The JFK Assassination----NASA and USAEC Roles-----50 Years is long Enough

network dude
reply to post by AngryCymraeg

 

And in response to that, He shall post paragraph after paragraph of utter tripe and mention how evil masons are every third paragraph.
(I just saved him some time)

They're mean and stinky too! (You left out that part.)

reply to post by network dude


Anyone can listen to the entire speech and make up their own minds. JFK was speaking of all kinds of secrecy, the proper and improper use of secrecy. For the improper use of secrecy JFK chose the wordings that talk about the Masons. imho

JFK spoke of the effective and proper use of the press to keep things honest in the world, and such can be used in the Abe Lincoln Reporting, In the JFK reporting per why they called his presidency Camelot, after King Author's version of Democracy that came from Essene / Celtic values that were evidenced near Cornwall, then the Avalon area of Glastonbury, and in the region of Scotland at Sterling Castle and the Round Table historically cited as being there. imho

reply to post by MagnumOpus


Check your spelling. You mean King Arthur, not King Author. And once again - there is absolutely no proof of a Romano British king having a round table. Nothing. Nada. Nowt. NO PROOF. It's a load of medieval story-telling. I do however notice that you've admitted defeat in your claim that he was Scottish and are now referring to the region of Scotland near Stirling Castle. Nice way to move the goalposts! And spotted and busted. We, Maggers, are on to your duplicity.

MagnumOpus
...King Author's version of Democracy...

Possibly the most retarded oxymoron I have ever seen; Monarchal Democracy. Comical.

reply to post by AugustusMasonicus


Such invention of terms are due to your poor understanding of the Arthur history, which was never Monarchical in origin.

The issue is King Arthur was not from the Roman side, but from the Celtic / Essene side-----which did not work or value Monarchy. Though some termed him a King----he was more along the lines of servant to the Peoples. Like some termed Jesus as King, the real story was the issue of the highest and most Pious Priesthood from Jesus. imho

The Round Table being an obvious Democratic concept of wide representation, and not that of Control by one Monarch or King, tells that Arthur was not a monarch or one behind the Roman Church.

The issues of the Grail are along the lines of who held the values of the high Priesthood of the Essene, which became the Celts. imho


The Roman Church was threatened by the issues of the Celtic Claims to the Priesthood via the Joseph route to ancestry, which was higher than the Roman claim by that from Peter and Paul.

When Arthur was killed----the legends of the Celtic Grail or Priesthood claims were taken over by the Roman Church of Britannia. imho

MagnumOpus
The issue is...

...that you think that democracy can operate in a monarchy.

You get funnier by the day.

AngryCymraeg
reply to post by MagnumOpus

 

Check your spelling. You mean King Arthur, not King Author. And once again - there is absolutely no proof of a Romano British king having a round table. Nothing. Nada. Nowt. NO PROOF. It's a load of medieval story-telling. I do however notice that you've admitted defeat in your claim that he was Scottish and are now referring to the region of Scotland near Stirling Castle. Nice way to move the goalposts! And spotted and busted. We, Maggers, are on to your duplicity.

The correction on the spelling is well noted.

However, the rest is pure bogus nonsense meant to mislead. imho

All the theme on Arthur was presented as his being part of the Celtic Religion, and that associated with the Essene followers from Joseph.

The Celtics were seen as a competitive claim for the Priesthood due to their direct links with Jesus Family and Joseph. Such illustrates that the Essene were not ones that valued Monarchy, yet the opposing side, the Romans valued Empire that was supported only via Paul and Peter claims to be connected with Jesus. imho

The Celtic claim was much greater and the Empires of Rome and England fought over that difference in the claims for the Priesthood.


Since the Essene were never organized behind a Monarchy, they called the followers of the Talmud (and Babylon's Nimrod) the Scarlet women. The Essene of Joseph left the region of Jerusalem to go to Cornwall, and the Holy Grail descendants of the Essene Priesthood lived there. The next most famous decedent was Arthur, who battled against Empire and Monarchy. imho


The Celtic religion moved to the North in later times, and the region is well known for its Celtic roots. Scotland was home for some of the migration of the Celtics, and when the truth be exposed---it was that difference in claims to the Priesthood by the Celtics that was the foundations of Scotland, which battled against Empire and Monarch for a long long time. imho


The central underlying issue, is the Empire of England doesn't want to be known for stamping out the Essene / Celtic religion to set up their Monarch Kings and Queens, and likewise the Masons don't want those associations to be highly made public.

