It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SWCCFAN
My wife and I recently had our first child together. She had a c-section and we stayed in the hospital for 5 days. After the c-section she developed some bleeding more than normal so she became anemic almost to the point of needing a transfusion.
After we had been home for a few days she passed some rather large clots and was in severe pain to the point she could barely walk. As a former EMT I felt she needed to get to the ER and be checked out. The first question they asked is how we intended to pay for the visit.
We have full coverage insurance so it wasn't an issue but I fear if we didn't care may have been delayed or rejected all together, even though I know they can't do that .... Yet!
Once ACA is fully implemented you will be expected to have it. My question is what if you don't?
n 1986, Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure public access to emergency services regardless of ability to pay. Section 1867 of the Social Security Act imposes specific obligations on Medicare-participating hospitals that offer emergency services to provide a medical screening examination (MSE) when a request is made for examination or treatment for an emergency medical condition (EMC), including active labor, regardless of an individual's ability to pay.
DontTreadOnMe
If you have insurance, there is now a large co-pay for treatment....usually payable in advance.
So, having insurance assumes ability to pay, I think.
I don't know how it would work in the ER is you told them you cannot afford the deductible...and you weren't dying or in some acute situation....like bleeding profusely.
He has had a migraine pain level headache for the last 3 days [he says more ]
When he gets up and walks around.... he gets dizzy, sees spots and his vision gets blurry. He gets sick to his stomach and throws up.
when he is sitting to do hoemework, ... the pain increases and its almost like nacholepty....he gets supper sleepy.
We have tried ice packs, Tylenol etc. but the spots in his eyeS/dizzinesss/pain is getting worse.
He iss at the ER right now and I am waiting to hear back.
vkey08
no matter the ailment no matter the cause, ER's must take you, no matter what..
DontTreadOnMe
If you have insurance, there is now a large co-pay for treatment....usually payable in advance.
So, having insurance assumes ability to pay, I think.
I don't know how it would work in the ER is you told them you cannot afford the deductible...and you weren't dying or in some acute situation....like bleeding profusely.
VoidHawk
vkey08
no matter the ailment no matter the cause, ER's must take you, no matter what..
So what does op do if he/she is being told money first?
Like another poster above said (canadian?), in the uk that kid with those symptoms WOULD have been sent an ambulance and been admitted to hospital, the money is irrelevant over here.
I cant believe you americans have let them stitch you up like this, its the year 2013 and money is more important than health? I thought america was a civilised country!
Mind you, if its a shot of vaccine poison, then they'll chase you to the ends of the earth to force it into you.
But Obamacare’s pain is spread much broader. Those with employer-provided insurance are also getting stung. Policies that previously asked for manageable contributions from employees will now carry either much higher monthly premiums or outrageous deductibles and co-pays, or both. Out-of-pocket costs are leaping to an average $5,000 to $6,000 annually for individuals, and $10,000 to $12,000 for families.
~~~~~~~
Obamacare was sold as a path to making America healthier by giving everyone insurance coverage. But what good is insurance you can’t afford to use? How many people will put off recommended tests and treatments because they don’t have the money to pay the deductible?
VoidHawk
vkey08
no matter the ailment no matter the cause, ER's must take you, no matter what..
So what does op do if he/she is being told money first?
Like another poster above said (canadian?), in the uk that kid with those symptoms WOULD have been sent an ambulance and been admitted to hospital, the money is irrelevant over here.
I cant believe you americans have let them stitch you up like this, its the year 2013 and money is more important than health? I thought america was a civilised country!
Mind you, if its a shot of vaccine poison, then they'll chase you to the ends of the earth to force it into you.
DontTreadOnMe
If you have insurance, there is now a large co-pay for treatment....usually payable in advance.
So, having insurance assumes ability to pay, I think.
I don't know how it would work in the ER is you told them you cannot afford the deductible...and you weren't dying or in some acute situation....like bleeding profusely.
VoidHawk
reply to post by palmalBlue2
You know, over here, the msm present obama and obamacare as something wonderful, and I just know they're brain washing the people to believe we should adopt the same system, so thank you for what you've shown us, it will be shown to everyone I know.