Open letter to freemason

If you seriously think that i am going to let you abuse william then you are out of your tree. What do you expect when you come on the board and proceed to post abuse?

Do you want to be here?

Is this the way to act if you do?

Why the heck are you here if you don't?

BTW I didn't delete you post we have instituted a trashbin, a forum where the junk goes before it gets emptied. Your abuse is recorded in there.

NetChicken you know as well as I do that Abuse is insulting someone.

I've spoken so far only the TRUTH about William.

You know, you were there you stood up for me at first, keeping me around longer than anyone else wanted.

And while doing so I was U2Uing William about helping to keep Winston out of my posts, because Winston was simply typing the same thing OVER and OVER again.

It's like this in short:

Me: 2+2=4.

Winston: No its not it = 5.

Me: No it equals for see ..+..=....

Winston: No that's 5.

Me: You idiot *#@(@& Call it what you will 4//5 it still is the same number.

Winston: You're wrong.

Me: I am not and everyone else can see this!!! YOU #()#*#, come on guys tell him how he's wrong.

*Silence*

Winston: See no one agress with you it = 5 you're wrong.

Me: You damn bastard!

Now yeah I COULD have acted better, but damn that was a lot of work on my Babylonian numbers page and he just shruged it off with an invalid argument and no one seemed to care.

I asked William to help out and he never did.

He diserves to be exposed...not to be ruined, but he should at least address this Greivance.

My improper ban.

I brought it up earlier but I guess it was too early no one would hear me.

But now you have to face the fact that William caused more problems with me than he would let you realize.

If you don't believe me, just unban FreeMason for yourself and look at the U2Us I sent William.

There is the evidence that I went through the proper channels to remain calm, and William failed as an Administrator.

You could've held your cool. You sat there and insulted people till you were blue in the face, but most still held back from you.

(PS) Your math was still wrong. What? Nearly half a dozen people all got the same answer, different from your's. That mean's your right?

Those half a dozen had no CLUE what Babylonian math was...because they listened to you and Winston and didn't read the voluminous links I had posted.

Fools.

That whole debacle was a perfect example of how the vociferous idiots can change the opinions of the stupid masses.

Alot of them did goto a site and check too. The only one that couldn't figure the math out was you. We even SHOWED you where you went wrong. We explained it. Winston did a better job at explaining than anyone, but that's beside the point. lol

Actually if you want to really get into that argument...My math nor Winston's was wrong we were calculating different things.

The problem was no one was believing me because they were believing Winston when WINSTON was wrong because he was calculating for the wrong numbers.

It was all a definition error, I consantly told people to go back to my links and see how it was a definition error but no one would listen to the creator of the thread, no Winston had to be right.

He and you were wrong all the time.

Ugh I can prove I was right right now...

Babylonian math works on the principles of 60 there are no zeros.

so 666 has to = a number in babylonian. What is that number if you convert their sexidecimals to our decimals of 666?

That number is 11.6

How is it 11.6

Well you have a ones place, that's 6 Ones, because there are ones, and tens. And each place is a value of 60.

So You have the ones place, that means you have "6 ones" to get 6.

Then that means you have a remainder of 660.

Well how do you get 660 in babylonian?

11 in the tens place.

So by placing a 10+1 mark in the tens holder you have 11.

That makes a number like this.

XI IIIIII

That number is 11.6 which equals in the decimal system. 666!!!

I'M RIGHT, I WILL ALWAYS BE RIGHT!

We weren't wrong. I forgot what it was, but there was just one error you had that screwed you up. I went to the same site and tried doing it there way like you, and it came out wrong. Other site's, it all came out the other way.

No I'm right...look above.

This is why I say it was a "definition" error.

Because you two were calculating what 666 in BABYLONIAN would = in decimals.

Which meant 6 for the ones.
6 for the 10s or 3600.

And 6 for the 100s or 6*100

But don't you see that wasn't what I was saying?

I was saying you take 666, and convert it to SEXIDECIMALS!

I was always right.

This is what frustrated me you two wouldn't see that THAT was what I was saying.

Because Winston was really William who was purposely trying to piss me off.

And you bought into his idiocy.

This isn't the only post you've had trouble on Freemason, just look at your Metalstorm posts. How fast is the speed of light ?

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

here you guys didn't do it exactly as I previously said...it was this.

ones spot = 60^0.

