Emails Reveal Deceased Hedge Fund Manager Refused To Join Bill Gates’ "Worthless" Giving Pledge

I have said before that Bill Gates is a greedy psychopath.
He has gone all in on Geo-Engineering and hedged his weather manipulation efforts with Monsanto weather resistant seeds to capitalize on the emerging (manipulatable) technology.
He is sterilizing the people's of Africa in exchange for the medicines, food or seeds they need to survive.
There are reports of forced vaccinations at gunpoint to further the depopulation agenda.
His software has been fully compromised by the NSA and he makes billions off of selling operating systems that allow the NSA even greater access to the private information and enhance the draconian agencies facist data collection practices.
He even has a formula for determining how many people should be allowed to live on his Earth.
Apparently sweeping away the "useless eaters" has become his life's mission but good ol' Bill didn't stop there.
He wants to keep all the money "in the family" and not have it be given away as hedge manager Robert Wilson who was reported to have committed suicide.
Gate's "Giving Pledge" is a way for the ultra-rich to keep their money tied up in tax free trusts and foundations but Wilson was dead against it and called it out as the self-serving mistake it always was.
I am not saying Gate's had Wilson killed...even if it's well within his capabilities.
But one must ask themselves:

"What really happened and what's really going on here?"

One of the ultra-rich breaks ranks and suddenly decides to off himself after unequivocably refusing to allow his vast wealth to become tied up in the system after his death?
I don't know about anyone else but Gates, his companies and his foundations have enough of a track record in unethical (borderline sociopathic) behavior that red flags should already be on the field long before news of Wilson's demise hit the headlines.
I haven't any concrete proof yet but something is definitely amiss.
As always, you should decide for yourselves...

www.buzzfeed.com...

-Happy New Year-

I don't blame Gates for wanting to keep his money in his family after death. Do you think you should get a share?

reply to post by Eryiedes


the top notch supreme level hitmen only charge between 50-100k for a clean hit.

Up to 1 million (max) for a public job of a high profile target.

When you consider this, there is NO way to ever know. Was some underling of Gates "showing initiative"?

Possibly. When people will kill someone over a pair of sneakers, then without a doubt these piles of !#$!$ like Gates Daddy the Euenics grand old man. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Why do people respect Bill Gates anyway? Didn't he steal the ideas from a college roommate and use his RICH BOY connects to "make it all happen"?

reply to post by Eryiedes


Good morning Eryiedes, Happy New Year.

I have said before that Bill Gates is a greedy psychopath.

We'll have to disagree on that. My personal experience is that he is not a greed driven personality or a psychopath. Neither is his wife who quite frankly was quite helpful to him. Now if you were talking about Steve Balmer then I'd probably agree with you.

First thing I checked on the pledge site was what happens to all the money.

The pledge does not solicit support for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation or any other specific cause or organization. The pledge encourages signatories to find their own unique ways to give that inspire them personally and benefit society.

Each person who pledges makes an individual decision about which particular causes or organizations they wish to support.

The pledge asks for a commitment of a majority of their wealth. Many have and will continue to exceed it Pledge site

Looks like they're just asking that people give their money away. Yeah Gates is giving his to his own foundation but many of the others are giving to lots of different causes. I see nothing sinister here.

As for the guy who killed himself, who knows. I think there was some news articles on it but I'm not looking for them. Still recovering from last night.

HanzHenry
reply to post by Eryiedes

 

the top notch supreme level hitmen only charge between 50-100k for a clean hit.

Up to 1 million (max) for a public job of a high profile target.

When you consider this, there is NO way to ever know. Was some underling of Gates "showing initiative"?

Possibly. When people will kill someone over a pair of sneakers, then without a doubt these piles of !#$!$ like Gates Daddy the Euenics grand old man. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Why do people respect Bill Gates anyway? Didn't he steal the ideas from a college roommate and use his RICH BOY connects to "make it all happen"?

Allegedly he borrowed the money from his father to buy the original OS from two guys I think were in Berkeley. It was a sure deal, he had the OS pre-sold. Or call it flipped to IBM. Gates license to IBM however was non-exclusive so he copped 2 million on daddy's borrowed 150k and then continued to produce media in direct competition with IBMDOS.

