House Stenographer Appears to Get Hypnotized Before 'Freemason' Rant

IrishCream

The rant at the elevator was not prior to the "stage"! The rant at the elevator was a continuation of the rant on the "stage" that was captured by the media's recording devices as security was escorting her off the floor due to her rant.

Ah, thank you for clearing that up.

I did find that even her husband says this was out of character for her,
said she had been waking up at night for weeks with this idea
but was resisting.

Really, who isn't more than just a little nuts down in Washington DC?
Nancy Pelosi seems to have dementia/ early onset alzheimers. Sheila Jackson Lee, same story or she's just running around with an 80 IQ. Janet Napolitano has bats in her belfry. Harry Reid, he's got more than a few screws loose. The black guy who wondered if Guam would sink from being top heavy, again, either an 80 IQ or dementia. Joe Biden... LOL. Eric Holder seems to be on drugs and is just out of it frequently. And Obama is a portrait in somebody whos just not living in the same world as everybody else. A black Mr. Bean with an army of people making sure he doesn't make a fool of himself. And Jesse Jackson, Jr was hauled off in a straightjacket. And the ones who aren't stupid or crazy are completely ethically or morally bankrupt. Diane Feinstein, ahem.
And for every dem I mentioned that's bucking for a section 8, there's a repub who's just as bad. Boehner, Cruz, Mitch McConnell, Bush 43, McCain.
Stupid is the new normal in politics and crazy never goes out of style down there.

While we are all concerned quite rightly about the 'grey' man, I decided to just watch the video of the house floor and concentrate on the stenographer......watch from 5.00 and see how she approaches the mic.....don't tell me that is the behaviour of somebody who is about to go schizo in full public view. Somebody who is going schizo would be looking at their target...the mic....a sane person would be looking at the mic....she doesn't, she's almost 'military. She pauses with her left side to the mic and then 'about turns' to face the mic.

Ugh....this is giving me the creeps.
Rainbows
Jane

I have been reading various threads on this site and others in regards to how she acted prior to and on the way up to the podium. She definitely goes from acting "normal" while speaking with the gray-haired man (not sure who it is but there have been various suggestions), to acting robot-like as she walked to make the speech. It is very eerie to watch.

Not sure if this has been brought up here or if anyone else has seen this mentioned. This is what I find very interesting and has been pointed out by others (I then did a google search out of curiosity to see if it was true). The man who created the audio of her speech is Todd Zwillich (his name connected to the audio is all over the news, on various outlets). He is a Washington Correspondent and has a LinkedIn account where he has his prior education listed:

LinkedIn

This is what is catching everyone's attention:

McGill University BS, Neuroscience Activities and Societies: Multiple memory systems, cognitive neuroscience, spatial memory; McGill Daily, McGill Tribune

Someone on another forum suggested doing a google search for McGill University / MK Ultra and it comes up with an article from McGill Daily:

McGill Daily

I am merely pointing out some interesting information and possible connections. I don't know much about this topic except from what I have read from other postings recently regarding other cases where some have claimed mind control. I just thought I would bring here what I have read elsewhere. I mean really, I would understand Political Science as a major or interest but Neuroscience???

reply to post by CINY8


Wow, I am intrigued by this. Let me say that up until the Aurora shooting and the shooters background did I ever give mind control a serious thought. This is something most people, myself included tend not to touch because we don't want to seem like tin foil hat wearing looney bags. But man... There are just TOO many things going on with the same similarities. What you just posted is another piece added to the mind blowing process.

Interesting idea. . .this makes a good case for potential hypnotism. I guess all that would need to be addressed is what the point for her rant would be. It could have been a dry run for something, or perhaps she actually believes what she's saying.

It would be very neat to know how she arrives at the conclusion that freemasons are evil, if she's not hypnotized, that is.

I've read accounts that so many have attacked FreeMasonry as an evil entity, but I never actually read about how that claim is justified. If anyone has a suggestion on the subject, just let me know.

I found that her husband did a radio interview, here is a news article
on it from Canada Free Press....

Also, here is the conclusion of that article, and you know this is the most
sane thing I have read on it.

Through the various secret and occult societies of man, our nation has been captured from within. It is under the current leadership, however, by both sides of the political aisle, that our nation has been placed on the ultra fast-track of self destruction as we are willingly subjugating ourselves......a One World order and all .......

Let us not forget that during the inauguration of former President George W. Bush on January 20, 2001, he twice made specific references to an angel that “rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm” while facing the Masonic Obelisk we commonly call the Washington Monument. It was exactly thirty-three-(33) weeks later, a number of significance to occult secret societies, that events took place that would change life in America as we know it.

There is more, much more evidence to be offered, but it is this common thread of cryptic and coded messages, word-crafting, subtle yet clear messaging (past and present) that is open to be seen and heard by those with eyes to see and ears to hear, that we are being led into a “new order of the ages.” And this new order is not one inspired by God, but by the angel of darkness.

Last Wednesday, a message was delivered, but how many really heard it?
canadafreepress.com...

Here is the link to TruNews radio interview off of the Trunews Facebook page:
www.facebook.com...

