It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
reply to post by grey580
By 2018 my right unmentionable. I'm willing to put money it's flying right now and has been for years. Which means it's going to have an incredibly successful and fast test program.
See this thread for more
originally posted by: mightmight
a reply to: Soloprotocol
A high speed recon capability is useful since satellites are very predictable in their orbits and take lots of time to get over the same target area again. You can plan around that.
Of course you can built satellites with maneuvering capability but since you can refuel them their endurance is rather limited and once you get spotted in another orbit you're back to square one. You can try to make satellites stealthy but this is rather difficult, costly and you'd never know if it really works against near peer opponents.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
Could the X 37 not do those things you mention,...with a bit of tweeking here and there. 37,000 Kpm is not to be sniffed at.
originally posted by: mightmight
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
Could the X 37 not do those things you mention,...with a bit of tweeking here and there. 37,000 Kpm is not to be sniffed at.
The only difference between a satellite and the X-37B in LEO is the return capability of the X-37B. If you want to generate delta v and achieve a different orbit you need an engine consuming fuel. The X-37B is cabable of modest orbit changes (as has been observed in the past) but likely has only a very limited fuel supply.
The X-37B is probably less suited for this than certain satellites which carry much more fuel. And the X-37b can be track as well as anything upthere. Private spotters are one thing but you can eb sure that russian and chinese space surveillance routinely tracks every move that thing makes.