Such information would tend to unseat the English Monarch and make them the anti-Christ, the anti-Essene, and the anti-Celtic religion that went totally against the Holy Grail's values. imho

MagnumOpus
reply to post by AugustusMasonicus

 

Such invention of terms are due to your poor understanding of the Arthur history, which was never Monarchical in origin.

The issue is King Arthur was not from the Roman side, but from the Celtic / Essene side-----which did not work or value Monarchy. Though some termed him a King----he was more along the lines of servant to the Peoples. Like some termed Jesus as King, the real story was the issue of the highest and most Pious Priesthood from Jesus. imho

The Round Table being an obvious Democratic concept of wide representation, and not that of Control by one Monarch or King, tells that Arthur was not a monarch or one behind the Roman Church.

The issues of the Grail are along the lines of who held the values of the high Priesthood of the Essene, which became the Celts. imho


The Roman Church was threatened by the issues of the Celtic Claims to the Priesthood via the Joseph route to ancestry, which was higher than the Roman claim by that from Peter and Paul.

When Arthur was killed----the legends of the Celtic Grail or Priesthood claims were taken over by the Roman Church of Britannia. imho

edit on 23-1-2014 by MagnumOpus because: Silly Mason retoric---seeks only to mislead the world and write false histories for the English Royals. imho

Total and utter round objects. Maggers, where the hell are you getting this drivel? King Arthur (by the way you finally seem to be proofreading your drivel, so congratulations! No more King Author!) was a Romano Briton. There is a difference. And there was no Essene presence here, so please, please, stop making an idiot of yourself. Arthur is linked to the Roman name Artorius. And if he existed - and it is more than likely that he is an amalgamation of different people - then he was a Dark Age general/king. So - not democratic.

MagnumOpus

The correction on the spelling is well noted.

However, the rest is pure bogus nonsense meant to mislead. imho

All the theme on Arthur was presented as his being part of the Celtic Religion, and that associated with the Essene followers from Joseph.

The Celtics were seen as a competitive claim for the Priesthood due to their direct links with Jesus Family and Joseph. Such illustrates that the Essene were not ones that valued Monarchy, yet the opposing side, the Romans valued Empire that was supported only via Paul and Peter claims to be connected with Jesus. imho

The Celtic claim was much greater and the Empires of Rome and England fought over that difference in the claims for the Priesthood.


Since the Essene were never organized behind a Monarchy, they called the followers of the Talmud (and Babylon's Nimrod) the Scarlet women. The Essene of Joseph left the region of Jerusalem to go to Cornwall, and the Holy Grail descendants of the Essene Priesthood lived there. The next most famous decedent was Arthur, who battled against Empire and Monarchy. imho


The Celtic religion moved to the North in later times, and the region is well known for its Celtic roots. Scotland was home for some of the migration of the Celtics, and when the truth be exposed---it was that difference in claims to the Priesthood by the Celtics that was the foundations of Scotland, which battled against Empire and Monarch for a long long time. imho


The central underlying issue, is the Empire of England doesn't want to be known for stamping out the Essene / Celtic religion to set up their Monarch Kings and Queens, and likewise the Masons don't want those associations to be highly made public.

Such information would tend to unseat the English Monarch and make them the anti-Christ, the anti-Essene, and the anti-Celtic religion that went totally against the Holy Grail's values. imho

edit on 23-1-2014 by MagnumOpus because: Exposing the Craft to cover up that the English Crown values sought to destroy the Celts and Essene's Holy Grail claims

I have facts behind me. History in fact. You have.... well, nothing. Drivel to be brutally honest.

reply to post by AngryCymraeg


Non-sense---that is the cover up story to attempt to suppress the Britannia types sought to stamp out the Essene, the Celtics, and then on to the Knights Templar that also valued that the Essenes of Jesus time knew Jesus had kids, relatives, and so forth.

The church of Rome has long been know to be threatened by the higher claim to the Priesthood. imho

reply to post by AngryCymraeg


The closest things to the facts is the research of Lawrence Gardner. Gardner gets really close to the truths on the Essene, their migration to the English Isles, and the family history from that point of origin.

All the Speculative masons have is speculation and nonsense, none of which are called facts. imho


One can essentially count on the Masons to tell any story in support of the Crown, and attempt to misinform on things that discredit the Crown. Such is contained in their Oaths to their other Masons in England, composed of lots of the English Royals that back and support the Crown.

