It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Eryiedes
tencap77
Hey, Christmas, is a Christian Holiday!
It facinates me how many christians don't realize christmas is actually a pagan celebration that they commandeered.
-Peace-
Eryiedes
reply to post by dragonridr
I am perfectly aware of why christians celebrate christmas.
I just don't care.
-Peace-
“Caucasian didn’t always simply mean ‘white’, as it does now. Before the eighteenth century, it was exclusively a term for people from Caucasus, a country lying on the border on Europe and Asia. But in the eighteenth century, a German anthropologist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach declared that the 245 skulls from the region that were in his possession were “the most beautiful race of men”. Adding to this erroneous idea that the Caucasian skulls were the most beautiful, was the idea that they were the oldest (they weren’t). He also expanded the definition of Caucasian to mean Europeans and the inhabitants of a region reaching from the ObiRiver in Russia to the Ganges to the Caspian Sea, plus northern Africans – a definition which technically even included Indians.”
“Of course, Caucasian may not immediately strike you as a racially offensive term. In its modern usage, Caucasian has become the PC word people use when they don’t want to say ‘white’. “If you want to show that you’re being dispassionate then you use the more scientific term Caucasian,” said Nell Irvin Painter, a historian who explored the term’s origins in her book The History of White People, as quoted in the New York Times. But the word was never meant to be such a benevolent one – Caucasian has been, since its inception, a racially-charged word with implications of white supremacy and superiority deeply embedded into its history.”
HigherTruth
Jesus was not white, neither was Mary.
If you subscribe to the belief that Jesus and Mary had a daughter 'Sara' (the Egyptian servant girl Mary traveled with after Jesus death), then you would probably know that the statue of St Sara, is actually that of a black girl. Which would mean that either Jesus, or Mary were likely as black as they come.
PICTURE OF ST SARA STATUE
Willtell
Actually the people of the Bible the Children of Israel(Jacob) or Hebrews, decedents of Abraham, were oriental Asiatics.
None where Europeans. They are racially classified as Semitic--Arabs and the original Jews or Hebrews.
The Romans were Europeans. But they weren’t connected to the Asiatic Semitic Hebrews, the people of Jesus.
The term Caucasian is a misnomer and was concocted by pseudo scientists who wanted to add Asiatics and North Africans and even dark Indians to the “Caucasian (white race).
“Caucasian didn’t always simply mean ‘white’, as it does now. Before the eighteenth century, it was exclusively a term for people from Caucasus, a country lying on the border on Europe and Asia. But in the eighteenth century, a German anthropologist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach declared that the 245 skulls from the region that were in his possession were “the most beautiful race of men”. Adding to this erroneous idea that the Caucasian skulls were the most beautiful, was the idea that they were the oldest (they weren’t). He also expanded the definition of Caucasian to mean Europeans and the inhabitants of a region reaching from the ObiRiver in Russia to the Ganges to the Caspian Sea, plus northern Africans – a definition which technically even included Indians.”
www.firstpost.com...
“Of course, Caucasian may not immediately strike you as a racially offensive term. In its modern usage, Caucasian has become the PC word people use when they don’t want to say ‘white’. “If you want to show that you’re being dispassionate then you use the more scientific term Caucasian,” said Nell Irvin Painter, a historian who explored the term’s origins in her book The History of White People, as quoted in the New York Times. But the word was never meant to be such a benevolent one – Caucasian has been, since its inception, a racially-charged word with implications of white supremacy and superiority deeply embedded into its history.”
MOMof3
reply to post by dragonridr
I assume you are referring to "Publius Lentenlius"? According to the Agape Bible Study web, scholars are divided on its authenticity. It is a copy of letter, that was copied, copied again, etc. As with all things of Faith, it is what you want to believe.
MOMof3
reply to post by dragonridr
I never heard of that one so I did some research. It is still a matter of choosing to believe this Mahan or not:
"Unanswered Questions about
Archko Volume Authenticity
until convinced by more than Dr. Goodspeed's very questionable,
after the fact (over 50 yrs) investigation, Bible Probe weighs in on
the side of Reverend Mahan
This book has been distributed in the past as both the "Archko Library" and the "Archo Volume".
In 1879 Rev W. D. Mahan a Boonville, Missouri minister published a pamphlet entitled "A Correct Transcript of Pilate's Court". In 1884, after the apparent successful distribution and wide spread popularity of the report, Mahan issued a new volume that contained an expanded version of this report along with eleven other such works, under the title, "The Archaeological and the Historical Writings of the Sanhedrin and Talmuds of the Jews", Translated from the Ancient Parchments and Scrolls at Constantinople and the Vatican at Rome.
In 1887, Rev. W. D. Mahan published a book entitled The Archko Volume. It is the results of his search for 1st century documents. Rev Mahan wrote that his research took him to the Vatican in Rome and to the Jewish Talmud's in Constantinople, Turkey; and that he was accompanied & assisted by two other "expert" scholars: Dr. McIntosh of Scotland and Dr. Twyman of England. He says that he was prompted to do this ever since 1856 when a German gentleman named H. C. Whydaman visited him and told him of his having worked at the Vatican and seen the Acta Pilati documents there.
During his 1883 trip to the Vatican, Mahan says that among many other writings he located a letter written on a papyrus scroll to Caesar from Pontius Pilate, dated about 31 A.D.. What is contained in Mahan's Archo Volume is truly awesome if the documents here turn out to have been really written by Pontius Pilate, Caiaphas, Herod and others. Bible Probe has seen nothing in these documents that would be in opposition to the teachings of the Christian Faith."
MOMof3
reply to post by dragonridr
Personally, I don't care what color Jesus' skin was. I wished people cared as much about the true spirit of his teachings of love and forgiveness. If Megyn were a true christian, never mind professional, that is how she would have formed her comment at this time of year.
Grimpachi
Huh...your argument is invalidated.
a fictional character made up to sell toys by macys