House Stenographer Appears to Get Hypnotized Before 'Freemason' Rant

Great post.
how did ATS miss it! and Not delete it.

Them! are getting sloppy.
letting this happen.
it is so easy to see this is a set up.

reply to post by PhoenixOD


If as you say she had been preparing what she said for weeks (which is speculative on your part), then how come her husband claims she has no memory of what she said at the podium? Surely anybody who has prepared a speech would remember what they were going to say, especially according to her husband she remembered what she said at the elevator but NOT at the podium.

With all due respect, the majority of contributors on this thread are trying to evaluate and research information they are being presented with, all I see from your posts is that we are not listening to the message she was trying to impart. As I said in one of my previous posts, what she had to say is not the reason I started this thread, but why would the media present what she said in such a deceitful manner? Why would an apparently intelligent woman with such a responsible job chose to behave outside the protocols? By any stretch of the imagination her behaviour is well out of the norm.

I think the link between masons and the American constitution has been already covered in this thread and anybody who has looked into the background of the forefathers who wrote it generally accept they were masons. Done and dusted.

This is not a religious thread.

So please, as this is my thread, I politely request that if you want to bring in the 'God moment', please go and start your own thread so that it can be discussed there.

Rainbows
Jane

reply to post by angelchemuel

This is not a religious thread.

So please, as this is my thread, I politely request that if you want to bring in the 'God moment', please go and start your own thread so that it can be discussed there.

What a strange thing to say ,please show me where i have mentioned God in any of my posts in this thread.

Rezlooper
It's only in recent years when liberal madness has tried to change the document all in the name of "progressive change for the better" that things have gone wrong!

Yeah that's right, conservatives have nothing to be ashamed of!

Conservatives never had people in office that made things worst for the American people.

Of course not!

PhoenixOD
reply to post by angelchemuel

 

So please, as this is my thread, I politely request that if you want to bring in the 'God moment', please go and start your own thread so that it can be discussed there.

What a strange thing to say ,please show me where i have mentioned God in any of my posts in this thread.

edit on 21-10-2013 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)

She may have been referring to some of my posts there.. I have brought that "moment" up a few times based on the things her husband has said about it. Woops.

reply to post by angelchemuel


I heard this on the news before and she mention something like "devil and masons" I couldn't make it out. Someone mention that she said Balphamet. Don't know how to spelling it but it's the goat god. It was nothing like the one dubbed over.

THIS IS BANANAS.. B-A-N-A-N-A-S

Always follow the white haired guy, he looked way too calm for a person snapping off in the countries capitol. Follow him and you will get your answers...

This was staged or our little friend MK Ultra decided to come back to say hello...

reply to post by angelchemuel

If as you say she had been preparing what she said for weeks (which is speculative on your part), then how come her husband claims she has no memory of what she said at the podium? Surely anybody who has prepared a speech would remember what they were going to say, especially according to her husband she remembered what she said at the elevator but NOT at the podium.

Yes we are all speculating on what has happened here. That is the whole point of the thread is it not?

Even if she cant remember what she said at the podium that does not mean it cant have been the same thing she was saying as she was being pushed into the elevator.

reply to post by angelchemuel


jumping right into conjecturing about possible, and unprovable, hypnosis deflects from the entirely PROVABLE and in your face DUBBING of the video being put out by the msm.
that is the point that should be driven home: MSM CAUGHT LYING AND FABRICATING EVIDENCE....AGAIN

Rezlooper
It's only in recent years when liberal madness has tried to change the document all in the name of "progressive change for the better" that things have gone wrong!

On second thought...

It's easier to fool a liberal with a logical lie than a conservative

"If it ain't good for me directly, I don't want anything of it and I certainly don't want to pay for it especially if it would help other people I don't know."

-A conservative

So it's much harder to fool conservative than liberals into changing for the best as a society because they really don't give a damn about others, hell, they can work just like I did! ...

Liberals can be more easily fooled with positive ideas like universal socialized health care.

I am a liberal but, I can extrapolate that liberal ideas make it easier to have centralized crooks running the whole deal.

Maybe changing everyone into a liberal is liked to MK Ultra too!

tport17
Here is a quote from the woman about why she decided to do this.

“For the past 2 and 1/2 weeks, the Holy Spirit has been waking me up in the middle of the night and preparing me (through my reluctance and doubt) to deliver a message in the House Chamber,” stenographer Dianne Foster Reidy told Fox News’s Chad Pergram in a written statement. “That is what I did last night.”

