If Thoughts Can Do This To Water – Imagine What They Can Do To Us

reply to post by cyoshi


Not eactly food, but certainly a drink for thought.

Not to rain on anyone's parade, but do your research,

This is utter nonsense and BS.


Masaru Emoto admitted that he just froze water and then spent ages looking for the crystals he liked in the bottles.

Think about fractals here, Human intention may be able to sway it an extremely small nearly un calculable scale, But it will NEVER override natures own design, Fractals will always be the answer, and thus some will be beautiful and others less aesthetically pleasing, but NEVER will there be a bottle of uniformly "beautiful " crystals, Masaru Emoto merely found the crystals he through fit the bottles and publishes that.

Namaste.

Without a doubt, Thought has an effect on circumstances. Not really sure about water though. ~$heopleNation

s4196606
reply to post by cyoshi

 

Its really hard to uniformly freeze something. In most cases, for any given block of ice, some crystals will be uniform, others will have imperfections (caused by incomplete ice crystal propagation, the presence of trapped gases and particles, etc.). The implication of this is that depending on how the microstructure is visualised (i.e. the location/ plane being viewed under the microscope), areas will look completely different within the same sample.
As other people have also pointed out, wether something is aesthetically pleasing or not is entirely subjective, you cant draw scientific conclusions from that. Sounds like another new age scam to me.

How dare you look at this logically!!!! Just buy Mr emoto's majic happy water and it will turn you into a beautiful ice crystal

reply to post by cyoshi


great topic OP, s&f although i have nothing to add currently, just wanted say thanks for an enlightening topic in a very desolate place.

This is an excerpt from the movie, "what The Bleep Do We Know?" if you haven't seen it, I would highly recommend it. I know it's cheesy but, it will change your life in some level.

This is the third thread with What the bleep content today. Talk about synchronicity.

reply to post by AliceBleachWhite


Well you would be wrong. They do it the other way around. They did it with rice too and you don't need a flash freezer or a microscope to try it yourself.
vimeo.com...

reply to post by adjensen


You will always find detractors if that is all you look for. Try googling for supporters and you will find as many. Know what they say about opinions and a holes? Everybody's got one.

reply to post by James1982


Actually it was crystals or no crystals not pretty or ugly but see what you want.
Ever say Grace before a meal? Why?

reply to post by Hr2burn


Only if they want it to. They don't want it to.

reply to post by WiseThinker


It's nonsense because you say so?
Like I said do fair research not just looking for detractors.

reply to post by OceanSpray


Well the desolation is leaking in here. Knew that would happen. I must be psychic.

The military have know for quite some time (and have been R&D'n) the phenomenon of non physical interconnectivity between humans / human body parts. They proven this to be empirically true and it's just a matter of finding out how and why this occurs.

...Then, as is our species' wont, we can exploit the process in order to kill each other better!

reply to post by AutumnWitch657


Weak response,

Dr. Emoto’s procedure for photographing crystals has no controlled means of ensuring that experimenter’s bias is prevented or minimized. For example, his methodology does not ensure that the obtained results are not selected consciously or subconsciously by the photographer. In fact, in the Maui News interview, Dr. Emoto specifically stated, “I do not require any blind tests on any samples,” but rather he believes that “the researcher’s aesthetic sense and character is the most important aspect when taking crystal photographs.” Emoto’s belief that ice crystal formation is sensitive to human thought lead him to select technicians who would not affect crystal formation with negative thoughts over technicians who had formal research experience.

Source


You can find hundreds of articles and interviews with Dr. Emoto where he basically admits to selective sampling, This means none of his results are even the in slightest reliable, He even admitted that the test cannot be redone due to this factor.

Namaste.

the scientist in this video .. said.. on another interview, stated that he name the vials AFTER they looked at them under the microscope .. there's a HUGE thread on here for the same video.. it's been done to death ..

cyoshi
Source: Rise Earth

Physics has been hinting for some time at the deep bond between consciousness and matter.....this interesting article is another little piece of the pie for those that are figuring out for themselves that we shape space and this ability within us is being harnessed into creating the mundane everyday reality that so many have to endure.

It's not a science. It's a science 2.0
Debunkers can't get the same results because of their low vibrations
reply to post by donktheclown

donktheclown
This is amazing as well...Watch what happens at approximately 46 minutes into the video.....The Truth Behind The Energy Lie.

Good stuff. Enough food for thoughts and its own threads

AutumnWitch657
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite

 

Well you would be wrong. They do it the other way around. They did it with rice too and you don't need a flash freezer or a microscope to try it yourself.
vimeo.com...

I checked out your link and the video was posted 9 months ago and there are no updates.

That's long enough for a full term pregnancy.

Why is that?

reply to post by cyoshi


Can't wait to read this later

What disturbs me about these kinds of experiments is the potential for mind control. It seems to be part and parcel of the "always be happy", positive-thinking mindset that our culture uses to keep anyone from questioning authority and calling out abusive or wrong behavior. People have a range of thoughts and emotions for a reason. There is no such thing as "negative" emotion--emotions are just emotions. When we start to label certain thoughts and emotions as "damaging" or wrong, we are wandering into dangerous territory. Personally, I don't want to live in a world where everyone is going around in a haze of positive thinking and happy feelings. That's not reality. For example, no major social movements in society have ever occurred without harnessing the power of anger. Anger is an appropriate response to boundary violations. We need it. Ignoring and repression emotions that don't look pretty isn't healthy.