Cheers - Dave

reply to post by Bassago


Since it's common knowledge that foundations and charities are how the elite avoid paying taxes to dispence whatever funding they recieve I find it difficult to believe that the elites have any kind of program which is genuinely oriented to helping the poor.
They and they alone decide how funds are distributed and they are almost exclusively dispensed to the benefit of those on top and not those on the bottom.
If you want to believe that Gates is an actual philanthropist I will not stop you but gunpoint vaccinations and forced sterilizations are enough to make me question his motivations regardless of how he presents himself to the press which they (coinsedently) control.
On this we disagree.
My only point is that we are not being told the full story on this as the free press has claimed they have a right to do yet demonstrated they do not.
I do not believe the claims that Geo-Engineering is for man's benefit when the only actual proof presented hints to the opposite by shills like David Keith when they screw up.
Whatever Bill is planning is only to benefit a few and his legacy will not be one of tolerance or acceptance...it will be based solely on control and monopoly.
We already have an established pattern for Bill based on his past behavior alone and the actions of his foundations.
Using these foundations to discredit and destroy people of opposing points of view, Bill is able to maintain control using his wealth and influence regardless of whether there is a valid critisism or not. If it's a threat to what he wants (for right or wrong) then his "charities use their wealth to undermine the positions of anyone who opposes what the Gate's Foundation wants.
We simply see this situation differently.

-Peace-

(Oh...and Happy New Year to you too!)

bobs_uruncle
Allegedly he borrowed the money from his father to buy the original OS from two guys I think were in Berkeley. It was a sure deal, he had the OS pre-sold. Or call it flipped to IBM. Gates license to IBM however was non-exclusive so he copped 2 million on daddy's borrowed 150k and then continued to produce media in direct competition with IBMDOS.

Allegedly, indeed. Microsoft bought Seattle DOS (also called QDOS for "Quick and Dirty Operating System") for a total of $75K ($25K initially, then another $50K) from Tim Paterson and Rod Brock, owner of SCP (Seattle Computer Products). The deal was brokered by Paul Allen. It's worth noting that QDOS was a knock off of CP/M, an 8-bit OS. many of the commands were exactly the same. Gary Kildall was "working on" CP/M-86 for 16 bit operating systems, but was late, which prompted Brock and Paterson to design their own "quick and dirty" OS so they could have one to sell with their own computer. A competent attorney back in 1980 could have sued SCP for infringement of CP/M. Whether Microsoft got the money from Gate's Dad I don't know, but this the first I've heard about that. Microsoft was already doing very well and hardly needed such a small infusion of cash. The story sounds improbable to me.

Microsoft bought QDOS as a non-exclusive license allowing SCP the right to sell the operating system along with a CPU, meaning hardware meaning a computer. However, SCP interpreted this to mean "hardware = a single CPU" so they sold Seattle-DOS in a box with a single CPU chip legally, circumventing the agreement on a technicality. Ironically, this same tactic has been used to sell individual copies of Windows. I have a copy of XP that came with a piece of hardware for a computer I built myself, not even a CPU but a connecting wire, that fulfilled the requirement to ship Windows "with hardware."

This is almost the same deal that Microsoft brokered with IBM, allowing Microsoft to sell "IBM-DOS" separately as "MS-DOS," one of the best deals in business history, but hardly unique. The fact is Microsoft bought QDOS legally. If they did get the money from Gates' Dad, that isn't illegal, and it certainly was not an amazing amount of money. If you insist that Microsoft "ripped off" SCP, then SCP "ripped off" CP/M, clearly. But, then, Steve Wozniak "ripped off" HP, Steve Jobs "ripped off" Xerox, and Samsung "ripped off" Apple. It's a long chain that the courts have already gone over.

reply to post by Eryiedes


The Bill Gates charity story is an interesting one. I believe it started with the U2 guy who, himself, reported to Rumsfeld at the time. Gates, however, is I think the smartest of the group and the most secretly vengeful toward the entity that tried to take away his money - the U.S. And, subsequently, other governments and entities.

Read the stories on the guy who allegedly committed suicide. Would be interesting if, in light of recent ill health, he was in the process of making some changes to his will. It is unusual that a person of such far-reaching economy, as he is reported to have been, would choose such a sort of splattering all over the place way of offing himself.

reply to post by Eryiedes


can you identify some operating systems which are not infected with NSA malware?

eg how about Linux?

reply to post by Eryiedes


Bill Gates started off his career as a Dodgy Hustler business man. That's his stripes and no amount if image shaping through PR can change him. What im saying is hes only following his instincts which is use people to advance his own agenda. The only thing I cant understand is why he doesn't retire and enjoy his wealth.

