PDF on The Vimanika Shastra FREE TO VIEW VERY RARE!!!

breadinspector
youre very close minded mate
en.wikipedia.org...

there's nothing in there about the existence of the text 15 years befoer it is known to have been written.

Shāstry was the author of the Vaimānika Shāstra, Talpade is supposed to have constructed Marutsakhā under the guidance of Pandit Subbarāya Shāstry.

which isn't the same thing at all - the claim was the information was given to the Wright Brothers - and the question is - HOW?

there's no evidence that Shastry travelled to the US is there? Or he had any disciples that also knew it all off by heart and went to the US?? Or the Wright brothers visited him?

The text existed perhaps as early as 1918 - no-one is claiming it existed earlier. So how did the Wright Brothers get to know all about it 15 years before then?

the indian institue says its all not possible but its been done and top of that the indian institue has been infilitrated by western ideology which makes it a conflict of interest

no it isn't.

Aloysius the Gaul

breadinspector
youre very close minded mate
en.wikipedia.org...

there's nothing in there about the existence of the text 15 years befoer it is known to have been written.

Shāstry was the author of the Vaimānika Shāstra, Talpade is supposed to have constructed Marutsakhā under the guidance of Pandit Subbarāya Shāstry.

which isn't the same thing at all - the claim was the information was given to the Wright Brothers - and the question is - HOW?

there's no evidence that Shastry travelled to the US is there? Or he had any disciples that also knew it all off by heart and went to the US?? Or the Wright brothers visited him?

The text existed perhaps as early as 1918 - no-one is claiming it existed earlier. So how did the Wright Brothers get to know all about it 15 years before then?

the indian institue says its all not possible but its been done and top of that the indian institue has been infilitrated by western ideology which makes it a conflict of interest

no it isn't.

it is a conflict of interest mate
the aircraft was constructed 15 years before the book came out the british sent the plane to the wright brothers in america, the wright brothers are of british descent

shastry told the 2 scientists orally how to build the plane and they built it in 1895 the plane was confiscated by the british and it was sent to the wright brothers

NEW LIGHT ON THE VIMANIKA SHASTRA

Later in September 1952 another article which received wide attention is the reported successful experimental flight of MARUTSAKHA Vimana by Shivkar Bapuji Talphade in the year 1895 on the Chowpatty beach in the Vande Matram a Gujarati Daily

Shivkar Bapuji Talphade: The current story regarding Shivkar Bapuji Talphade is that he successfully flew an unmanned plane named Marut Sakha in the year 1895 in Mumbai on basis of his study of Rigveda Richas and the commentary of Maharishi Bharadwaja thereof

In the year 1895, he prepared an airplane named Marut Sakha based on Bharadwaja’s work on this subject, and demonstrated that it could reach nearly to an height of 1500 ft. in the presence of the Great Sayaji Rao Gaikwad, the then Ruler of Baroda, the late Justice M.G. Ranade and Late Lalji Narayanji a prominent merchant of Mumbai .They were very pleased with the equipment and gave reward to the inventor

Some how the british got a hold of the plane and sent it to the wright brothers in the usa

Sri Sastry was prevailed upon by Sri Puttanna Chetty , who was an ardent admirer of Sri Sastry , to produce blue prints of the Vimanas he was talking about and he did with few notes. When Lord (then Mr.) Montague visited India in about 1918, this subject was put before the Government in Bombay by a Parsi gentlemam with the result Sri Sastry was put under arrest and only influence with the highest level could save him from further prosecution. Naturally from that time onwards ,caution made him talk that he was only a theorist.

breadinspector
it is a conflict of interest mate

\

no it isn't...."mate"

the aircraft was constructed 15 years before the book came out the british sent the plane to the wright brothers in america, the wright brothers are of british descent

You missed out "allegedly" or "supposedly" between "was" and "constructed".

shastry told the 2 scientists orally how to build the plane and they built it in 1895 the plane was confiscated by the british and it was sent to the wright brothers

for which there is not one skerrick of verifiable evidence.


so - as the saying goes, that which is asserted without evidence may also be dismissed without evidence.

Hence: no it wasn't.

Glad to have sorted that out for you

Aloysius the Gaul

breadinspector
it is a conflict of interest mate

\

no it isn't...."mate"

the aircraft was constructed 15 years before the book came out the british sent the plane to the wright brothers in america, the wright brothers are of british descent

You missed out "allegedly" or "supposedly" between "was" and "constructed".

shastry told the 2 scientists orally how to build the plane and they built it in 1895 the plane was confiscated by the british and it was sent to the wright brothers

for which there is not one skerrick of verifiable evidence.


so - as the saying goes, that which is asserted without evidence may also be dismissed without evidence.

Hence: no it wasn't.

Glad to have sorted that out for you

you must be a disinfo agent mate cant hack another culture out doing yours the evidence is there u just choose not to believe it u havent sorted anything out but keep telllng your self that whatever helps you sleep at night mate

breadinspector
the university says the plane couldnt work because western ideology has hijacked the indian uni mate
the plane was real and youre trying to discredit it using semantics, it doesnt matter if he was a nationalist because its true mate

No, i'm examining the evidence and reading the source that you provided accurately. You could learn a lot from such a process, but you are too hampered by gullibility and an inability to understand basic words from your own source.

