So you have a problem with Alex Jones ?

reply to post by EyezWideOpen

. Not only does he use other peoples information,

But we all use other peoples information, Do we not ?
Is there a copyright for information ?

reply to post by randyvs


Why Alex Why??
You were great on the BBC's One Show
www.google.co.uk...(presenter)& ei=YUmSUqPSBsGt0QXvw4HICQ&usg=AFQjCNEA_0nUzKygS607SIX4bxq6gtWWVg&sig2=4i7UpDaKf2UboAcZADFggg&bvm=bv.56988011,d.d2k

randyvs
So if you have a problem, tell me,

WHY?

I don't think many conspiracy theorists have a problem with him, but it would be dumb to worship the guy. He's obviously working as an information agent, helping the government tank by releasing bits of "truth" to the public. And by tank I mean collapse, its a slow process but the signs are everywhere. I was at Wallmart today and saw Mens Axe frangrance now has the smell : Anarchy. Anarchy means absence of government. You really want to smell like that?? Anarchy references have stepped up major in the past few years. I was just watching White House Down, and one of the main terrorists has a blatant Anarchy tattoo. Many PS3/PS4 shooter games let you customize your mask or signature card with an Anarchy symbol. Meaning you are running around shooting people with a fat anarchy symbol right on your face. One of the Dark Knight DVD's has an Anarchy symbol hidden In it:

The Dark Knight DVD

Don't forget the hit show : Sons of Anarchy.

WeRpeons
reply to post by randyvs

 

I think it's more on how he projects himself. I think when you express yourself in a manner where you're yelling at people to get your point across, your message gets lost. People than look at you like you're crazy and don't take you seriously anymore. Not only that, you create fuel for the media to label you as being obnoxious, out of control, and a person who believes in crazy conspiracies. Unfortunately, he's his own worst enemy. He needs to tone down his delivery, and than I think more people will take notice and take him more seriously.

Very true. Someone I knew asked me about NWO and did I have any links, etc. At the time, all I could think of was AJ. My friend went once, told me couldn't stand Alex's yelling, and then totally lost interest. And he had started out quite interested in the subject.

reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin


You know, I meant to get to your reply but never did. I 'll just say, I think
your grievances are well stated and show good reason for you to
feel the way you do.

reply to post by randyvs


There's a difference between using other peoples information, and declaring it as your own.

Yes there is Deffinatly something wrong with that. And when I hear people do this, I instantly stop listening to them. Because I know what thier agenda is.

reply to post by leostokes

We agree he is "a loud mouth".
Bully? No.

A bully is a big kid that beats up on little kids. Here is the definition from the dictionary: a person who uses strength or power to harm or intimidate those who are weaker.

Many people that AJ opposes are not weaker than him but stronger. Piers Morgan for example.

What you mean is that he is an "intimidator".

So you are saying he is not a bully by showing me a video of him screaming at a guy, shouting him down calling him names (pretty sure he calls him a shill) when he asks hims some very reasonable questions on TV, lets not forget Alex Jones started up a vendetta against this guy a petition to have him removed form the country because ale didn't agree with his politics. . That does not go to prove he is not a bully, actually it proves the opposite that he dose bully people to get his view across, I dont care what your dictionary definition has to say.

The very fact you have to go to the dictionary to get a definition of "bully" is in its self rather worrying. I dont want to argue semantics but you can "bully" a individual with by resorting to petty name calling, its like the play ground bully shouting four eyes at the guy with glasses. Same thing that Alex does on occasion, caller calls into his show to say he disagrees with him and Alex says he has a "small brain" and is "retarded". Do that on ATS you would be quite rightly banned.

He is a bully and a show man shill for the reasons i outlined in my first post.

OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by leostokes

 

We agree he is "a loud mouth".
Bully? No.

A bully is a big kid that beats up on little kids. Here is the definition from the dictionary: a person who uses strength or power to harm or intimidate those who are weaker.

Many people that AJ opposes are not weaker than him but stronger. Piers Morgan for example.

What you mean is that he is an "intimidator".

So you are saying he is not a bully by showing me a video of him screaming at a guy, shouting him down calling him names (pretty sure he calls him a shill) when he asks hims some very reasonable questions on TV, lets not forget Alex Jones started up a vendetta against this guy a petition to have him removed form the country because ale didn't agree with his politics. . That does not go to prove he is not a bully, actually it proves the opposite that he dose bully people to get his view across, I dont care what your dictionary definition has to say.

The very fact you have to go to the dictionary to get a definition of "bully" is in its self rather worrying. I dont want to argue semantics but you can "bully" a individual with by resorting to petty name calling, its like the play ground bully shouting four eyes at the guy with glasses. Same thing that Alex does on occasion, caller calls into his show to say he disagrees with him and Alex says he has a "small brain" and is "retarded". Do that on ATS you would be quite rightly banned.

He is a bully and a show man shill for the reasons i outlined in my first post.

You have to remember that most people that stick for him worship him and they're just going to ignore your post because it makes sense.

reply to post by onequestion


That's what I was doing, he just happens to ping my radar for having some stuff that's way off and some stuff that's not. But because he covers some stuff that I think it total BS....I put anything sourced with him and take it with a grain of salt until I put it under a lot of scruteny.

Yes some of what he says comes to pass, but that can be said of a lot of people other then him too and he also says a lot of # that has little evidence to back it up and doesn't come to pass.

OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by leostokes

 

We agree he is "a loud mouth".
Bully? No.

A bully is a big kid that beats up on little kids. Here is the definition from the dictionary: a person who uses strength or power to harm or intimidate those who are weaker.

Many people that AJ opposes are not weaker than him but stronger. Piers Morgan for example.

What you mean is that he is an "intimidator".