They all tend to discredit any issues of Jesus Bloodline having more direct links to the Priesthood than that of Rome's Peter and Paul, who were more than willing to distort the Jesus story for the Roman claims of power via religion. imho


That is the only things everyone sees from the Mason's misleading conjectures to tell bigger lies for the Monarchy. imho

MagnumOpus
reply to post by AngryCymraeg

 

Non-sense---that is the cover up story to attempt to suppress the Britannia types sought to stamp out the Essene, the Celtics, and then on to the Knights Templar that also valued that the Essenes of Jesus time knew Jesus had kids, relatives, and so forth.

The church of Rome has long been know to be threatened by the higher claim to the Priesthood. imho

The Celtics? Whut? Eh? What on earth are you talking about Maggers?

MagnumOpus
reply to post by AngryCymraeg

 

The closest things to the facts is the research of Lawrence Gardner. Gardner gets really close to the truths on the Essene, their migration to the Enlish Isles, and the family history from that point of origin.

All the Speculative masons have is speculation and nonsense, none of which are called facts. imho

Speculation and nonsense eh? From this twit?

reply to post by AngryCymraeg



Meet a good bit of history:

If anyone looks real close they discover the Masons Reject the Light that they so desperately seek in their dark Temples. Plus, the appear to welcome ignorance, in place of light.

The Knights Templar had their all white robe with the Red Cross, as did others of the light. imho

The Essene also wore the Robe of White, as did Pythagoras at his schools in Greece.

Interesting correlations with Spartans and their friends the Celts. imho

Pythagoras was trained at the Mt. Carmel school of the Essenses.

Arimathea had possession of the Holy Relics as was searching for a strong hold to house them. King Avallach of Sarras became known as Mordreins meaning Slow of Belief, took Joseph and the Grail Keepers to his home named Peel Castle. Peel Castle was situated in the Land of Glass.

The Grail keepers were represented by a red cross. This began with Joseph of Arimathea. We find more evidence of the "Grail Keepers" nearly 400 years later. Lancelot, Sir Gawain and Perceval all bore the red cross on their shields.

The Keepers were a religious military order that was sworn to poverty and obedience to the Grail beliefs. They along with the Grail Kings wanted to regain the power that Benjamin once had in Israel. The plan was to place a man of the Holy Bloodline as the King of Judah. The Grail Kings were allowing the time needed to implement such a strategic plan, by beginning their own Christian teachings and beliefs.

Joseph of Arimathea had came against the most stubborn civilization to convert so he compromised with these people. These people were the Celts. They did not want to give up their belief of 'finding the
light.' Joseph used this to his advantage for Jesus the Christ was known as 'the light.' The Romans tried to force their church on the Celtic Christians, therefore leading to one of the most famous legends
of all time, King Arthur and Modred.

The Light of Essene and Celtics

reply to post by MagnumOpus


There is absolutely no proof that the Spartans had any links to the Votadini. Novantae or Dumnonii in Valentia. 0/10. Go back and try again.

MagnumOpus
reply to post by network dude

 

Anyone can listen to the entire speech and make up their own minds.

Yes, and I hope they click here to learn the truth. Because if they just take your word for anything, they will be heading down a dark path to the land of ignorance.

The point of the Essene being associated with the Spartans via Pythagoras is well supported in history, as is the Celts being associated with the Spartans. Thus, making it sustained that Joseph would partner with the Celts easily. Such became the link of Arthur looking for the Grail theme. And Thus the connections of the JFK theme linked to Camelot is sustained. imho

The root issue is the Celts/Spartains/Essene/Joseph had similar mystery school and religion background, which was far different than the Roman need for Empire and the like need of Britannia for Empire. The latter need for Empire being what the Scottish Rite Masons corruptions of the truth support in their need to kill JFK for going against the Southern Scottish Rite Masons, as well as the London Based Royalist Masons. imho

The former being the theme that the Founding Fathers of the US supported in their design of a Democratic system that abandoned the need for Kings and religion being intimated tied to Government. The US founding fathers appeared well informed of the Adam Weiskopf, of Bavarian Illuminati Fame, issues that the religion of Rome was a rigged deceit operation to support Throne and Empire, rather than Democracy.

Given the Masons can't tell the truth via their Oaths to the Royalists, all they relate is suspect of typical methods of religious deceit. imho It is interesting to take note that the Iberian zone provided the Vulgate that spoke to the issues of light via the term Lucifer, yet Jesus being the light of the Essene is missing from Royalists Mason games for Empire regeneration. imho


With that firmly in hand, by the example of the US Constitution going against Royalists and Church being Government.

It is time to drift back to more NASA and USAEC. imho