It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The populations of other large mammal species declined an average of 85 percent in West Africa between 1970 and 2005
Back in 2005, before the survey began, West African lions were believed to live in 21 different protected areas. But now a paper about the survey, published today in PLoS One, confirms that lions actually exist in just four of those sites..
The research team conducted in-person surveys in 13 of the 21 protected areas—each of which was larger than 500 square kilometers..
The researchers found the most West African lions in W-Arly-Pendjari, a complex of parks that crosses the borders of Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger, which they estimate to hold about 350 big cats. The three other sites in Senegal and Nigeria are each estimated to have fewer than 50 lions
Tthe IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group, which determines the conservation status of wild cats around the world, is also tackling the thorny issue of lion taxonomy, which may result in new classification for the West African lion. The IUCN currently lists the West African lion as a population, not a separate subspecies, and considers it to be endangered. “If West African lions were indeed classified as a separate subspecies by IUCN/SSC, we would recommend listing them as Critically Endangered,”
..declined an average of 85 percent in West Africa between 1970 and 2005, mostly to feed the voracious demand of the bushmeat trade. The 11 nations of West Africa are among the poorest on earth and include six of the world’s least developed countries. The countries in the region have no money for conservation, and the study found that most of the protected areas that were expected to contain lions had little to no enforcement, security patrols or management
starfoxxx
Did some of you read that article right? These are indigenous people of those nations killing them and eating BECAUSE THEY NEED FOOD..
It has nothing to do with some big man with a gun or a little penii, these people probably kill them with bows and other things, they do not need a gun to kill them.. I bet they can't afford a gun.
I am sad the lions are being wiped out but to blame the people there that have nothing to eat is silly.
It is not cruel, its survival..
reply to post by starfoxxx
The article focuses on the nations poor not being able to provide conservation, and killing the lions for food.
EsotericGod
reply to post by starfoxxx
The article focuses on the nations poor not being able to provide conservation, and killing the lions for food.
If they are intelligent enough to kill lions, surely they must be intelligent enough to find another means of survival. I dont think its a matter of killing them for their food. It would surely have somthing to do with survival in terms of protection.