Something (Curiosity Rover) has moved on Mars!, page 2

Indigent

posted on Jan, 15 2014 @ 11:14 AM

link

(post by MadMax9 removed for a manners violation)

AlphaHawk

posted on Jan, 16 2014 @ 03:43 AM

link

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Arken

Nasa lies we all know that and?

Yet, this thread is a hoax.

Oh who to believe!

35Foxtrot

posted on Jan, 16 2014 @ 05:33 AM

link

Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

expatwhite

posted on Jan, 16 2014 @ 05:36 AM

link

35Foxtrot
Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

I agree

Hoaxing and plain stupidity are 2 completely different things

(Sorry Arken!)

DJW001

posted on Jan, 16 2014 @ 05:38 AM

link

35Foxtrot
Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

Perhaps the Mods are trying to motivate Arken to exercise more critical thinking before he posts.

35Foxtrot

posted on Jan, 16 2014 @ 05:45 AM

link

DJW001

35Foxtrot
Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

Perhaps the Mods are trying to motivate Arken to exercise more critical thinking before he posts.

If so, that's cool I guess. But to me, rules is rules. If they did want to do as you suggest, a PM might be better?

raymundoko

posted on Jan, 16 2014 @ 11:28 AM

link

reply to post by 35Foxtrot

Arken regularly posts pictures of rocks claiming them to be other things. At this point I'd be happy if all his posts got hoaxed.

Arken

posted on Jan, 16 2014 @ 12:47 PM

link

DJW001

35Foxtrot
Hey. Quick question...

I'm sure it is in the Terms & Conditions somewhere, but I can't get motivated to look for myself. What're the regs for declaring something a "Hoax?" I mean, to me, a hoax is a willful misleading. In the case of this thread, I doubt Arken seriously tried to willfully mislead anyone... I mean have you seen some of the rocks he thinks are "evidence" of past/current life on Mars?! I can believe he honestly believed what he was posting...

Perhaps the Mods are trying to motivate Arken to exercise more critical thinking before he posts.

I take this advice in full consideration.
Thanks.

edit on 16-1-2014 by Arken because: (no reason given)