It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Arbitrageur
reply to post by InTheLight
That is not free in so many ways.
First, you have to own that generator setup, and that's not free.
"It's inexpensive if you DIY with used equipment."
Second, for every 250W of power you produce, you have to consume additional food with considerably more potential energy because of the body's inefficiency in converting food to mechanical motion.
"The OP has to eat in any event.
Third, there is the opportunity cost. While you're pedaling the bike, you're not out making house calls fixing PC problems for $40 an hour or whatever you do for a living, and you can buy a lot of electricity with that $40, probably more than you could generate with an entire week of cycling.
"Here's a DIY video with little effort for little wattage, which is what the OP is looking for now."
Fourth, have you ever actually tried to generate 250 watts that way? I have. It is really a lot harder than it looks, and most people would be exhausted after a few minutes. You could always get a horse and the horse can generate 746 Watts (that's 1 horsepower by definition), but the horse eats like a horse, and feeding it isn't free, not to mention the required investment in a super dooper pooper scooper to clean up your yard of the mess, a task which probably isn't that much fun.
What? No pitch for Rossi's eCat? Or have you given up on that by now? Sorry, I couldn't resist.
pteridine
reply to post by cavedweller88
If you do a cost benefit analysis, you will discover that for the small amount of power that you need, it is most cost effective to buy the power from the grid.
But joking aside, yes, I think that analysis is most probably the correct one, once the analysis is done correctly. For the other options you not only have to amortize capital costs, but have to consider maintenance costs and other factors (like you could have invested the money instead, so you're losing those investment profits).
So one way to think of "Free Energy" is the new term for "Perpetual motion", just like the term "LENR" has replaced "cold fusion" for the most part.
When asked about the conservation of energy Mr McCarthy says quite frankly that he does not know where the energy that provides perpetual motion comes from.
Arbitrageur
reply to post by InTheLight
Did you notice in the middle he asks if the rider could do that for an extended duration, and the rider answers "no..."?
Also unlike the other video, we don't know how much power they are producing...they would have to measure amps as well as volts to tell us that.