Link

Interesting quote to go along with the hypnosis theory, though I am not sure this is what was happening.

this is so textbook mkultra. they cover the memories of what actually happened (programming) with the fuzzy memories of a divine encounter that tells her to do what they want her to do.

i would have to guess the message is not for the public but probably directed at somebody or some group in the house. the dubbed sounds were there to cover what she actually said, so that no one could on the off chance use high tech audio analyzing equipment to pull out the faint sounds of the actual microphone dialogue.

PhoenixOD
reply to post by angelchemuel

 

If as you say she had been preparing what she said for weeks (which is speculative on your part), then how come her husband claims she has no memory of what she said at the podium? Surely anybody who has prepared a speech would remember what they were going to say, especially according to her husband she remembered what she said at the elevator but NOT at the podium.

Yes we are all speculating on what has happened here. That is the whole point of the thread is it not?

Even if she cant remember what she said at the podium that does not mean it cant have been the same thing she was saying as she was being pushed into the elevator.

No we are all not speculating at all. There is a consensus that we need to know somehow what she said at the podium.

At the risk of sounding like a parrot, the point of starting this thread was as I said in my previous post.

Now added to the mix we are informed by her husband that she cannot remember what she said at the podium, which in of itself tells us that any sane, logical, sensible, and intelligent person would remember what they said. So by his own admission he is condemning his wife to be regarded as somebody who at the very best suffered a moment of temporary insanity........which then follows that whatever she said would be regarded as the rantings of an unstable mind.

Rainbows
Jane

The adding of the audio from a separate scene does not surprise me, manipulating media!

robobbob
reply to post by angelchemuel

 

jumping right into conjecturing about possible, and unprovable, hypnosis deflects from the entirely PROVABLE and in your face DUBBING of the video being put out by the msm.
that is the point that should be driven home: MSM CAUGHT LYING AND FABRICATING EVIDENCE....AGAIN

I answer you with what I said in my OP

What this video does show however is how the media manipulates its presentation.

Rainbows
Jane

Mind Control is used in almost every aspect of the government. They mastered the techniques during the Holocaust and brought all the top scientists over along with them. It wouldn't surprise me if that was her handler and he triggered her to say what she did.

“For the past 2 and 1/2 weeks, the Holy Spirit has been waking me up in the middle of the night and preparing me (through my reluctance and doubt) to deliver a message in the House Chamber,” stenographer Dianne Foster Reidy told Fox News’s Chad Pergram in a written statement. “That is what I did last night.”

Interesting, so it seems there was a prepared message after all.

The biggest problem i have with the whole MKUltra programmed mind control thing is ..

What would be the motive?

Why would 'they' go to all the trouble and expose a mind control agent just so they can deliver a message abut Freemasons and the formation of America that lasted a few seconds and will be forgotten by next week? A high level political assassination maybe worth it , few a few seconds on the mic saying nothing important in the grand scheme of things? It just wouldn't be worth the time and effort.

Why would anyone hypnotize her or brain wash her for a 30 second rant about Freemasons and god? Could you hypnotize someone that fast or wouldn't they need to have "programed" her in the past?

PhoenixOD

“For the past 2 and 1/2 weeks, the Holy Spirit has been waking me up in the middle of the night and preparing me (through my reluctance and doubt) to deliver a message in the House Chamber,” stenographer Dianne Foster Reidy told Fox News’s Chad Pergram in a written statement. “That is what I did last night.”

Interesting, so it seems there was a prepared message after all.

The biggest problem i have with the whole MKUltra programmed mind control thing is ..

What would be the motive?

Why would 'they' go to all the trouble and expose a mind control agent just so they can deliver a message abut Freemasons and the formation of America that lasted a few seconds and will be forgotten by next week? A high level political assassination maybe worth it , few a few seconds on the mic saying nothing important in the grand scheme of things? It just wouldn't be worth the time and effort.

edit on 21-10-2013 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)

Welcome on board!

Rainbows
Jane

It's late here in the UK.....I have to get some sleep.
Thank you each and every one of you for your contributions.
Please play nicely while I am away.
Rainbows
Jane

reply to post by angelchemuel

No we are all not speculating at all. There is a consensus that we need to know somehow what she said at the podium.

As no one can say what she said at this point then its all speculation.

At the risk of sounding like a parrot, the point of starting this thread was as I said in my previous post.

Now added to the mix we are informed by her husband that she cannot remember what she said at the podium, which in of itself tells us that any sane, logical, sensible, and intelligent person would remember what they said. So by his own admission he is condemning his wife to be regarded as somebody who at the very best suffered a moment of temporary insanity........which then follows that whatever she said would be regarded as the rantings of an unstable mind.

For someone who claims this thread is not about speculation you sure are speculating on a hell of a lot in that quote..