Video from the 90s.Another Guy channeling another member of bashars civilisation

kauskau
reply to post by NavyDoc

 

He uses the brain of the medium as a translator for concepts he channels. but the concepts the medium DOES NOT HAVE TO KNOW..thats why he can talk about quantum physics and such while darryl has not much knowledge about that..
.he can use the "speech patterns " of the medium and of course he is not limited to the way the medium uses the language..thats why he can also create phonetic symbols which the medium does not know.
For example often when he talks about other civilisations "they" (his people) have met, he tries to translate their name into our "pattern"....and it can sound very funny .

What he can´t do is talking in a language the medium does not know and HE does not know...they always take the path of least resistance. Thats why of course he can talk through darryl in his own language "essessani"..cause : he knows it.
Btw:

example. Here he talks about one of my favourite civilisation ...which name sounds like "RFRKTHRM "

or about the "thook"

And this is the doublespeak that those who wish to deceive others used when their claims are held up to logical scrutiny.

NavyDoc

kauskau

The message is worthless unless the messenger is authenticated, thus is legitimacy is essential to the message.

what a stupid thing to say.

Of course not! When a message works it does not matter who brings it.

When a truth is mirrored it does not matter what reflects it. (the problem is: everyone waits for him to proof that he is ET. But if they would acutally listen to him..it would proof itself after some time of practicing..you seem to be in a devils circle thinking that it will proof itself as real unless you understand WHY it CANT DO THAT...and to understand that you must understand the content of his message...-> but a really self protecting mechanism you sceptics have

edit on 2-1-2014 by kauskau because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-1-2014 by kauskau because: (no reason given)

I disagree. If someone is lying about contacting alien entities, then their "message" from alien entities would be false, and thus not worth consideration. You really have left logic on the side of the road, haven't you?

I have 2 friends who say that they dont believe he is an alien. They actually believe he is a kind of "savant" who plays an alienrole ....but they dont care: they say the information that he gives is brilliant and helped them to redefine their whole concept of life.
So : no ...my logic is fine.

kauskau

NavyDoc

kauskau

The message is worthless unless the messenger is authenticated, thus is legitimacy is essential to the message.

what a stupid thing to say.

Of course not! When a message works it does not matter who brings it.

When a truth is mirrored it does not matter what reflects it. (the problem is: everyone waits for him to proof that he is ET. But if they would acutally listen to him..it would proof itself after some time of practicing..you seem to be in a devils circle thinking that it will proof itself as real unless you understand WHY it CANT DO THAT...and to understand that you must understand the content of his message...-> but a really self protecting mechanism you sceptics have

edit on 2-1-2014 by kauskau because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-1-2014 by kauskau because: (no reason given)

I disagree. If someone is lying about contacting alien entities, then their "message" from alien entities would be false, and thus not worth consideration. You really have left logic on the side of the road, haven't you?

I have 2 friends who say that they dont believe he is an alien. They actually believe he is a kind of "savant" who plays an alienrole ....but they dont care: they say the information that he gives is brilliant and helped them to redefine their whole concept of life.
So : no ...my logic is fine.

So basically this guy says a good line that makes you feel better about yourself. Kind of like Jim Jones in the early years.

Here's a newsflash--this is what hucksters do: feed a lien of nice sounding bull# to make weak-minded, depressed, and gullible people feel better about themselves. This is the hallmark of every cult leader in history. Although one may not be able to call him a cult leader, he uses the exact same sort of techniques.

reply to post by kauskau


it means that the stated explaination of this persons alledged chaneling contradicts your explaination of basha

reply to post by kauskau


you tell me to " focus on the message " - what message is that - all we get are generic pop psychology platitudes .

there is no message that contains any uniqie or special information

and to show this - cite one basha " message " that could not have come from a terrestrial source

ignorant_ape
reply to post by kauskau

 

it means that the stated explaination of this persons alledged chaneling contradicts your explaination of basha

The moderator tries to explain channeling to an audience not familiar with it.
its not bashar or alan explaining what channeling is.

reply to post by ignorant_ape



as i said: there will not be direct proof in a thing that would convince a sceptic like you..

Its not a sentence that he says that no human could do..its the system itself that explains why "believing is seeing"..

the way he does that..no human can do.

But as i said: you are the proof for his system. You dont want to believe it so reality will reflect that.

So have fun with that..

reply to post by kauskau


Quick--in a single paragraph summarize his life-changing wisdom and the message.

reply to post by NavyDoc

If someone is lying about contacting alien entities, then their "message" from alien entities would be false, and thus not worth consideration.

You must hate Science fiction right ? I accept that some of the importance regarding the communication would be lost but from there to declare it not worth of consideration is a large jump. I love human creativity and even more human fantasy (well I don't like most abstract paintings but I decide to declare that a limitation of mine, I have no problem in people loving to create and looking at it even if I can't empathise).

The message itself in this case as far as I have heard it is just sensible common sense and psychological and philosophical introspection, there does not seem to be any real objectionable content and only one or two fuzzy conclusions. Overall I guess people that have no time to think on the subjects he is speaking about would gain from listening to it (the problem is that those same people would probably fall into two sections gullible to the complete package or as you dismissive to it all).

UFO "channelling" is part of the reason why this subject has become a joke among most serious scientists since the late 70s/80s.

reply to post by kauskau


I see you did a lot of editing there...

Believing is seeing.

Billions believe in God...none See him literally.

I think you got that backwards...wasn't it something like...seeing is believing. But we'll let that slide...since you do much better in german.

edit: btw. I do meditation. Still...not being contacted.

MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by kauskau

 

I see you did a lot of editing there...

Believing is seeing.

Billions believe in God...none See him literally.

I think you got that backwards...wasn't it something like...seeing is believing. But we'll let that slide...since you do much better in german.

I believe it's "Hear me now und belief me later" in German.

reply to post by kauskau


Just for a moment, I could have sworn it was a Jim Carrey impression of Bashar.

I hope anyone else channeling Essassani realize they are infringing on Darryl Anka's Trademark of the named race....LOL

Essassani Trademark

Yeah...they are all totally legit...by the way I am going to trademark the term Human and make a killing on it.

And I wonder how Bashar would feel knowing Anka trademarked his name as well....poor Bashar...not even here yet and has already lost the rights to his own name and race of people.....

Trademarks

What would be REALLY funny is if someone else trademarked Darryl Anka's name....talk about a twist.

reply to post by NavyDoc


summarize buddha ...

reply to post by Vasa Croe


I dont like the way darryl makes his business.

But darryl is not bashar.

Whatever. This thread is about alen from essessani.

I like his style. It reminds me totally of bashar.

And still: who could copy both of them?

reply to post by spodokomodo


lol..jes. First i was also not sure if this is a joke..

reply to post by Vasa Croe


I never knew they trademarked the names.....makes me laugh! That means I cannot name my child Bashar? And I was so hoping for a chance. Not what I would have liked to see of Daryl Anka's business of channeling (but he's only human).

maggi
reply to post by Vasa Croe

 

I never knew they trademarked the names.....makes me laugh! That means I cannot name my child Bashar? And I was so hoping for a chance. Not what I would have liked to see of Daryl Anka's business of channeling (but he's only human).

yes. The price policy in my eyes is also a shame.

I dont know why they make it so expensive. I understand that he is not channeling that much per year but in my eyes when it would be cheaper more people would buy the new dvds.

I think there is an agreement between bashar and darryl that a certain amount of information must be freely available.
But for me the most interesting thing right now is listen to "willa"..the parallel dimension contact specialist. And she is only in the new talks.

lol

bashar about "illegal downloading"