It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
teachtaire
reply to post by Aazadan
I think many people are worried about the "NWO" when we still have the OWO in power.
GargIndia
reply to post by BO XIAN
I think no nation should be threatening other with nuclear weapons.
This applies to USA also.
We are genuinely worried at these reports in the Chinese media.
Such stance will only increase militarization of society and will eventually lead to war.
BO XIAN
reply to post by BO XIAN
I think no nation should be threatening other with nuclear weapons.
This applies to USA also.
We are genuinely worried at these reports in the Chinese media.
Such stance will only increase militarization of society and will eventually lead to war.
However, the globalist oligarchy is determined to try and genocidally murder all but 200 million global citizens.
Thankfully, the God of The Bible indicates they'll "only" end up with about half the then current population murdered in this END TIMES era.
That's a mind-boggling amount of blood.
I have loved ones in India and many in China.
Thanks for your kind reply.
Phoenix
Guess General Curtis Lemay needs resurrection as he was better with the "send em back to the stone age" plans and commentary.
China has same problem USSR had, how to take out all enemy strategic forces in one strike or suffer retaliatory strikes.
Namely SLBM's
. Worldwide Effects of Fallout
Much of our knowledge of the production and distribution of radionuclides has been derived from the period of intensive nuclear testing in the atmosphere during the 1950's and early 1960's. It is estimated that more than 500 megatons of nuclear yield were detonated in the atmosphere between 1945 and 1971, about half of this yield being produced by a fission reaction. The peak occurred in 1961-62, when a total of 340 megatons were detonated in the atmosphere by the United States and Soviet Union. The limited nuclear test ban treaty of 1963 ended atmospheric testing for the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union, but two major non-signatories, France and China, continued nuclear testing at the rate of about 5 megatons annually. (France now conducts its nuclear tests underground.)
A U.N. scientific committee has estimated that the cumulative per capita dose to the world's population up to the year 2000 as a result of atmospheric testing through 1970 (cutoff date of the study) will be the equivalent of 2 years' exposure to natural background radiation on the earth's surface. For the bulk of the world's population, internal and external radiation doses of natural origin amount to less than one-tenth rad annually. Thus nuclear testing to date does not appear to pose a severe radiation threat in global terms. But a nuclear war releasing 10 or 100 times the total yield of all previous weapons tests could pose a far greater worldwide threat. The biological effects of all forms of ionizing radiation have been calculated within broad ranges by the National Academy of Sciences. Based on these calculations, fallout from the 500-plus megatons of nuclear testing through 1970 will produce between 2 and 25 cases of genetic disease per million live births in the next generation.
This means that between 3 and 50 persons per billion births in the post-testing generation will have genetic damage for each megaton of nuclear yield exploded. With similar uncertainty, it is possible to estimate that the induction of cancers would range from 75 to 300 cases per megaton for each billion people in the post-test generation.
If we apply these very rough yardsticks to a large-scale nuclear war in which 10,000 megatons of nuclear force are detonated, the effects on a world population of 5 billion appear enormous. Allowing for uncertainties about the dynamics of a possible nuclear war, radiation-induced cancers and genetic damage together over 30 years are estimated to range from 1.5 to 30 million for the world population as a whole. This would mean one additional case for every 100 to 3,000 people or about 1/2 percent to 15 percent of the estimated peacetime cancer death rate in developed countries. As will be seen, moreover, there could be other, less well understood effects which would drastically increase suffering and death.