It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
iPods will be outlawed so we can hear when we are about to be molested.
SkepticOverlord
The important thing to note here, is that it's not illegal to ride a bicycle less than 15mph on sidewalks zoned residential anywhere in the country.
Some cities and counties prohibit riding bicycles on sidewalks. Other local laws deal with parking of bikes and use of pedestrian or special bicycle facilities. Check with your local government to learn what these laws are
gariac
SkepticOverlord
The important thing to note here, is that it's not illegal to ride a bicycle less than 15mph on sidewalks zoned residential anywhere in the country.
I'm not sure what law school you went to, but there are no nationwide vehicle codes. Such codes are left up to the states with the feds using coercion (withholding highway funding) to get their way.
Further, plenty of cities have restrictions on riding on the sidewalk. They do so for a good reason, namely they don't want to be named in a lawsuit for allowing dangerous activity.
Some cities and counties prohibit riding bicycles on sidewalks. Other local laws deal with parking of bikes and use of pedestrian or special bicycle facilities. Check with your local government to learn what these laws are
from
CA bicycle law
The guy that was arrested was trying to evade the police. When does that ever work out to be a good plan? Uh, that would be never. Once you run, the police have probable cause. This comes under the umbrella of exigent circumstances:
exigent circumstances wiki
Did I say umbrella? I should have said humongous ginormous fish net. If you are the type of person to push the envelope, you need to know the law as well as the police do.
Odds are this will go down as a good bust.
starfoxxx
gariac
SkepticOverlord
The important thing to note here, is that it's not illegal to ride a bicycle less than 15mph on sidewalks zoned residential anywhere in the country.
I'm not sure what law school you went to, but there are no nationwide vehicle codes. Such codes are left up to the states with the feds using coercion (withholding highway funding) to get their way.
Further, plenty of cities have restrictions on riding on the sidewalk. They do so for a good reason, namely they don't want to be named in a lawsuit for allowing dangerous activity.
Some cities and counties prohibit riding bicycles on sidewalks. Other local laws deal with parking of bikes and use of pedestrian or special bicycle facilities. Check with your local government to learn what these laws are
from
CA bicycle law
The guy that was arrested was trying to evade the police. When does that ever work out to be a good plan? Uh, that would be never. Once you run, the police have probable cause. This comes under the umbrella of exigent circumstances:
exigent circumstances wiki
Did I say umbrella? I should have said humongous ginormous fish net. If you are the type of person to push the envelope, you need to know the law as well as the police do.
Odds are this will go down as a good bust.
Better NOT RUN FROM US BOOOY! Or we gonna f you up!!
That's right everyone look what we do to runners, your lucky if we just beat you to a bloody pulp, and don't shoot you dead.
Nephalim
reply to post by Metaphysique
That's why they have those armored cars now I guess. In case they do some bs to people and people lynch the hell out of them. Pretty sad really. Cant say it (police brutality) happens out this way that I know of.
Still not sure what the point is in bothering some person riding a bike. I should probably say this though. Looking back at that Trayvon issue, i felt that the other guy was protecting himself once trayvon had him on the ground pounding the # out of his punk bitch ass honestly. I guess it didn't matter that no matter what, trayvon wasnt armed and had no real chance anyway, whether he was stronger or not. And silly me the Pres says "That could have been me", hell that can be anyone.
Bothers me a little bit. Your average citizen isnt walking around with a pistol on his hip, or equipped like a police officer, or even a soldier. Theres no shotgun in the car, or tazers, pepper spray, armored vehicle, bullet proof vest... no dog.. cant forget the partner system, radio and multiple units responding. Come to think of it, id have no real chance of getting over on any cop.
I have no problem with the local police, I know some of them. They're good folks. But some of these people across the country.. I don't know. The poster above me summed it up in those parts pretty well. You guys may wanna reconsider your methods of dealing with folks. It doesn't have to be like that.edit on 26-11-2013 by Nephalim because: (no reason given)[/quote/]
Normally I wouldn't respond to a quote like this, except for the elitist remarks that obviously are meant to degrade an entire segment of the country. let's dismantle some misconceptions, now shall we?
