It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
intrptr
reply to post by Soloprotocol
You mean this one?
Soloprotocol
intrptr
reply to post by Soloprotocol
You mean this one?
Yeah that's the one...Strange request, anyone know the name of the SS agent who called them off. ?
JohnnySasaki
leostokes
reply to post by FlyersFan
I'm not seeing a bullet wound. That's all ....
No, I am not seeing a bullet wound either. The point is that the human eye is not as sensitive as digital computer analysis.
Do you see the folds of skin in JFK's neck? They mask an exit wound. The people who authorized the photo are deliberately hiding this exit wound in the neck folds. Also they have pulled his scalp over the massive exit wound in the back of JFK's head. It looks like normal hair. But we know there is a baseball size hole under the scalp. Don't we?
You might think you know that, but I have yet to see any proof of that. In fact, everything points to the contrary. All I have seen in this thread is a bunch of photo's of people pointing to the back of their head (which could very easily be taken out of context without the video and audio along with it. Meaning they could be describing the entry wound just as much as the exit wound), and a drawing that could have been made by anyone.
That's not exactly what I call proof.
FlyersFan
reply to post by leostokes
Okay .. digital photo analysis. I"m just saying that they look like medium sized moles to me.
I'm not seeing a bullet wound. That's all ....