It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Another common apologetic is that “the world is filled with unsavory characters, and we must deal with them if we are to protect American interests at all.” There are two things wrong with this. First, it ignores the fact that the CIA has regularly spurned alliances with defenders of democracy, free speech and human rights, preferring the company of military dictators and tyrants. The CIA had moral options available to them, but did not take them.
Second, this argument begs several questions. The first is: “Which American interests?” The CIA has courted right-wing dictators because they allow wealthy Americans to exploit the country’s cheap labor and resources. But poor and middle-class Americans pay the price whenever they fight the wars that stem from CIA actions, from Vietnam to the Gulf War to Panama. The second begged question is: “Why should American interests come at the expense of other peoples’ human rights?”
Spookybelle
And I highly doubt that the CIA has an ongoing policy of child molestation, its stuff like that which ruins threads and robs them of any legitimacy.
Spookybelle
reply to post by Eryiedes
Are you suggesting we get rid of the CIA?
They do perform a necessary function and at times must do illegal things. Its the game they play and they do not have the benefit of making the rules.
Certainly they may cross the line in many instances but are you sure that is not necessary? Without you being privy to all their planning how do you know?
And I highly doubt that the CIA has an ongoing policy of child molestation, its stuff like that which ruins threads and robs them of any legitimacy.
Spookybelle
reply to post by Eryiedes
Ok, please explain to me what benefit the CIA derives from molesting children then.
If you contend that it is an ongoing policy of theirs, the molestation of children, why do they do that?
Are they trying to pry information out of the kids?
Are they trying to brainwash them?
Please enlighten us as to why the CIA wishes to molest children.
Spookybelle
reply to post by benrl
Actually how about you address the question I asked and not attempt to dodge it?
After that, I will be more than happy to address your second point.
benrl
Spookybelle
reply to post by benrl
Actually how about you address the question I asked and not attempt to dodge it?
After that, I will be more than happy to address your second point.
Fine, the same reasons the CIA smuggled drugs in Vietnam through Air America.
There was profit to be had.
Frankly drug smuggling is as bad as human trafficking, but I am sure you will come up with a justification for it.
EA006
reply to post by Eryiedes
You should have a look at the book 'Legacy of Ashes'. It describes the activities of the CIA and outlines the amount of blood and treasure they have wasted.
Interesting read.
Eryiedes
reply to post by Spookybelle
Morning,
You answers lie in the fact that human trafficking is a multi-billion dollar industry.
The victems are usually female and a typical sex slave can make their "pimp" $250K USD a year.
You think they need more of an excuse than that?
Would you not define that as "profit"?
-Amitaba-edit on 28-10-2013 by Eryiedes because: Typo
Spookybelle
reply to post by Eryiedes
Ok, please explain to me what benefit the CIA derives from molesting children then.
If you contend that it is an ongoing policy of theirs, the molestation of children, why do they do that?
Are they trying to pry information out of the kids?
Are they trying to brainwash them?
Please enlighten us as to why the CIA wishes to molest children.
www.corpwatch.org...
Dolan says, "It's not just Americans who are participating in these illegal acts.
But what makes this more egregious for the U.S. is that our purpose in those
regions is to restore some sense of civility. Now you've got employees of U.S.
contractors in bed with the local mafia and buying kids for sex! That these
guys have some kind of immunity from prosecution is morally outrageous. How can men be allowed to get away with rape simply because of location? Rape is a crime no matter where it occurs and it's important to remember that even prostitution is against the law in Bosnia. The message we're sending to kids is that it's okay for America's representatives to rape children. We talk about the future of the children, helping to build economies, democracy, the rule of law, and at the same time we fail to prosecute cases like this. That is immoral and hypocritical, and if DynCorp is involved in this in any way it should forfeit its contract and pay restitution in the form of training about trafficking."
Part I
This is the story of how the CIA uses "war zones" to garner kids for the sex slave business. You may have heard how the two companies, DynCorp and Halliburton, were caught trafficking in women during the war in Yugoslavia.
Some background on this topic can be found at Dyncorp and Halliburton Sex Slave Scandal Won't Go Away
Please see the Rep. Cynthia McKinney Grills Rumsfeld On Dyncorp Sex Rings video.
Spookybelle
However, if that is how you are using this relationship then I will ask you if you believe the CIA should not operate that way.
The CIA is not a law enforcement agency and they operate with the worst of the bad, oftentimes to reach a larger goal. Does this mean they must break the law and do things inhumane?
Yes it does, it is the world in which they operate. You cannot play with the bad guys by being a good guy so I'm asking if you think this is necessary or not.
If not then why even bother having a CIA
Does the CIA allow many horrible things to happen, even partake in it?
Probably, but is it necessary to accomplish their larger goal?
I think so. Its what they were designed to do.
They were designed to operate outside the law.
727Sky
Sex can be used to bribe and say thank you for a job well done.... or as something to hang over one's head if they are threatened with exposure as a front page news article in their home country.