Tens = 60^2

Hundreds = 60^10

You guys did

6*60^0 = 6
6*60^1 = 3600
6*60^2 = 21600
A grand total of 25206.

Don't you see how you were wrong?

It wasn't that the MATH was wrong...it was the definition

25206 is in DECIMALS.

I said 666 IN DECIMALS

To get that we have to do this.

6*60^0 = 6
11*60^1 = 660
Grand total of 666

Winston used you, you two were wrong all along. Wrong not in math, but definition of what we were FINDING.

11.6 = a year.

Year 116AD which was the year a VERY IMPORTANT BISHOP WAS KILLED IN THE CHURCH.

Which supported my Theory that 666 was the mark of ROME. A satire against rome written around that time.

You said that then too I think ... I also remember seeing someone (forget now) asking what made you think the bible writer's used a dead mathmatic's from a dead civilization ... or something to that effect.

Correction 6*60^1 = 360 not 3600...the grand total was 21966. Not what i previously gave.

No I remember that argument...but the argument is not valid.

At the time the Jews still had vast libraries, Josephus copied much of it down, and so the available information of the Babylonian Number system would not have been lost until after the burning of the Library of Alexandria.

I keep saying it I KNOW MY HISTORY lol....

The number system while maybe dead, can not be assumed as having been dead in the year 116AD.

But it is assumable to be little known hence why used.

Does it really matter? Great, you can calculate in base six, so what?

So nero was the anti-christ or whatever you were trying to prove. Its over its done, it does not matter anymore. It is literally ancient history, and debate it all you want, it is not going to change anything happening now, or ever again.

xAOS

See I told you I was not wrong.

I am not arguing with you that my "action" was justified.

But I should at least be given the dignity of being acredited as right when I AM right.

It was because I wasn't getting my justly entitled acceptance as being right that I got carried away.

Which I'll admit I can easily get carried away.

But I'm less aggressive towards people when it's their information, than when it is mine...if I'm wrong I admit it.

I remember being praised for having sought out the truth of something I said and correcting myself, it's not like I don't admit I'm wrong...I just wasn't wrong, and I never compromise my ideas.

That thing I was wrong about, was something stupid too if you want to know...it was water.

I said ice floats because Air gets into it while it freezes.

After that I searched it out, found out I was wrong, explained I was wrong and restated why ice floats...

If I were wrong about the babylonian number system I'd admit it I'm not a "thick head" like you guys called me way back then.

I do stand down, I just am not wrong.

Xaos, it matters because I'm impossible to insult practically, there's one way to insult me...and that's to convince everyone else I'm wrong when I am right.

I was right, I deserve to be given that recognition, and so be it.

If you were right about something, but everyone says you're wrong, what would you do...AGREE WITH THEM?

Galileo was right, Copernicus!

THEY WERE ALL TOLD THEY WERE WRONG.

I pray people never think like you Xaos.

That's why I had trouble handling myself, I couldn't help myself when I was being thought of as wrong when I was obviously right.

Wow, comparing yourself to Gallileo and Copernicus, quite the stretch.

First, you are on a completely different level from those two. Their ideas completely changed the idea of the universe and caused a scientific revolution. If true, your idea would make people say "Oh, thats intresting" and completely forget about it.

Second, you are going on the idea that because people do not believe you, you are right. If everyone said I was wrong, I would tend to believe them, especially if they back it up with evidence. I could be seeing a six foot bunny named harvey, but I am I wrong when I tell everone about it and they deny it? Guess who else was "TOLD THEY WERE WRONG": All of those doomsday cults, you, creationists, Lee at Gettysburg, need I go on?

XAOS

What no one posts here no when I'm right.

How about you all post "I'm sorry, you were right...we were all wrong, sorry for believing you to be wrong all these months."

Crap at least I know how to appologize when I was wrong.

Anyone have something they want me to publically appologize about. Go ahead and bring it up.

I don't doubt within these months I have wrongfully accused others of being wrong, blinded by anger that I had been wrongfully accused of being wrong.

So let's settle this now.

I'm right about that which I was called a person who couldn't admit he was wrong.

I can admit I'm wrong, but I will never admit I'm wrong when I'm right.

Only the weak admit they are witches when they are wrongfully accused of being such.

I have too much respect for myself to do that.

I, among most on this board, have a great deal to say to the "master".

In case you are wondering, this is DragonRider in disguise

However, in an attempt to let things die a quiet peaceful death, and at Williams request, I will refrain from what I would very much like to say.