It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
bigfatfurrytexan
There is limitless resource. Instead of strapping the citizens with expensive bulbs that contain mercury, why not fund a Manhattan Project sized search for a solution?
crazyewok
reply to post by beezzer
So what th oether option? We just waste energy until there is none?
Something has to give to garentee the future energy security.
Yes there alot of other things that waste more energy but unlike light bulbs there isnt a more efficiant version yet. Light bulbs are the only thing thatw could give a slight enegry reduction without banning something complety.
You need to look long term here.
And I hate to say it but its going to get harder as the population increases and resources decrease
Unless we go into space.
beezzer
As the big ape stated, instead of looking for items to ban, look instead for new ways to create energy.edit on 15-12-2013 by beezzer because: (no reason given)
crazyewok
beezzer
As the big ape stated, instead of looking for items to ban, look instead for new ways to create energy.edit on 15-12-2013 by beezzer because: (no reason given)
I agree with that.
But until we do we need to reduce our enegry consumption. Buy time basicaly.
So forcing lower income people to pay 100x the amount they might have paid previously is a good thing?
beezzer
You could buy time without hurting people or the environment.
But this solution both hurts people and the environment.
Sounds like a lose/lose situation to me.
LeatherNLace
reply to post by beezzer
So forcing lower income people to pay 100x the amount they might have paid previously is a good thing?
I think 100x the amount is stretching it. Maybe 20x.
LED bulbs cost more, but they are likely to never burn out. So, sure, there is an additional cost up front, but they will see immediate returns on their electric bills and will see long-term benefits by the lack of necessity to ever buy bulbs again.
Just think of it...when you pass away, you can will your LED bulbs to your next of kin.
LeatherNLace
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
You do realize that you can purchase LED bulbs that do not contain hazardous substances. Honestly, I think the mercury bulbs should be banned too.
Meanwhile, another choice has been made on my behalf.
That seems to be the only way to make irresponsible people act responsibly. It's sad, but true.
19KTankCommander
Banned light bulbs
Banned fire arms
Banned freedom of speech when the Potus is around
Banned from not having health insurance or minim coverage
Banned from using the word Christmas in schools
Banned from having big soda drinks in New York
Banned from making large purchase with cash without the Patriot Act BS
Banned from Hunting Big foot, need a license now
Banned from protecting yourself and family (Lawyers)
Banned from making a decent earning (taxes)
What other things have they (Government) banned us from having or doing.
Makes me sick.
crazyewok
bigfatfurrytexan
There is limitless resource. Instead of strapping the citizens with expensive bulbs that contain mercury, why not fund a Manhattan Project sized search for a solution?
Actually I 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000% agree here.
Dump 100 billion into NASA.
Yeah I agree the light bulb things just a band aid really.edit on 15-12-2013 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)
bigfatfurrytexan
crazyewok
bigfatfurrytexan
There is limitless resource. Instead of strapping the citizens with expensive bulbs that contain mercury, why not fund a Manhattan Project sized search for a solution?
Actually I 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000% agree here.
Dump 100 billion into NASA.
Yeah I agree the light bulb things just a band aid really.edit on 15-12-2013 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)
Neil DeGrasse-Tyson has an interesting article on this very thing. His belief is that the lack of funding in NASA is helping to create a generation of unengaged dullards.
I think I am sensing a general agreement with his position.
CranialSponge
Meanwhile....
Warehouses, manufacturing plants, street lights, etc all around the world are using massive energy sucking metal hallide bulbs to light the way.
crazyewok
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
China has school lectures from space.......
The USA fights the teaching of evolution in school books.......
NASA has been so useless and bumbling since the last apollo mission its a joke.
We should be minning the moon and even mars by now.
edit on 15-12-2013 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)
badgerprints
bigfatfurrytexan
crazyewok
bigfatfurrytexan
There is limitless resource. Instead of strapping the citizens with expensive bulbs that contain mercury, why not fund a Manhattan Project sized search for a solution?
Actually I 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000% agree here.
Dump 100 billion into NASA.
Yeah I agree the light bulb things just a band aid really.edit on 15-12-2013 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)
Neil DeGrasse-Tyson has an interesting article on this very thing. His belief is that the lack of funding in NASA is helping to create a generation of unengaged dullards.
I think I am sensing a general agreement with his position.
Maybe it's the fact that we are intentionally using our education system to churn out dullards who don't understand HOW to get engaged or even WHY.
badgerprints
Maybe it's the fact that we are intentionally using our education system to churn out dullards who don't understand HOW to get engaged or even WHY.
bigfatfurrytexan
again...the petrodollar.
I was working to do some investing in an He3 operation that would come out of Austin. Then I was told, "Exxon-Mobile bought me out....sorry"
This apparently happens fairly frequently. And is only one method used to shut down such endeavors.