The most convincing UFO video footage we have.

reply to post by Ectoplasm8


Here's the best full reporting on the Japanese Airlines incident that i've been able to find, for those who are interested.

brumac.8k.com...

reply to post by Kangaruex4Ewe


Have to agree just has to be some thing more everyone feels it jus hope I'm around to see it

U can just feel there's something more out there these hoax videos keep the hope inside alight and at the same time make u question the length some ppl will go to to try to fool u only if there time was used to acutely try and communicate with any other "beings" we might have already seen what we have felt, believed all along there has to more there jus has to !!!

To me, the lights look composited onto the video.

However, the close-up shot looks convincing with all the thermal distortion.

Thanks for giving me a full blown panic attack with your op video.

reply to post by unb3k44n7

Check this one out.


Then read this:
www.denverpost.com...


Then go back to look at the OP.

reply to post by Phage


Obvious hoaxes are obvious. If you hadn't posted an admission to the hoax, someone would've believed it was a real alien craft.

Bottom Line...

There is NO definitive proof (on video or otherwise) of non-terrestrial craft. Period.

While many of us (me included) may have seen things we can't document using a physical medium which we can't explain, there currently exists no concrete proof that is able to be presented in a visual manner.

reply to post by Phage


...Phage, that's not even similar to the OP video except for the portrayal of a circular shape, which doesn't resemble the characteristics of the op video's circular formation.

reply to post by unb3k44n7

And except that it's a reflection on a window

TXRabbit
Bottom Line...

There is NO definitive proof (on video or otherwise) of non-terrestrial craft. Period.

While many of us (me included) may have seen things we can't document using a physical medium which we can't explain, there currently exists no concrete proof that is able to be presented in a visual manner.

Well if there is no video after decades and now every one carries video cameras on there phone id have to say that proves we're not being visited by aliens. You have billions of people on the planet and we have zero evidence in science that would be enough to prove an experiment wrong and have you start over.Now i know there is life out there the question becomes are these distances just to great. And maybe only oneor two civilizations in an entire galaxy eer figure out how to travel faster than light. And still no gurantee there anywhere near us.

reply to post by roncoallstar


Good morning OP and thanks for the post.

My personal favorite is this news report and actual footage from Mexican military cameras observing a number of lights moving across the horizon. There is no doubt or concerns over fakes here. This is all the footage you really need sir.....Mexican Government Admits Aliens are Real

reply to post by Phage


You can read my gray area account if you 'd like to understand why I commented the way I did on what was portrayed in the op video. The video you posted is not like the op video.

reply to post by unb3k44n7


I'm not sure and can't fully tell, but it seems that you're claiming the video in the OP is a real object? It is a confessed and confirmed hoax. Check this post out here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Arbitrageur


Fair enough, i can see what you mean, but what about the radar returns, didn't they show something following the JAL plane? Also by the time that other United Plane flew by they were no longer reporting seeing it.

It's just hard to fathom how a large cloud and a runway could be so mistaken for the UFO reported.

You've raised perhaps a reasonable doubt though i'll give you that.

Still uncertain..


Also, in this vast universe, why is it so utterly unbelievable the idea that some, i repeat some UFO sightings might be of extraterrestrial origin?

I don't see what that would be so impossible to fathom, especially now that modern science has not been able to rule out the possibility of a type of warp drive.

To a photon of light, there is no space between the stars, and it's been shown that non-locality is real and that space and time are not the most fundamental aspects of reality, the implication being that they could be transcended.


There's also the Fermi Paradox to consider, whereby expansion could simply involve visitation and travel to gain knowledge and not necessarily colonization.

Based on this, are the sceptics saying in effect, referring to the Fermi Paradox, that there are no stage three super-advanced technological civilizations in the universe, as evidenced by the fact that we have NOT been visited or that there is no evidence to support such a contention, and/or that instantaneous, interstellar travel is absolutely impossible based on Relativistic physics which makes the speed of light the absolute limitation in terms of interstellar travel?

If so, how can you be so sure of yourself, that such a thing is impossible, even using the Earth itself and our own recent technological advance as an analogue.

Then again, extraordinary claims do require extraordinary evidence, i'll give you that much, but it's certainly not outside the realm of conceivable, if we are not alone in the universe that is which is rather hard to fathom, that we would be. Seems like a strange thing for the sceptics to be arguing, which amounts to a conclusion either that there are no such advanced civilizations in the universe, or that if there are that they cannot possibly by any means whatsoever get to here, from there.

Why would they want to? Because of the exceedingly rare occurrence of such worlds, perhaps..? Also putting ourselves in their shoes, isn't it the ultimate question and curiosity? Seems a logical extension of the desire to explore and discover, if you have the technological capability to do so.

Best Regards,

NAM

reply to post by _BoneZ_


I didn't give my opinion whether I thought the video was fake or not. The comment wasn't based on the legitimacy of the video.

So it's a hoax, that's ok, but knowing that or not knowing that, before, now, or after - my initial comment is still legit; legit, but doesn't matter.

Phage, Bonez, Arbi , Armap, Jim and Karl.

You all ruined my weekend.

C an't you allow a girl her hysteronics over UFOs?

reply to post by zazzafrazz


Hi, Zazzzyyyy. I sowwy. Here's some fruit cheescake to make up for it:

Murgatroid

I haven't seen a single shred of evidence that suggests UFOs exist.

that is absurd.

of course UFOs exist.....

all a UFO is, is something in the sky, you cannot readily identify...whether its a plane, bird, bug, or flare...until it's positively identified, it's a UFO.

UFO does not automatically mean "extraterrestrial spacecraft"