It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
intrptr
Anyone having trouble with timeouts while posting?
This is getting really annoying
onequestion
reply to post by intrptr
Skeptic broke ATS
On topic, i dont know what to believe about Fukishima, i am not educated enough on nuclear physics. Maybe i should take a class?
angkory13
The world as we know is changing. Everyday a bad new is added. Can you preview consequences of a world with radioactive Oceans ?
www.cbc.ca...
All water on the Earth, including seawater, has some radionuclides in it. In the following table, the oceans' volumes were calculated from the 1990 World Almanac:
Pacific = 6.549 x 10-17 m3
Atlantic = 3.095 x 10-17 m3
Total = 1.3 x 10-18 m3
onequestion
reply to post by Thebel
how do you know that natural radiation is much much stronger?
intrptr
But none of them point us to results of studies that tell us whats wrong with the animals or what current levels of toxicity and radioactivity in the Pacific ocean actually is.