It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MysterX
reply to post by The Great Day
one in our community committed suicide.Very Catholic country and some are thinking God is angry.
Bad news.
Isn't suicide against Catholic doctrine though? If a Catholic thinks God is causing Earthquakes because it's huffy, won't killing yourself make it even more murderous?
Killing yourself AFTER you survive an Earthquake that's killed many others?
Seems...ungrateful somehow.
The depth of the event indicates it ruptured a fault within the crust of the Sunda plate, rather than on the deeper subduction zone plate boundary interface. At the latitude of this earthquake, the Philippine Sea plate moves towards the west-northwest with respect to the Sunda plate at a rate of approximately 10 cm/yr, subducting beneath the Philippine Islands several hundred kilometers to the east of the October 15 earthquake at the Philippine Trench.
TrueAmerican
Well as far as I can tell after reviewing the area geology and aftershock sequence, to me it appears that the 7.1 was a very typical mainshock/aftershock faulting based quake. Yes, it was big, but:
1) The biggest aftershock so far appears to be a 5.9, which leaves an acceptable 1.2 magnitude difference between it and the main 7.1 shock. This is good, in a sense, and indicates loosely that the 7.1 is not likely a foreshock to anything bigger. If we were seeing other 7 range quakes, or even 6.5+'s, I'd be a lot more concerned of an impending disaster.
2) The epicenter appears pretty far removed from the main subduction zone to the east, further suggesting that this may not be related. The depths of the quakes also suggest a non-relation to subductive activity, because that far away from the subduction zone, they would need to be real deep (500 km+) to likely associate the two. So that is also good news, imo.
Given those two things alone, if I were there, I would not be too worried about anything larger for the moment. If you take a look at this map, you can see that it would be very unlikely anyway to get hit by a massive quake. Known historical seismicity in the area doesn't support it:
earthquake.usgs.gov...
Reviewing the USGS summary information here also supports what I am saying:
earthquake.usgs.gov...
The depth of the event indicates it ruptured a fault within the crust of the Sunda plate, rather than on the deeper subduction zone plate boundary interface. At the latitude of this earthquake, the Philippine Sea plate moves towards the west-northwest with respect to the Sunda plate at a rate of approximately 10 cm/yr, subducting beneath the Philippine Islands several hundred kilometers to the east of the October 15 earthquake at the Philippine Trench.
So yeah, it sucked, and sorry , but I don't think you have much to worry about at this point, other than a few more aftershocks. They will diminish in magnitude and frequency with time.
The Great Day
Sir, Salamat Kaayo Po
With your permission can i share this everywhere here to help ease the intense fears of a great number of thousands who need hope more than anything to cope with the negative rumors and dam after shocks?
The Great Day
Thank you...pm sent.
Thank you one and all...
shock now at 7:05 as i type
phill time if you want to check
StealthyKat
The Great Day
Thank you...pm sent.
Thank you one and all...
shock now at 7:05 as i type
phill time if you want to check
I knew TA could help...... Good luck to you