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Eryiedes

 

can you identify some operating systems which are not infected with NSA malware?

NSA malware is one thing.
Gates having a backdoor built into Win8's "trusted computing" for their use is another.

-Peace-

schuyler

bobs_uruncle
Allegedly he borrowed the money from his father to buy the original OS from two guys I think were in Berkeley. It was a sure deal, he had the OS pre-sold. Or call it flipped to IBM. Gates license to IBM however was non-exclusive so he copped 2 million on daddy's borrowed 150k and then continued to produce media in direct competition with IBMDOS.

Allegedly, indeed. Microsoft bought Seattle DOS (also called QDOS for "Quick and Dirty Operating System") for a total of $75K ($25K initially, then another $50K) from Tim Paterson and Rod Brock, owner of SCP (Seattle Computer Products). The deal was brokered by Paul Allen. It's worth noting that QDOS was a knock off of CP/M, an 8-bit OS. many of the commands were exactly the same. Gary Kildall was "working on" CP/M-86 for 16 bit operating systems, but was late, which prompted Brock and Paterson to design their own "quick and dirty" OS so they could have one to sell with their own computer. A competent attorney back in 1980 could have sued SCP for infringement of CP/M. Whether Microsoft got the money from Gate's Dad I don't know, but this the first I've heard about that. Microsoft was already doing very well and hardly needed such a small infusion of cash. The story sounds improbable to me.

Microsoft bought QDOS as a non-exclusive license allowing SCP the right to sell the operating system along with a CPU, meaning hardware meaning a computer. However, SCP interpreted this to mean "hardware = a single CPU" so they sold Seattle-DOS in a box with a single CPU chip legally, circumventing the agreement on a technicality. Ironically, this same tactic has been used to sell individual copies of Windows. I have a copy of XP that came with a piece of hardware for a computer I built myself, not even a CPU but a connecting wire, that fulfilled the requirement to ship Windows "with hardware."

This is almost the same deal that Microsoft brokered with IBM, allowing Microsoft to sell "IBM-DOS" separately as "MS-DOS," one of the best deals in business history, but hardly unique. The fact is Microsoft bought QDOS legally. If they did get the money from Gates' Dad, that isn't illegal, and it certainly was not an amazing amount of money. If you insist that Microsoft "ripped off" SCP, then SCP "ripped off" CP/M, clearly. But, then, Steve Wozniak "ripped off" HP, Steve Jobs "ripped off" Xerox, and Samsung "ripped off" Apple. It's a long chain that the courts have already gone over.

I don't believe I said he did anything illegal. Lots of flips and brokered deals get sold all around the world every day. I guess my point was that Gates did nothing other than buy a product and then sell it for a higher price through a pre-existing deal to the benefit of IBM and himself. Nothing illegal there, however, when they say in commercials (as they used to quite often) that the software Bill Gates wrote runs on millions of computers, that would seem patently to be a lie, since he didn't write it. In actual fact, I would be surprised if Gates has written anything of substance other than possibly a cheque (and even that is simply an IOU or debt instrument) ;-)

It sort of reminds me of my former managing director's son, he hired 7 guys over a period of two years to write an OS to manage a data acquisition storage system. He (the son) claimed the software was his and that he defacto wrote it, which was a complete lie as his father (the managing director) had paid to have it written by 7 software engineers. In the end it didn't work and as incoming Chief of R&D I was tasked to fix their mess and his stupidity (which took me about a month). So I see parallels in these kinds of situations...

Cheers - Dave

AthlonSavage
reply to post by Eryiedes

 

can you identify some operating systems which are not infected with NSA malware?

eg how about Linux?

How about linux? Yes, linux is potentially much safer than windows/iproducts -
BUT there are so many third party software products in use, one hardly need to exploit operating system vulnerabilities.
The first browser, add-on, extension, java script maintenance - anything you load or allow to be loaded on your system potentially contains malicious code, even if it's "open source". "Compatibility" updates required by browsers, viewers, players, etc. aren't delivered in source code at all, leaving your system wide open to "trusted" software suppliers.

In general, I feel "less intruded" with linux rather than MS/Apple - unsure if Adroid compromised as well.
At the level of the NSA, if your systems are targeted it makes no difference what OS you run if you' have any network connection.

ganjoa


s