It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A THR investigation has found that, unbeknownst to the public, these incidents on Hollywood’s most prominent productions are but two of the troubling cases of animal injury and death that directly call into question the 136-year-old Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit’s assertion that “No Animals Were Harmed” on productions it monitors. Alarmingly, it turns out that audiences reassured by the organization’s famous disclaimer should not necessarily assume it is true. In fact, the AHA has awarded its “No Animals Were Harmed” credit to films and TV shows on which animals were injured during production. It justifies this on the grounds that the animals weren’t intentionally harmed or the incidents occurred while cameras weren’t rolling.
HBO canceled its series Luck a day after Real Awesome Jet sustained head injuries that were too severe to be treated.
The full scope of animal injuries and deaths in entertainment productions cannot be known. But in multiple cases examined by THR, the AHA has not lived up to its professed role as stalwart defenders of animals — who, unlike their human counterparts, didn’t themselves sign up for such work. While the four horse deaths on HBO’s Luck made headlines last year, there are many extraordinary incidents that never bubble up to make news.
Aleister
reply to post by Stormdancer777
If a movie has that label attached, yet served non-vegetarian food on tables and buffets set up for film crew members and actors, then it is not only unearned, but misleading.
Aleister
reply to post by Stormdancer777
If a movie has that label attached, yet served non-vegetarian food on tables and buffets set up for film crew members and actors, then it is not only unearned, but misleading.
Chamberf=6
I guess it's all about the bottom line--money.
Just imagine how profits would drop if they said "(insert number here) animals were accidentally or intentionally harmed or killed during this production."
Aleister
reply to post by Stormdancer777
If a movie has that label attached, yet served non-vegetarian food on tables and buffets set up for film crew members and actors, then it is not only unearned, but misleading.
rickymouse
I think people who watched these shows, and know animals, have known that animals do get hurt making these movies. If I see a dog twist it's ankle by running, I know the running caused the injury...someone monitoring this on the show might say that dogs hurt their legs running all the time, we have to discount this injury, it could have happened anyway. It is all a judgement call, the desire of the people doing the monitoring is to make sure their employment continues so will see things the way that the income allows them to see. This is common perception in this country.
bigfatfurrytexan
When "animals dying" equates to a squirrel being squashed, I am not so sure I am that concerned. But when it relates to purposefully overworking animals, or putting them in harms way....that is a different matter entirely.
Kittens die everyday. I swerve around their remains on the streets all the time. So kittens dying isn't shocking or horrible. What is horrible is if they died because someone chose to ignore their basic needs. When you hold an animal captive, you are damn well responsible for their well being.
.
A tiger used in 'Life of Pi' nearly drowned, according to a monitor from the American Humane Association
If you were beaten on a consistent basis, you too might learn what is coming if you don't display the desired behavior.