparisons... they created narrative that kept the answers to important questions from being aired until prime time when their diva broadcasters could have their people create soundtracks and info-graphics that looked "cool."

The net result was the furious clamoring for truth from people who were never going to give it to us; and that truth would not have generated hundreds of hours of for-profit new coverage.

Yup..., I blame the professional information peddlers. Same as I blame them for the moronic notion of the 'political correctness' meme; which is almost entirely their own creation (them and the ... well let's call them the CFR.)

it was exactly the same with 9/11, which lead to a LOT of the initial confusion about the event as it was unfolding...

it was only AFTER the media frenzy died down, that real information started coming out, and dots could be correctly connected, and a reasonable, rational, logical narrative could be uncovered...

that's kinda what's happening now....now, a year and change later, information is coming to the surface, and when cataloged and cross-referenced with all other available reliable information, now it's getting much easier to see what may have actually taken place there....

now, i'm not saying nobody died..unless there is (i'm sorry in advance) absolutely bulletproof evidence that such is the case, saying it's indeed true would be callous, not to mention ignorant, and inappropriate....

an agenda was propelled by 9/11, and one is being propelled by this event.

we owe it to ourselves, and to the people who died, to make sure that what we're being told is true, and not simply take whatever they feed us at face value....

WhiteAlice
reply to post by Sremmos80

 

Why not? Is it that impossible to believe that someone would target some of our most vulnerable within society? What about the man in China who stabbed 22 school children in 2012? Or, more locally, what about Timothy McVeigh who blew up a building in OKC while it contained a class of children on a field trip and viewed them as being "collateral damage"? Why is it so difficult to believe that one young man could do something so reprehensible when we have had others do just as reprehensible acts to the same type of victims?

allegedly....there are still a lot of questions, inconsistencies, mysterious deaths, and whatnot, surrounding OKC.

yes, people do go nuts, people do crazy things, people sometimes do horrible things.....i think the point that was trying to be made is that we can't just simply believe everything we're told, especially when it is such an outrageous, and egregious offense....we MUST double check everything, and not simply get in line, and onboard with the recommended groupthink.