It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
funbox
both right and left, hence the two different fixed patterns , erm why your here ArMaP , you got a good link to a science site that describes in depth the water/atmosphere scenario on mars?
symptomoftheuniverse
Here you are armap www.universetoday.com...
funbox
briny wet behind the ears , occums razor would suggest that the darkening would be caused by saturation therby lowering the light index reflectivity/absorbtion of the surface, sheesh
symptomoftheuniverse
Its millions of lemmings,or wildebeast perhaps one of those flows appears to have a substantial shadow, whatever it is ,its absolutly gushing
salty water turning to ice then slowly sublimating perhaps. Whats the time frame for those gifs? It almost looks like a mars quake dislodged a lot of sand but that would only take seconds.. Thats why it must be water freezing like stalagmites or tites,the slowly evaporating. The residue left behind? Mars ultra thin dust perhaps?Maybe the permafrost is not that deep? Pure speccy ofcourse
ArMaP
symptomoftheuniverse
Its millions of lemmings,or wildebeast perhaps one of those flows appears to have a substantial shadow, whatever it is ,its absolutly gushing
One thing I noticed some years ago about some of those flows is that the marks they leave are not flat, they appear higher than the rest of the slope, another reason why some scientists think it's sand.
Whatever it is, it doesn't come from the top layer of the soil, it comes from some metres beneath the surface. Unfortunately I don't think that those layers photographed by Curiosity are deep enough to be as old as those that, apparently, produce those flows, we could kill two birds with one stone if they were and if they get that area analysed carefully.
ArMaP
symptomoftheuniverse
Its millions of lemmings,or wildebeast perhaps one of those flows appears to have a substantial shadow, whatever it is ,its absolutly gushing
One thing I noticed some years ago about some of those flows is that the marks they leave are not flat, they appear higher than the rest of the slope, another reason why some scientists think it's sand.
Whatever it is, it doesn't come from the top layer of the soil, it comes from some metres beneath the surface. Unfortunately I don't think that those layers photographed by Curiosity are deep enough to be as old as those that, apparently, produce those flows, we could kill two birds with one stone if they were and if they get that area analysed carefully.
leylandthinker
reply to post by jeep3r
Great thread i follow all news on these "rocks" that the rover has come across. Mars is a interesting planet i think we will find more things that will make for great discussion.
i diddnt notice them ones lol my sticks are where you placed your zooms. Bang center, sticking out sideways. They are only tiny wee things. mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
funbox
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
looks like it , maybe they are heavily minerally 'bound' with water and are sort of growing ? nice spot
sol529
funBoxedit on 6-2-2014 by funbox because: linx