Firstly, in "those" parts and "those" people.Just to whom exactly are you referring? Perchance you mean Veterans, or people whom simply want to be left alone by the increasingly invasive control system? Anyone different than you? White people? Black people? Oh!! I have it, you were underhandedly implying that anyone who would actually do something as radical and insane as protect themselves in their own home against people who have been shown beyond a shadow of a doubt to assault, murder, and kidnap(because just what is an unlawful arrest exactly) OR cover up for their "brothers" who do the same, are some kind of inherent danger to everyone else.
Either you are talking about the ghetto(which actually was a Jewish term originally, so put that race card away) but I don't think so, being as you are taking little dead thug's side in a debate that has been over for a little while now,which, to be honest I am not sure why. Little dead thug meeting his deserved end at the hands of someone he was trying to beat to death has nothing to do with the thread or my post. My post was focused entirely on people who think they can swagger and play the tough guy all the whilst violating the rights of the people they swore a sacred Oath to protect. The only other candidates for "those people" I can think of in popular culture are rural predominantly white people, though I suppose you would refer to them as hill folk, peckerwoods, hillbillies, white trash, have I left any ridiculous socio-economic label out? Did that piss you off? Maybe enough to make you see how ludicrous such a distinction is and make you think past manufactured differences in society?
Your attempt to divide citizens into "those" people, unless you are a multi-millionaire of an old money family(read The Great Gatsby if you want to know why the difference between old and new money matters) is misdirected. Leave the made up demographics and social strata out of it and let's focus on the issue at hand,without attempting to divide us into more easily conquered, smaller groups. we are ALL citizens, ALL in this together. My Oath that I swore covers YOU as well, and I guarantee you if I saw you needing help I would give it, REGARDLESS if the person attacking you had a badge or not. To fail to do so would be wrong.
I guarantee you that good ol' mikey there has heard of, seen, or looked the other way while someone in his department violated the law, and he didn't turn them in for fear of being a "rat" like this is high school and he wants to be part of the "cool kids". Or to be fair, maybe he was worried for his safety and reprisals, in which case why in God's name would you want someone who would threaten or carry out threats to whistleblowers to continue to have arrest powers and the approval of the state? Only mikey knows for certain, just as I know he will NEVER admit to looking the other way, just trot out that "few bad apples" cliche'. As long as there are cops who look the other way because the criminal performing the heinous act happens to wear a badge, then there ARE NO GOOD COPS, period, end of story. DO NOT tell me it is impossible to have a non-corrupt police force if, as cops claim that the "good" cops far outnumber the "few bad apples" and EVERYONE has arrest powers. If that was the case then people who would be "bad" cops would find another line of work. But they don't arrest their "brothers" in public after they have obviously violated citizen's rights, gotta present that united front, right? Well, how's that starting to work out for them?
Hate to tell you, but more and more in Free States it IS the prevailing custom to carry a weapon. I do, every single day, and I fully accept the lifestyle alterations and added responsibilities that entails. I am not Johnny Rambo, I hope that no-one on a daily basis even knows that I carry, one because it is not their business, and two, any overzealous cop called by a sheep will cause difficulties in my life, for the simple fact I do not deal with the new generation of "farvas" particularly well, all the police I know that actually agree with my views are getting retired. Old school cops and deputies who know how to TALK to people, and defuse situations with eloquence and common sense, instead of the new standard, which appears to be who can hold the department "Tazer quick draw champion" trophy the longest. And since I am FAR more concerned with potential harm befalling me around new school cops than any criminal I might meet, I am NOT inclined to disarm around them "for officer's safety" thus placing me at their "mercy". So staying under the radar is to my advantage, mainly to avoid the "alpha male and gotta prove it" attitude that many new generation cops display(see mikey's avatar if my point needs to be proven).
When I see in equal number, video showing cops AT ONCE and PUBLICLY arrest cops that go over the line, cops that stand up for the Constitution, and cops that place their sacred Oath above "department policy" or smart career choices, to video that documents cops acting like terrorists, then I will PUBLICLY AND LOUDLY change my views concerning them.
I am not here to argue, or to engage in immature pissing contests as I have seen in other threads. Truth is Truth, and cannot be argued against, only attempted to be gotten around by people with an agenda.
A citizen has the right to defend his property and his life, against ANYONE trying to take either, and that is TRUTH.
You WILL lose your life someday. You will NEVER lose your Liberty unless you ALLOW someone to take it from you, and that is TRUTH.
BOOM GOES THE HAMMAedit on Wed17389Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:17:38 -0600u1130WednesdayAmerica/Chicago by DisgruntledPatriot because: additional clarification