Tesla's Longitudinal/Scalar Wave

J.P. Morgan (one of the world's wealthiest men at the time of tesla) never would support tesla in his idea of free transmission of energy, because he said that there is no profit in it. this is why (I believe) that this area of innovation has been deliberately stunted, no profit in free energy. and let's face it, if there ever was a cure for cancer, a lot of people would collectively lose billions of dollars. the fact the American Cancer Society has been funded for over 4 decades with no cure, says it all, especially in this era of genetic manipulation. I think there are a lot of inventions, and breakthroughs, that have been suppressed because it would cut off the profit pipeline

Mary Rose
reply to post by Bedlam

 

You probably don't know enough about what he is saying to judge.

How much have you listened to?

I've watched about 50' and this meyl dude, is talking a lot of sense.
He has made stuff and sold to unis, tho ive never heard of meyl till
you posted the video.
So now most of the tesla tech can be harvested I guess.
Funny tho, he is a prof. and has not lost his job or his life,
an exception tptb has allowed?

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection


I think the ones who get targeted for suppression of the violent kind are the inventors who have devices that would go into consumers' hands and replace the existing paradigm.

Meyl's kit is for educational purposes.

But I'm certain he is subjected to ridicule, slander, and disinformation.

reply to post by Bedlam


I posted that because it seems to be important to what distinguishes Meyl's work from mainstream science.

ChaoticOrder
Having watched a few minutes of the video, it looks like it will be an interesting watch, besides the fact that they are trying to sell some sort of experimental kit.

Meyl said at that he, personally, is not earning money from the kit, shortly after 40:56:

Listen at shortly after 44:21 re. today we're using the wrong wave for mobile phoning:

Mary Rose
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

 

I think the ones who get targeted for suppression of the violent kind are the inventors who have devices that would go into consumers' hands and replace the existing paradigm.

Meyl's kit is for educational purposes.

But I'm certain he is subjected to ridicule, slander, and disinformation.

Or prolly a case of giving him enough rope till he hangs himself, just like they
did to prof laithwaite, ning li and podkletnov etc

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection


How did each of them hang themselves, so to speak?

Listen at 1:04:25 re. the physics of today have no idea about the meaning of the results of Schrödinger's equation:

In textbooks it says the speed of light is a constant but in real life, it isn't, shortly after 1:16:50:

Mary Rose
In textbooks it says the speed of light is a constant but in real life, it isn't,

So, we are going to compare complex science with primary school level books?

Many things, in every field, are presented in their least complex form until the student is at a level to grasp the full (sometimes not even full) complexity of the subject at hand.

Mary Rose
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

 

How did each of them hang themselves, so to speak?

They lost their jobs at the unis and were lured elsewhere, where laithwaite
died mysteriously, the fate of ning li and podkletnov is unknown

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection


But I thought you were saying that they exposed themselves as being wrong in some way. That's not what you were saying?

reply to post by peck420


I don't believe that's relevant to what he was saying.

Mary Rose
I don't believe that's relevant to what he was saying.

Of course it wouldn't be....it is very hard to hawk garbage when you tell people the truth.
2nd.

Mary Rose
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

 

I think the ones who get targeted for suppression of the violent kind are the inventors who have devices that would go into consumers' hands and replace the existing paradigm.

in the real world they end up billionaires.

reply to post by mbkennel


Only when the inventions work. If they don't, you write "As envisioned by Tesla" on the box and sell 'em on YouTube.

Mary Rose
I think the ones who get targeted for suppression of the violent kind are the inventors who have devices that would go into consumers' hands and replace the existing paradigm.

"...that would go..."

So your assertion is then that they get suppressed BEFORE they start to sell the products?

Because I fail to see how a home hobbyist who creates a small Tesla device for sale could be stopped *before* they sell it on Craigslist, or Ebay, or their own website, or an ad in the local paper, or any of the other multitude of websites on the internet, or the darknet.

The darknet supposedly sells murders, drugs and childporn... but somehow you say that an inventor can be stopped BEFORE he puts a small Tesla device up for sale there?

I'm not finding your argument credible.

reply to post by AlphaHawk

Meyl's paper on this has been retracted...

Exactly what does "DNA and Cell Resonance" have to do with longitudinal electric waves?

Pseudoscience at it's worst it would appear.

According to your excerpt, the paper was retracted because it appeared to be plagiarizing information from older papers, not because it was talking about pseudo-scientific concepts.

Tesla has two different patents which cover the concept of longitudinal electric waves, he wouldn't have submitted those patents if he didn't believe the idea worked.

Quite frankly I would rather trust the word of Tesla than the word of ignorant skeptics in this thread who think they know what they are talking about when they don't.

ChaoticOrder


Tesla has two different patents which cover the concept of longitudinal electric waves, he wouldn't have submitted those patents if he didn't believe the idea worked.

Which two would that be?

Quite frankly I would rather trust the word of Tesla than the word of ignorant skeptics in this thread who think they know what they are talking about when they don't.

That LCD you're reading this by is a living refutation of longitudinal EM.