Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Phage
reply to post by Lazarus Short

 

Flatter?
25.media.tumblr.com...

I meant in the topographical sense.

reply to post by Lazarus Short

Ah. In that case, smoother would be a better word perhaps.

Why would the Earth become larger and rougher at the same time. It would seem that if a surface is stretched it would loose relief, not gain it.

Phage
reply to post by Lazarus Short

 

Ah. In that case, smoother would be a better word perhaps.

Why would the Earth become larger and rougher at the same time. It would seem that if a surface is stretched it would loose relief, not gain it.

A better word, and a fair question. I just cannot argue with this: www.youtube.com...

Given that, I suppose (a perilous thing to do, I know) that some folding and uplifting went on, accounting for the mountain ranges that still look rather "raw." I picture some Asians on the shore, seeing the sub-continent appearing on the horizon, and yelling, "It's India! Run for your lives!"

reply to post by Lazarus Short

I just cannot argue with this:

I can.

Great reading the posts, I like that....the source:
The Scripture said the water came out of the ground mainly, the rain as an afterthought.

GBP/JPY
I'm surprised to see so many nay- sayers here, with no remark about the shape in the picture.
I'm a trained observer....pilot, field engineer, outdoorsman, in my 60's....so, I say a child could look at that and tell you it's a boat.

edit on 21-12-2013 by GBP/JPY because: Yahuweh...the coolest of names, I swear

You obviously didnt see my post, just a few before yours.

I dont dispute that this looks like a ship. The problem is that the real Noah's Ark didn't resemble a modern day ship. If anything it looked more like a submarine, and its all in the Talmud.

Lazarus Short

Phage
reply to post by Lazarus Short

 

Ah. In that case, smoother would be a better word perhaps.

Why would the Earth become larger and rougher at the same time. It would seem that if a surface is stretched it would loose relief, not gain it.

A better word, and a fair question. I just cannot argue with this: www.youtube.com...

Given that, I suppose (a perilous thing to do, I know) that some folding and uplifting went on, accounting for the mountain ranges that still look rather "raw." I picture some Asians on the shore, seeing the sub-continent appearing on the horizon, and yelling, "It's India! Run for your lives!"

Now why would anyone want to argue with that? I always go to comic book artists to get my science info.

reply to post by peter vlar

Douglas Adams? Comic books? Hardly.
Oh. Wait. Neal. Nevermind.

reply to post by Phage


I loved his revisionist take on the early X-men and Avengers. His revision of plate tectonics not so much.

reply to post by Lazarus Short

A better word, and a fair question. I just cannot argue with this: www.youtube.com...

I can argue with that, but at the moment I'm more inclined to giggle.