It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TOKYO (AP) — Japanese regulators on Wednesday gave final approval for the removal of fuel rods from an uncontained cooling pool at a damaged reactor building considered the highest risk at a crippled nuclear plant.
Removing the fuel rods from the Unit 4 cooling pool is the first major step in a decommissioning process that is expected to last decades at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, where three reactors melted down after the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.
The Nuclear Regulation Authority said at its weekly meeting that the proposal by the plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co., is appropriate and that the removal can start in November as planned.
As the world continues to gaze with concern at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant, hi-tech security cameras installed by an Israeli defense firm are recording events at the troubled core from an insider’s vantage point.
The Arava-based Magna BSP company, which specializes in producing and installing stereoscopic sensory and thermal imaging cameras, had been contracted to place cameras around one of the plant’s six cores – the core that has been experiencing explosions and overheating.
Speaking to The Jerusalem Post on Monday, Magna’s head, Haim Siboni, said the thermal cameras also had the ability to detect the presence of radioactive clouds in the air, but added that Magna had not been able to gain access to the images recorded by the cameras at this time.
“Because we are using these special cameras, we can also identify radioactive clouds, due to the spectrum that our cameras can sense,” Siboni said.
Although Magna is able to gain remote access to its computer system, which receives the cameras’ images, Siboni said his company had not yet been authorized to do so.
“We have not been allowed to take control remotely yet,” Siboni said.
There is enough explosive power dangling at Fukushima to equal 14,000 Hiroshima's. It's time to tune in to this disaster being artfully hidden from the world.
TEPCO's track record makes any removal concerning. And their history of covering up the scope of the disaster makes one ask, "Will we even know or will the fact that their radiation fire can be hidden be their salvation and the world's demise?"
I'm wondering why the picture in OP is primarily GREEN
Cherenkov Radiation glow in nuclear reactors is BLUE:
Since when did the UN become so whipped?
The day that radiation left Japan's shores is the day they lost the right to exclusively oversee this operation…and yet Japan and TEPCO are still dictating the rules???
As the operations to remove fuel rods proceeds, what do you think the conditions of them will be? Following the early seawater cooling and all that has happened since, what risks will be present in these rod conditions? How would they go about removing damaged rods?
JohnPhoenix
" There is enough explosive power dangling at Fukushima to equal 14,000 Hiroshimas. "
Er.. How likely is this to actually happen.. could japan go Boom to that tune? How remotely possible is this.. and whats the fallout going to be like..
forget global warming, that could destroy the planet.. I'm sure they got Nukes in Japan too you know just like we do and everyone else does.. could they also get triggered?
BobAthome
reply to post by BobAthome
whatever it is, its glowing,, and seems too effect the particle electrons on the cam screen. yes its possible.
AliceBleachWhite
I'm wondering why the picture in OP is primarily GREEN
Cherenkov Radiation glow in nuclear reactors is BLUE:
Makes me wonder about the rest of the validity of the article.
EDIT: Additionally, all this rhetoric about the biggest threat the world has ever known is a bit over the top. Sure it's a disaster and indeed serious, but, in terms of nuclear contamination, we've detonated 2053 BOMBS on the planet Many of them MEGATON range compared to Hiroshima's tiny Kiloton explosion -
edit on 10/30/2013 by AliceBleachWhite because: (no reason given)