It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Citing unnamed sources at the Department of Justice, the Times reports officials have that if they were to prosecute Assange, they would have to also prosecute U.S news organizations and journalists as well, calling their conundrum a “New York Times problem.” The Times published reports on many of the documents Assange provided.
Read more: Julian Assange's plan to avoid US prosecution may have worked | TIME.com swampland.time.com...
I think this is just a ploy to get him to ease up and face charges for the sexual assault (or whatever it was) and hope it's the end of it, but the US Eagle will swoop in for him.
amazing
good news. How can you want to punish a guy that's just telling the truth? Shouldn't all government documents be public unless it's operationally unsound...like a military strategy and location of cia operatives in foreign countries? That's about it. Just about everything that Assange, Manning, and Snowden, to name just three, that they 'leaked" is stuff we should have known anyway...more embarrassing then anything else. Assange is a hero, and anyone who thinks differently is someone that has something to hide or doesn't love freedom. Period.
CALGARIAN
Citing unnamed sources at the Department of Justice, the Times reports officials have that if they were to prosecute Assange, they would have to also prosecute U.S news organizations and journalists as well, calling their conundrum a “New York Times problem.” The Times published reports on many of the documents Assange provided.
Read more: Julian Assange's plan to avoid US prosecution may have worked | TIME.com swampland.time.com...