It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I read info on "Pink Disease" and found it very interesting. Especially the link to a family history of "Pink Disease" and a genetic predisposition to autism.
I cannot really dispute your view, it is just a view. I can only attempt to dispute the evidence you provide that supports your view. But that hasnt been very forthcoming.
I agree that healthy diet and good sanitation dramatically reduces the dangers of disease, but it certainly doesnt prevent illness nor cure cancer. There are many causes of disease, both bacterial and viral, and even other pollutants like radioactivity and poisons. A good diet will not prevent a radioactive particle lodged in the lung from killing you.
InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by golemina
If a pharmaceutical corporation discovered through it's research process that there was a blindingly simple and general cure for cancer what would they do with the information?
1. Publish.
2. Kill the project and seal the information.
3. Arrange for the research team to die in an accidental plane crash and for their facility to accidentally be burnt to the ground.
When there is literally 50+ billion $'s at stake, I'm going with 3. IMO, that is why Capitalism and healthcare are incompatible. I wish people would worry about the real conspiracies and not the chaff, like Chem-trails.
InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by golemina
If a pharmaceutical corporation discovered through it's research process that there was a blindingly simple and general cure for cancer what would they do with the information?
1. Publish.
2. Kill the project and seal the information.
3. Arrange for the research team to die in an accidental plane crash and for their facility to accidentally be burnt to the ground.
When there is literally 50+ billion $'s at stake, I'm going with 3. IMO, that is why Capitalism and healthcare are incompatible. I wish people would worry about the real conspiracies and not the chaff, like Chem-trails.
VoidHawk
I wonder just how important vaccines and fluoride etc would be if their were no multy billion dollar profits involved!!
During the past fifty years, the number of pharmaceutical companies making vaccines has decreased dramatically, and those that still make vaccines have reduced resources to make new ones. Pharmaceutical companies are gradually abandoning vaccines because the research, development, testing, and manufacture of vaccines are expensive and because the market to sell vaccines is much smaller than the market for other drug products. Congressional action could assure both a steady supply of existing vaccines and the promise of vaccines for the future.
Congress has the power to protect vaccines, a product that is vital to the health of the United States and the rest of the world.
Pharmaceutical companies are businesses, not public health agencies; they are not obligated to make vaccines. Events during the past fifty years have made the manufacture of vaccines more expensive and their sale less profitable. What follows here are case studies of two important vaccines, one for polio and the other for influenza, and the factors that either encouraged or discouraged their production.
InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by golemina
If a pharmaceutical corporation discovered through it's research process that there was a blindingly simple and general cure for cancer what would they do with the information?
1. Publish.
2. Kill the project and seal the information.
3. Arrange for the research team to die in an accidental plane crash and for their facility to accidentally be burnt to the ground.
When there is literally 50+ billion $'s at stake, I'm going with 3. IMO, that is why Capitalism and healthcare are incompatible. I wish people would worry about the real conspiracies and not the chaff, like Chem-trails.
golemina
So the model that I see happening is that 'pathogens' only appear where the body is weak, that all of the 'pathogens' are synergistic life forms that morph up and down some type of 'evolutionary' scale depending on the environment where they find themselves.
They are all the same 'pathogens'.
They don't make you sick, when you are sick, you make them.
golemina
(Chemtrails... well leave that... and less someone wants to link it in via a medical thing. Just say Ah!!!!)
OneManArmy
reply to post by golemina
Lets begin with leeks curing cancer.
Are you suggesting that Wales is the most cancer free country on earth?
Also will a healthy diet of clean water and fine food help prevent the inhabitants of Chernobyl from having birth defects and cancers?
Can coal miners prevent black lung with a healthy diet?
That should kick the thread off nicely.
ketsuko
reply to post by golemina
So, you are so confident in this that you would get bitten by a rabid animal and not seek treatment?
By your logic, Big Herb must also be killing off researchers who find non-herbal cures for diseases, right? BIG HERB ARE SUPPRESSING MAINSTREAM MEDICINE!!!one
InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by GetHyped
Big herb? That's amusing, thx. As for disease "cures" provided by big pharma, I'm interested in hearing about those. It's my understanding that they are not looking for cures, just treatments. In some cases treatments that have other treatable side-effects. I digress, you deserve the opportunity to cite some of the disease cures. The thread would benefit from that, I think.
OneManArmy
golemina
(Chemtrails... well leave that... and less someone wants to link it in via a medical thing. Just say Ah!!!!)
There are links, not strictly whats called "chemtrails" but definitely bacteria and viruses and chemicals sprayed from both planes and from ships and from the tops of buildings, but we will get to that I promise.
But that would require the existence of viruses and bacteria first.
golemina
OneManArmy
reply to post by golemina
Lets begin with leeks curing cancer.
Are you suggesting that Wales is the most cancer free country on earth?
Also will a healthy diet of clean water and fine food help prevent the inhabitants of Chernobyl from having birth defects and cancers?
Can coal miners prevent black lung with a healthy diet?
That should kick the thread off nicely.
Bravo OneManArmy!
Leaks and cancer? Really? Gonna check that out.
Wales is a really old country, the Welsh a really old people.
Miners, etc.
The probably with 'black lung' is an environmental one. The lungs are fairly good are cycling out debris, but if you are doing it in industrial doses... That can't BE good!
Same thing with radioactivity exposure... ie Chernobyl.
Curious thing about radioactivity, I believe what Tesla thought about it. That the radioactivity is the result of harmonics from the Ether.
Bottom line is we shouldn't be using those elements and concentrating them the way we do... The radiation wreaks some serious havoc with biological entities at a whole lot of different levels.
So, radioactivity is also an environmental factor.
GetHyped
InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by GetHyped
Big herb? That's amusing, thx. As for disease "cures" provided by big pharma, I'm interested in hearing about those. It's my understanding that they are not looking for cures, just treatments. In some cases treatments that have other treatable side-effects. I digress, you deserve the opportunity to cite some of the disease cures. The thread would benefit from that, I think.
Big pharma? That's amusing, thx. As for disease "cures" provided by big herb, I'm interested in hearing about those. It's my understanding that they are not looking for cures, just treatments. In some cases treatments that have other treatable side-effects. I digress, you deserve the opportunity to cite some of the disease cures. The thread would benefit from that, I think.
OneManArmy
golemina
So the model that I see happening is that 'pathogens' only appear where the body is weak, that all of the 'pathogens' are synergistic life forms that morph up and down some type of 'evolutionary' scale depending on the environment where they find themselves.
They are all the same 'pathogens'.
They don't make you sick, when you are sick, you make them.
I cannot accept that the human body can make "synergistic life forms" spontaneously out of nowhere based on the health of the human. I can accept that "symbiotic life forms" can flourish when they find a suitable host and conditions conducive to reproduction. I think that the "pathogens" are the by products of this reproduction, and also "bacterial and viral" poo.
Life forms do not just manifest themselves without a DNA "program". Its prevalent in all life. Without it life can not exist.
Im pretty sure that during the days of Pasteur they didnt have electron microscopes, and so were very limited on their understanding of cellular life. We have come so far since Pasteur. Not to take anything away from his genius given the tools he worked with.
golemina
OneManArmy
golemina
(Chemtrails... well leave that... and less someone wants to link it in via a medical thing. Just say Ah!!!!)
There are links, not strictly whats called "chemtrails" but definitely bacteria and viruses and chemicals sprayed from both planes and from ships and from the tops of buildings, but we will get to that I promise.
But that would require the existence of viruses and bacteria first.
Dude, I'm seriously flexible...
Release the hounds! Ahhh... the viruses and bacteria...