It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Helious
reply to post by bigfootgurl
I think that If I am going to present a video that covers all of the relevant points and only the points that I feel have the amount of provable evidence to support them, I will probably have to make it myself and that is something I am considering seriously.
OneFreeMan
These are all just words. Not one photograph of the successful businessman
to be found anywhere in any of the articles you posted.
Helious
reply to post by bigfootgurl
Thank you for the kind words. I have researched this subject like no other in my 37 years on Earth and it is disturbing to me on every level. I have an unparalleled amount of passion in wanting to get to the bottom of the inconsistencies but I think that If I am going to present a video that covers all of the relevant points and only the points that I feel have the amount of provable evidence to support them, I will probably have to make it myself and that is something I am considering seriously.
I won't go into any of that here because as you already know, discussion off topic on this subject is likely to jeopardize the whole thread. A thread I very much appreciate you creating.edit on 17-11-2013 by Helious because: (no reason given)
bigfootgurl
The video features some information I've never heard before.
JuniorDisco
reply to post by jaws1975
The media showed those because, rightly or wrongly, it was felt that by doing so they might spur some action and prevent another gassing.
On the other hand there was significant doubt that showing Adam Lanza's victims was going to stop Adam Lanza killing more kids.
It's pretty simple.
DelMarvel
Most of these Sandy Hook conspiracies would have to involve thousands of people including teachers, school employees, funeral home directors and employees, the doctors who conducted the autopsies, emergency responders, law enforcement from multiple jurisdictions, 600 sets of parents, some portion of the global media and the friends and family of all the above.
It's ludicrous. It's all been completely debunked long ago. The sane people have simply given up arguing this one.
The use of exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech. It may be used to evoke strong feelings or to create a strong impression, but is not meant to be taken literally.
olaru12
reply to post by DelMarvel
Whoa...
You have been here quite awhile! How did you miss this?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the "How dare you!" gambit.