So you are saying he is not a bully by showing me a video of him screaming at a guy, shouting him down calling him names (pretty sure he calls him a shill) when he asks hims some very reasonable questions on TV, lets not forget Alex Jones started up a vendetta against this guy a petition to have him removed form the country because ale didn't agree with his politics. . That does not go to prove he is not a bully, actually it proves the opposite that he dose bully people to get his view across, I dont care what your dictionary definition has to say.

The very fact you have to go to the dictionary to get a definition of "bully" is in its self rather worrying. I dont want to argue semantics but you can "bully" a individual with by resorting to petty name calling, its like the play ground bully shouting four eyes at the guy with glasses. Same thing that Alex does on occasion, caller calls into his show to say he disagrees with him and Alex says he has a "small brain" and is "retarded". Do that on ATS you would be quite rightly banned.

He is a bully and a show man shill for the reasons i outlined in my first post.

America fought a revolutionary war against England. Because they wanted to take our guns. We won. We made a constitution that prevents the government from taking our guns. So that we can defend ourselves against the government.

Piers Morgan is British. He is not an american citizen. He has come to America with a TV program where he pushes gun control. It is more than a simple case of political difference. It is illegal because it goes against the constitution. Piers Morgan should be deported. Thats better than shooting him isn't it?

reply to post by Atmas

You have to remember that most people that stick for him worship him and they're just going to ignore your post because it makes sense.

Did you notice that I did not ignore the post?

That means you were wrong.

Why were you wrong? Because you think of yourself as a mind reader. You are sure you know my motives.

Let me make a suggestion to you. You do not know who I worship.

reply to post by leostokes

The very fact you have to go to the dictionary to get a definition of "bully" is in its self rather worrying.

Well if you make up your own definitions people will misunderstand you, will they not?

reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin

I dont want to argue semantics but you can "bully" a individual with by resorting to petty name calling, its like the play ground bully shouting four eyes at the guy with glasses. Same thing that Alex does on occasion, caller calls into his show to say he disagrees with him and Alex says he has a "small brain" and is "retarded". Do that on ATS you would be quite rightly banned.

You just contradicted yourself. You say you are not going to argue semantics and then you proceed to do it.

reply to post by randyvs


well.. the police have a point..

standing on the side of the freeway to hand out leafletts is ...hmmm.. how shall I say this .. pretty damm dangerous ? ! LOL

Trust me bro, I'm completely down for FS, but, suing the police dept over something that is trying to protect the citizens and the police themselves is a little extreme.

reply to post by Komodo

Trust me bro, I'm completely down for FS, but, suing the police dept over something that is trying to protect the citizens and the police themselves is a little extreme.

Agreed, And I'll add that suing any police dept ? Isn't worth the risk to your health.

reply to post by randyvs


I agree that Alex does some excellent work. One must recognize his limitations though. For example, guests who deviate from Alex's mantra appear only once. Instead those that toe the Jones party line come back again and again. The two that come to mind are Webster Tarpley and Jerome Corsi. One works for World Net Daily and is controlled. I helped get Adrian Salbuchi a fluently bilingual Argentinian investigative journalist who, rather than say yes Alex, upstaged Alex and was never invited back. Jones has a powerful personality and cannot tolerate anyone who does not allow him to control and manipulate the flow of the conversation.
His show rambles on for 3 hrs, 2 of which are Alex rants. I have outgrown this as there is 15 minutes of info wrapped up in a 3 hr show.
Alex does not have his history of ww2 sorted out. All the bad in that war fell on Hitler's shoulders. He is not the guy to take on the Bolshevik jewish regime under Joe Stalin who committed horrible atrocities against German Civilians and massacred the Polish upper class in Kaityn.
Alex will not use the word zionist. Instead he uses the euphanism "nazis" when criticizing them. In a sense I don't blame him otherwise he would have Foxman all over his case as the former tries to justify his $650k salary.
Some people claim although I cannot verify this is some of his funding comes through Skunkworks, the Locheed group. This I cannot verify but it would be an interesting exercise to try and determine who is funding him.

leostokes
reply to post by Atmas

 

You have to remember that most people that stick for him worship him and they're just going to ignore your post because it makes sense.

Did you notice that I did not ignore the post?

That means you were wrong.

Why were you wrong? Because you think of yourself as a mind reader. You are sure you know my motives.

Let me make a suggestion to you. You do not know who I worship.

edit on 25-11-2013 by leostokes because: ? instead of .

You ignored the facts he pointed out and pretty much changed the subject because you were wrong, so in a sense, you did ignore it.

Atmas

leostokes
reply to post by Atmas

 

You have to remember that most people that stick for him worship him and they're just going to ignore your post because it makes sense.

Did you notice that I did not ignore the post?

That means you were wrong.

Why were you wrong? Because you think of yourself as a mind reader. You are sure you know my motives.

Let me make a suggestion to you. You do not know who I worship.

edit on 25-11-2013 by leostokes because: ? instead of .

You ignored the facts he pointed out and pretty much changed the subject because you were wrong, so in a sense, you did ignore it.

I will no longer reply to your posts in any thread.

leostokes

Atmas

leostokes
reply to post by Atmas

 

You have to remember that most people that stick for him worship him and they're just going to ignore your post because it makes sense.

Did you notice that I did not ignore the post?

That means you were wrong.

Why were you wrong? Because you think of yourself as a mind reader. You are sure you know my motives.

Let me make a suggestion to you. You do not know who I worship.

edit on 25-11-2013 by leostokes because: ? instead of .

You ignored the facts he pointed out and pretty much changed the subject because you were wrong, so in a sense, you did ignore it.

I will no longer reply to your posts in any thread.

Because I was right? Oh well, your loss