Topic : The guest on today’s edition of TRUNEWS is Dan Reidy. He is the husband of Diane Reidy, the House Stenographer that spoke a prophetic utterance on the floor of the U.S. House following the vote on the debt ceiling

www.trunews.com...

George W.Bush referenced an angel that "rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm"



It is my opinion that a message was delivered indeed by Diane ....
best to take heed to it.

reply to post by Wookiep


It is intriguing and I felt the same way before too - just passed it off as a possibility but this information was easily found and pointed out by multiple other people on other sites. It is almost like they want it to be known that it exists. Especially with all the recent cases of people who have been hearing "voices" beforehand.

A few observations:

First it is obvious they are keeping from the public what she really said. How can we find out what was really said?
Second it appears that Ms. Reidy had rehearsed this. Notice how she stops and looks up at the words YEA, NAY, PRES, and NV. It seems she is trying to tell us something.
Lastly it appears that there is some sort of sleight of hand going on at the elevator scene. Not sure why. Pay attention to what she is wearing.

reply to post by Wookiep


As it is presented in the OP video, the narrator states that the man with the phone ignores her, which he clearly does not do. Human behavior is actually fairly predictable. Probability dictates that his response would be to react and he did. The OP's video claims that he does not and instead, is on his phone. That's a pretty gross misrepresentation.

Glad we agree that he does react.

shouldn't the transcript and videeo of the session be available to the public? How does one go about acquiring this?

shouldn't the transcript and video of the session be available to the public? How does one go about acquiring this?


This tidbit about Bill Young is very dubious. Who was that man? Is Ms. Reidy giving interviews?

reply to post by CINY8


Thank you.........more dots to join up, which they do. Have a star!
Rainbows
Jane

reply to post by burntheships


Not a problem, I thought I should at least let you know the chronological order so you had a better grasp of how it all happened. I am not at all surprised that her and her husband both believe she was being spoken to and instructed by the Holy Spirit... and that the outburst was uncharacteristic of her. There is something more to this event, I won't jump automatically onto the MK Ultra bandwagon, but it does give one pause.

With James Holmes we were also discussing MK Ultra and it's possible use in that case. If it were something of that nature, it was discussed, that "they" need time to weasel their way into the subject's subconscious mind, allowing him to amass the weaponry, plan the attack and even how he surrendered. Then we have Adam Lanza and all that "investigation" entailed. Finally we have Aaron Alexis from the D.C. Navy Yard shooting. Now all of these examples I am using are ones that involved horrific acts that resulted in the loss of innocent lives, that is not where the comparison comes in for use of MK Ultra or some other such mind control/hypnosis, stay with me here...

In the previous three events, there were widespread rumors of 2nd and even 3rd gunmen involved. The stories of accomplices ran for hours while these mystery accomplices were searched for. In fact, recent evidence from the Holmes trial put testimony by an Aurora police officer who questioned Holmes at the scene said that Holmes only smirked when asked if he had an accomplice, even though he readily answered and even expanded on his answers to all other questions. We didn't find out any other details from Lanza or Alexis because they were killed at the scene, Holmes is the only one alive to give us any insight (which I'm sure will be very minimal if any more at all).

So my question, did we finally get video evidence of the "trigger person" using trigger words or body language?! Is that what these other "gunmen" were, trigger re-layers?! If, big IF there were these accomplices, they would have had to spend some time with the perpetrators in order to mold their minds so to speak, giving them a level of comfort around said person. Is that what we're seeing? Someone(s) Diane was familiar with and comfortable enough around to hold this pre-rant conversation?!

Just my thoughts as of right now... I return you to your regularly scheduled thread. Sorry for the slight derailment OP.

reply to post by angelchemuel

This is someone with ignorant views on Freemasonry who abused their position within the government to get 15-minutes of fame to rile up the anti-Mason sentiments and defame an entire group. I'm guessing upon closer evaluation she'll be seen as having some kind of breakdown...maybe a screw loose. Either way, her mental stability seems questionable.

That does look set up. Wow. Nothing new about the BS news manipulation.

I notice that right before she gets up, she looks down and slightly smiles.

Anyone seeing this?

YAY, NAY, PRES, AND NV forms at least 1131 anagrams according to www.wordsmith.org...

I'm thinking it has something to do with Pray. Assuming it is a sort of message hidden in an anagram it would help to know what she said at the podium. Also what did she hand that man? Who was that man? Is the death of Congressman Bill Young related?

reply to post by KSigMason


I am not going to take issue with your reference to the Masons, I don't think it is of any huge importance WHAT the stenographer actually said....maybe that's a Brit thing, I think, and the reason I started this thread is
a) manipulation by the MSM of incidents to suit some political agenda their bosses want us the people to believe.
b) the way this whole incident played out is surreal.
c) why?

Rainbows
Jane

I am considering messaging Michael Aquino to get his take on her behaviour and if it looks MK to him.

KSigMason
reply to post by angelchemuel

 

I'm guessing upon closer evaluation she'll be seen as having some kind of breakdown...maybe a screw loose.

She was released from the evaluation after two hours...

Sure seems the media is the one painting her ...

Why dont you listen to her husband?

Here take a listen, she is glad she did it and feels relieved.