It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
alienjuggalo
reply to post by Aleister
I did look at the top right corner and just do not see anything.
Do you see the face in what I posted? Or am I crazy?
unb3k44n7
reply to post by Aleister
So, you took the time to author a thread about a thread you previously authored that points out the same things except with the addition of stating your disapproval of what people thought about your previous thread?
On another note, nobody really called 'you' a liar, since you didn't take the photo for 1 and you weren't the original author to claim there are faces in the clouds, you're just rehashing thoughts and photos that you read/found on the internet or elsewhere in which somebody else originally claimed/said could be seen in the photograph.
Aleister
unb3k44n7
reply to post by Aleister
So, you took the time to author a thread about a thread you previously authored that points out the same things except with the addition of stating your disapproval of what people thought about your previous thread?
On another note, nobody really called 'you' a liar, since you didn't take the photo for 1 and you weren't the original author to claim there are faces in the clouds, you're just rehashing thoughts and photos that you read/found on the internet or elsewhere in which somebody else originally claimed/said could be seen in the photograph.
Yes, I am the original author.
alienjuggalo
reply to post by Aleister
This is the upper right corner at 300%
Im trying to see what you are seeing lol but I just don't..
unb3k44n7
Aleister
unb3k44n7
reply to post by Aleister
So, you took the time to author a thread about a thread you previously authored that points out the same things except with the addition of stating your disapproval of what people thought about your previous thread?
On another note, nobody really called 'you' a liar, since you didn't take the photo for 1 and you weren't the original author to claim there are faces in the clouds, you're just rehashing thoughts and photos that you read/found on the internet or elsewhere in which somebody else originally claimed/said could be seen in the photograph.
Yes, I am the original author.
No, not technically.
The claim there are faces in the clouds was not your original claim or idea.
Phage
I guess you like Arken's threads too.
But seeing faces is what our brains are somewhat hard wired to do.
mysteryhistory.tv...
www.livescience.com...
edit on 12/5/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
alienjuggalo
The more I look at what I posted the more it stands out to me.
I circled what I am looking at so maybe it would stand out to others.
Well kinda circled
alienjuggalo
The more I look at what I posted the more it stands out to me.
I circled what I am looking at so maybe it would stand out to others.
Well kinda circlededit on 5-12-2013 by alienjuggalo because: (no reason given)
Aleister
unb3k44n7
Aleister
unb3k44n7
reply to post by Aleister
So, you took the time to author a thread about a thread you previously authored that points out the same things except with the addition of stating your disapproval of what people thought about your previous thread?
On another note, nobody really called 'you' a liar, since you didn't take the photo for 1 and you weren't the original author to claim there are faces in the clouds, you're just rehashing thoughts and photos that you read/found on the internet or elsewhere in which somebody else originally claimed/said could be seen in the photograph.
Yes, I am the original author.
No, not technically.
The claim there are faces in the clouds was not your original claim or idea.
Yes, although the James Bevel face was "discovered" in 2009 the other faces, including the only one I'm focused on in this thread, were "discovered" as I wrote the uncyclopedia page. Maybe I'm good at seeing faces in clouds, but the key is to point those out well enough so that other people can see them. I'm trying to do so without having to trace them, as I don't know how to do that and haven't learned since yesterday. Thanks for looking for clarity.edit on 5-12-2013 by Aleister because: (no reason given)