Just wow.

I really would recommend that you go tho the source of these stories and read Hindu literature translated by a credible scholar - you will find it quite enlightening, and not just in that it may release you from the cycle of birth and death lol

ETA: i quote you from the top of this page:

shastry told the 2 scientists orally how to build the plane and they built it in 1895 the plane was confiscated by the british and it was sent to the wright brothers

So firstly instructions on how to build this supposed plane were given in a conversation. Thats a big stretch.

But think about it, why the blooming heck would the brits send the beyond revolutionary world changing invention to two private individuals in a foreign country who were a rival for world power, rather than keeping the tech for them selves if they are so jealous of some Indians having it due to the British powers recognising it's value?
The Empire would never have fallen and they would have had a remarkable advantage over all other nations in trade, transport and warfare.

Just listen to yourself.

Your own sources refute your claims.

But then again, i read in another of your threads that you believe Reptilians put a curse on you, or a piece of your jewelery.

Goodbye

As a western superiority obsessed disinfo agent, who also reads vedic literature (note my sarcasm), i did a quick search for the Vimanika Shastra which i have read before to post some of the hilarious pics of aircraft therein - doing so because i could not get the OP link to work.

I came across this gem whilst doing so and it is really worth a share:

A CRITICAL STUDY OF THE WORK VYMANIKA SHASTRA

By H.S. MUKUNDA§, S.M. DESHPANDE§, H.R. NAGENDRA§§,
A. PRABHU§, AND S.P. GOVINDARAJU§
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore‐560012 (Karnataka)

It is well worth a read. One particularly pertinent extract relates to the quality of Sanskrit it uses - Sanskrit is noted for it's complex idiom and grammar, which takes years of dedication to learn and the use of which reveals much about who wrote it. The report concludes

a few words did have a structure
similar to that of the Vedic Sanskrit.
The number of such words being
very small, and their usage being
incidental, it appears appropriate
to conclude that the Sanskrit used
in the text is modern

And just so people can hear from someone other than me that self powered flying machines (ie: containing an engine and replicable, as opposed to a holy person powering flight through the use of ascetic practice to gain magical powers) are not a part of Hindu Myth:

The most important of texts like
Ramayana and Mahabharata make
no mention of the use of aircraft
for travel, military, or war
purposes. The ‘Pushpak Vimana’
of Ramayana, as described
therein, has no flying qualities
except possibly by invocation of
‘mantras’ or ‘tantras’.

People here also often reference the Brihatkatha as talking of powered Vimana (which translates as "Palace" in Sanskrit) flying in the air, so just to head that one off, the Brihatkatha has no extant copies what so ever so the people who claim this are less than honest. The Kathasaritsagara of Somadeva is generally accepted as having the best remains of this ancient text contained within it's pages - i've read this book a great many times and have a copy on my desk right now. None of this is present, and it is the best source.

The Panchatantra of Visnu Sarma also contains traces of the Brihatkatha. On my desk too

Hit the books dude, find out for yourself.

wikipedia is wrong
In 1875, the Vymaanika-Shaastra, a fourth century BC text written by Maharshi Bhardwaj, was discovered in a temple in India. The book dealt with the operation of ancient vimanas and included information on steering, precautions for long flights, protection of the airships from storms and lightning, and how to switch the drive to solar energy, or some other “free energy” source, possibly some sort of “gravity drive.”

according to www.bibliotecapleyades.net... which is a much better source to go on, so by going by these facts we can distinguish that the first plane was really developed by the 2 scientists before the wright brothers recieved the instructions from the british to build a copy of the indians plane

breadinspector
this is were the wright brothers got the insructions to build their aircraft from when india was a colony they werent allowed science advances and the british took control of it and sent it to america to the wright brothers.

The Wright brothers based their aircraft mainly on the works of George Cayley and Octave Chanute. Their first glider was based on the Chanute-Herring biplane. They built the first known wind tunnel to prefect the shape of airfoils for both wings and propellers. None of their work was based on anything from India.

breadinspector
wikipedia is wrong

So go correct it.

In 1875, the Vymaanika-Shaastra, a fourth century BC text written by Maharshi Bhardwaj, was discovered in a temple in India.

And yet it has never been seen....

Got any evidnce for this?

according to www.bibliotecapleyades.net... which is a much better source to go on

Better because why?

, so by going by these facts

"story" is not spelled f a c t s

The source of that is given as "Technology of the Gods - The Incredible Sciences of the Ancients" - written by David Hatcher Childress and currently available on Amazon.

David Hatcher Childress is a hack writer of "Ancheint alien", alternative history, revisionist history and unexplained phenomena.

He is no more a "better source" than Conservapedia!

"we can distinguish that the first plane was really developed by the 2 scientists before the wright brothers recieved the instructions from the british to build a copy of the indians plane

No - we can distinguish a story that someone makes a good living out of.