It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nations, like nature, abhor a vacuum. It must be filled. How it is filled, by whom and with what are the challenging questions. Unlike nature, which seeks to fill a vacuum with whatever is handy and can be stuffed or sucked into the space available, nations rely on power, relationships and institutions to fill vacuums that arise in the international system. Political vacuums can readily be filled by raw power and the domination of the strong over the weak. Or they can be filled by the rule of law and a community of nations.
Twice in the last 60-plus years the United States chose to fill the vacuum caused by the collapse of old institutions, relationships, and power centers. After World War II, along with key allies, the U.S. created an entirely new international order with a set of democratic institutions and international agreements that have endured to this day. America, again in concert with many allies, also built a security apparatus and military machine of global reach and power unlike any seen in peacetime. When the Soviet Union collapsed, the United States did not simply declare victory and go home. Rather, even while reducing the size of its military, America chose to remain in the world, forward deployed, and committed to maintaining and even expanding long-established alliances and security relationships. As a result, the world was able to weather difficult and dangerous transitions and create or maintain a viable international system. In both cases, nations, including America's former adversaries, had the opportunity to become part of that system and to flourish.
U.S.A! USA!
The U.S.A has unparalleled military power.
This is a compilation of some of America's powerful weapons, like the F22 Raptor and M1 Abrams tank, I also featured the USS freedom.
God bless the United States of America and its Allies -67claudius3
Mon1k3r
This is all assuming that the US government really tells it's military what to do.
I move from the supposition that the US government does what it is told to do with it's forces.
The Navy makes vastly more money selling services, utilities, protection? around the world than it gets from tax dollars. It funds its own research, contracts the manufacture of its own weapons and ammunition, and it serves to safeguard the natural resource/political interest for those who own it. Not necessarily America.
America's Military Power 'Holds The World Together'
beezzer
America's Military Power 'Holds The World Together'
Like a hug. America just wants to give a world a cuddly bear hug. And a smooch on the check!
Rosinitiate
Might I suggest instead Duct tape?edit on 28-12-2013 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)
crazyewok
It probably does. Like the UK did duering the 1800's
The problem is the USA like the UK did is getting too arrogant and too big for its boots.
It needs to scale things back. Not give up being a super power but try and scale the warmongering and spying back and start working on the things it was known and loved for again like science and tecnology.edit on 28-12-2013 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)
beezzer
In another thread I was recently chastised because I dared to suggest that we (America) apologise to the Queen and take us back as a colony.
crazyewok
beezzer
In another thread I was recently chastised because I dared to suggest that we (America) apologise to the Queen and take us back as a colony.
Hey you had your chance like Canada but you blew it in 1776
Mon1k3r
This is all assuming that the US government really tells it's military what to do.
I move from the supposition that the US government does what it is told to do with it's forces.
The Navy makes vastly more money selling services, utilities, protection? around the world than it gets from tax dollars. It funds its own research, contracts the manufacture of its own weapons and ammunition, and it serves to safeguard the natural resource/political interest for those who own it. Not necessarily America.
Assad refused to sign a proposed agreement with Qatar that would run a pipeline from the latter's North field, contiguous with Iran's South Pars field, through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and on to Turkey, with a view to supply European markets - albeit crucially bypassing Russia. Assad's rationale was "to protect the interests of [his] Russian ally, which is Europe's top supplier of natural gas." Instead, the following year,
Assad pursued negotiations for an alternative $10 billion pipeline plan with Iran, across Iraq to Syria, that would also potentially allow Iran to supply gas to Europe from its South Pars field shared with Qatar. The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for the project was signed in July 2012 - just as Syria's civil war was spreading to Damascus and Aleppo - and earlier this year Iraq signed a framework agreement for construction of the gas pipelines.